public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@gmail.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	samu.p.onkalo@nokia.com,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	tglx <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: Bug in scheduler when using rt_mutex
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 08:41:05 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1295422865.18384.9.camel@marge.simson.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110119071917.GA26086@elte.hu>

On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 08:19 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 14:09 +0800, Yong Zhang wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 1:40 PM, Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 12:35 +0800, Yong Zhang wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> cfs_rq->curr != se is always true.
> > > >
> > > > If that were always true, we'd illegally enqueue a running task.
> > > 
> > > I'm sorry that I'm not express myself correctly.
> > 
> > Human communication methods are all buggy as hell :)
> 
> Not to mention that they are slow, inefficient and ambiguous.
> 
> But wht did you expect? The original authors of the code are long gone and 
> maintenance is done by newcomers who are patching the code bit by bit. What
> you get from such a development model is pretty predictable: ~1 billion years
> old spaghetti DNA that no-one truly understands.

Gotta give the original authors credit though, their self modifying code
comes equipped with a fully automated hardware break-point debugger.

	-Mike


  reply	other threads:[~2011-01-19  7:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-01-17 14:42 Bug in scheduler when using rt_mutex Onkalo Samu
2011-01-17 15:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-17 15:15   ` samu.p.onkalo
2011-01-17 15:28     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-17 16:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-18  8:23   ` Onkalo Samu
2011-01-18  8:59     ` Yong Zhang
2011-01-18 13:35       ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-18 14:25         ` Onkalo Samu
2011-01-19  2:38         ` Yong Zhang
2011-01-19  3:43           ` Mike Galbraith
2011-01-19  4:35             ` Yong Zhang
2011-01-19  5:40               ` Mike Galbraith
2011-01-19  6:09                 ` Yong Zhang
2011-01-19  6:37                   ` Mike Galbraith
2011-01-19  7:19                     ` Ingo Molnar
2011-01-19  7:41                       ` Mike Galbraith [this message]
2011-01-19  9:44           ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-19 10:38             ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-19 11:30               ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-19 12:58                 ` Onkalo Samu
2011-01-19 13:13                   ` Onkalo Samu
2011-01-19 13:30                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-20  4:18                       ` Yong Zhang
2011-01-20  4:27                         ` Yong Zhang
2011-01-20  5:32                           ` Yong Zhang
2011-01-20  4:59                         ` Mike Galbraith
2011-01-20  5:30                           ` Yong Zhang
2011-01-20  6:12                             ` Mike Galbraith
2011-01-20  7:06                               ` Yong Zhang
2011-01-20  8:37                                 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-01-20  9:07                                   ` Yong Zhang
2011-01-20 10:07                                     ` Mike Galbraith
2011-01-21 11:08                                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-21 12:24                                         ` Yong Zhang
2011-01-21 13:40                                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-21 15:03                                             ` Yong Zhang
2011-01-21 15:10                                               ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-21 13:15                                       ` Yong Zhang
2011-01-20  7:07                       ` Onkalo Samu
2011-01-21  6:25                         ` Onkalo Samu
2011-01-20  3:10             ` Yong Zhang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1295422865.18384.9.camel@marge.simson.net \
    --to=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=samu.p.onkalo@nokia.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=yong.zhang0@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox