From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751413Ab1AEREN (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Jan 2011 12:04:13 -0500 Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:35802 "EHLO casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751170Ab1AEREM convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Jan 2011 12:04:12 -0500 Subject: Re: [RFC -v3 PATCH 2/3] sched: add yield_to function From: Peter Zijlstra To: Mike Galbraith Cc: Rik van Riel , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Avi Kiviti , Srivatsa Vaddagiri , Chris Wright In-Reply-To: <1294246647.8369.52.camel@marge.simson.net> References: <20110103162637.29f23c40@annuminas.surriel.com> <20110103162918.577a9620@annuminas.surriel.com> <1294164289.2016.186.camel@laptop> <1294246647.8369.52.camel@marge.simson.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2011 18:04:25 +0100 Message-ID: <1294247065.2016.267.camel@laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 17:57 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote: > + p_cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(pse); > + local = 1; > + } > +#endif > + > + /* Tell the scheduler that we'd really like pse to run next. */ > + p_cfs_rq->next = pse; > + > + /* We know whether we want to preempt or not, but are we allowed? */ > + preempt &= same_thread_group(p, task_of(p_cfs_rq->curr)); > + > + if (local) > + clear_buddies(cfs_rq, se); You might want to clear before setting next :-)