From: Richard Mortimer <richm@oldelvet.org.uk>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: richm@oldelvet.org.uk, 609371@bugs.debian.org,
ben@decadent.org.uk, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
fweisbec@gmail.com, mingo@redhat.com, Jesper.Nilsson@axis.com,
jeffm@suse.com
Subject: Re: R_SPARC_13
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 23:34:03 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1295307243.32152.106.camel@duncow> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110117.130238.245404805.davem@davemloft.net>
On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 13:02 -0800, David Miller wrote:
> From: Richard Mortimer <richm@oldelvet.org.uk>
> Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 19:46:21 +0000
>
> > As an example from drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c function scsi_eh_wakeup().
> >
> > This has relocation records of
> ...
> > 0000000000002be4 R_SPARC_LO10 __tracepoint_scsi_eh_wakeup
> > 0000000000002be4 R_SPARC_13 *ABS*+0x0000000000000008
> ...
> > lduw [%g1+%lo(__tracepoint_scsi_eh_wakeup)+8], %g2 ! __tracepoint_scsi_eh_wakeup.state,
>
> In a final object, the binutils linker should be using one
> R_SPARC_OLO10 relocation for this kind of expression on sparc64. Not
> the two relocations on the same instruction it appears to be using
> here. I think you're looking at an object output by the assembler
> and not the finally linked module.
>
> You should also be careful about which objects you are analyzing. You
> should be looking at the finally linked "foo.ko" file, not the
> individual "foo.o" objects, as the majority of the relocations go away
> when the linker puts together the final module.
>
> Is that what you're doing?
Yes in this instance I was/am. Thanks for the explanation.
However the same R_SPARC_13 also exists in scsi_mod.ko. It exists in the
original Debian 2.6.37-trunk-sparc64 version and in my current build of
the same with the 8 byte alignment for _trace_events.
00000000000074a8 R_SPARC_HI22 __tracepoint_scsi_eh_wakeup
00000000000074ac R_SPARC_LO10 __tracepoint_scsi_eh_wakeup
00000000000074ac R_SPARC_13 *ABS*+0x0000000000000008
00000000000074bc R_SPARC_LO10 __tracepoint_scsi_eh_wakeup
00000000000074bc R_SPARC_13 *ABS*+0x0000000000000020
74a8: 03 00 00 00 sethi %hi(0), %g1
74ac: c4 00 60 00 ld [ %g1 ], %g2
74b0: 80 a0 a0 00 cmp %g2, 0
74b4: 02 48 00 0c be %icc, 74e4 <scsi_eh_wakeup+0x50>
74b8: 01 00 00 00 nop
74bc: e0 58 60 00 ldx [ %g1 ], %l0
I guess that points towards the binutils linker not doing the correct
thing.
ld reports its version as
$ ld -v
GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.20.1-system.20100303
and scsi_mod.ko is linked with the following command
ld -r -m elf64_sparc -T /richmtmp/linux-2.6-2.6.37/scripts/module-common.lds --build-id -o drivers/scsi/scsi_mod.ko drivers/scsi/scsi_mod.o drivers/scsi/scsi_mod.mod.o
Regards
Richard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-17 23:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 77+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20110113.155700.102679408.davem@davemloft.net>
[not found] ` <4D302B2F.7030108@oldelvet.org.uk>
[not found] ` <4D3074FE.3030707@oldelvet.org.uk>
2011-01-16 5:17 ` Bug#609371: linux-image-2.6.37-trunk-sparc64: module scsi_mod: Unknown relocation: 36 David Miller
2011-01-16 14:17 ` Richard Mortimer
2011-01-16 19:39 ` David Miller
2011-01-17 14:11 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-01-17 14:37 ` Bastian Blank
2011-01-17 19:35 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-01-18 6:36 ` David Miller
2011-01-18 5:34 ` David Miller
2011-01-18 6:00 ` David Miller
2011-01-18 6:08 ` David Miller
2011-01-18 16:46 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-01-18 17:33 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-01-18 18:16 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-01-18 18:26 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-01-18 20:13 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-01-18 20:22 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-01-19 5:08 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-01-19 5:16 ` David Miller
2011-01-19 15:10 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-01-19 16:14 ` Sam Ravnborg
2011-01-19 16:18 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-01-19 6:32 ` David Miller
2011-01-19 7:20 ` David Miller
2011-01-19 15:33 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-01-19 21:40 ` David Miller
2011-01-19 22:00 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-01-19 22:09 ` David Miller
2011-01-19 22:21 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-01-19 22:23 ` David Miller
2011-01-19 22:32 ` Sam Ravnborg
2011-01-19 22:34 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-01-19 22:13 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-01-19 22:21 ` David Miller
2011-01-19 22:33 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-01-20 0:41 ` David Miller
2011-01-21 0:04 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-01-21 18:06 ` Richard Mortimer
2011-01-21 18:52 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-01-21 19:15 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-01-21 20:14 ` Richard Mortimer
2011-01-21 20:40 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-01-21 22:50 ` Richard Mortimer
2011-01-22 18:42 ` Richard Mortimer
2011-01-22 18:53 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-01-19 15:46 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-01-19 16:15 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-01-19 18:13 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-01-19 18:20 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-01-19 21:44 ` David Miller
2011-01-19 22:15 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-01-19 22:22 ` David Miller
2011-01-19 15:11 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-01-19 15:27 ` Richard Mortimer
2011-01-17 6:07 ` David Miller
2011-01-17 9:05 ` Jesper Nilsson
2011-02-01 5:11 ` David Miller
2011-02-01 10:03 ` Jesper Nilsson
2011-01-17 10:22 ` Richard Mortimer
2011-01-17 14:15 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-01-18 6:35 ` David Miller
2011-01-18 17:30 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-01-17 19:46 ` R_SPARC_13 (Re: Bug#609371: linux-image-2.6.37-trunk-sparc64: module scsi_mod: Unknown relocation: 36) Richard Mortimer
2011-01-17 21:02 ` R_SPARC_13 David Miller
2011-01-17 23:34 ` Richard Mortimer [this message]
2011-01-18 0:18 ` R_SPARC_13 David Miller
2011-01-18 0:37 ` R_SPARC_13 David Miller
2011-01-18 1:28 ` R_SPARC_13 Richard Mortimer
2011-01-18 6:50 ` R_SPARC_13 David Miller
2011-01-18 10:52 ` R_SPARC_13 Richard Mortimer
2011-01-18 13:23 ` R_SPARC_13 Richard Mortimer
2011-01-18 21:00 ` R_SPARC_13 David Miller
2011-01-19 4:12 ` R_SPARC_13 David Miller
2011-01-17 14:39 ` Bug#609371: linux-image-2.6.37-trunk-sparc64: module scsi_mod: Unknown relocation: 36 Bernhard R. Link
2011-01-18 5:24 ` David Miller
2011-01-18 9:26 ` Jesper Nilsson
2011-01-18 6:27 ` David Miller
2011-01-18 17:05 ` Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1295307243.32152.106.camel@duncow \
--to=richm@oldelvet.org.uk \
--cc=609371@bugs.debian.org \
--cc=Jesper.Nilsson@axis.com \
--cc=ben@decadent.org.uk \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=jeffm@suse.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox