From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@gmail.com>
Cc: samu.p.onkalo@nokia.com, mingo@elte.hu,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
tglx <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: Bug in scheduler when using rt_mutex
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 12:30:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1295436632.30950.1542.camel@laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1295433498.30950.1482.camel@laptop>
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 11:38 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Hrm, I think the to bit is not needed with the from thing in place, the
> enqueue from _setprio will already have added min_vruntime
Would lead to something like this:
---
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
@@ -8108,6 +8108,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__might_sleep);
#ifdef CONFIG_MAGIC_SYSRQ
static void normalize_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
{
+ struct sched_class *prev_class = p->sched_class;
+ int old_prio = p->prio;
int on_rq;
on_rq = p->se.on_rq;
@@ -8118,6 +8120,8 @@ static void normalize_task(struct rq *rq
activate_task(rq, p, 0);
resched_task(rq->curr);
}
+
+ check_class_changed(rq, p, prev_class, old_prio, task_current(rq, p));
}
void normalize_rt_tasks(void)
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched_fair.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched_fair.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched_fair.c
@@ -4066,11 +4066,30 @@ static void prio_changed_fair(struct rq
check_preempt_curr(rq, p, 0);
}
+static void
+switched_from_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int running)
+{
+ struct sched_entity *se = &p->se;
+ struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
+
+ /*
+ * Ensure the task's vruntime is normalized, so that when its
+ * switched back to the fair class the enqueue_entity(.flags=0) will
+ * do the right thing.
+ *
+ * If it was on_rq, then the dequeue_entity(.flags=0) will already
+ * have normalized the vruntime, if it was !on_rq, then only when
+ * the task is sleeping will it still have non-normalized vruntime.
+ */
+ if (!se->on_rq && p->state != TASK_RUNNING)
+ se->vruntime -= cfs_rq->min_vruntime;
+}
+
/*
* We switched to the sched_fair class.
*/
-static void switched_to_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p,
- int running)
+static void
+switched_to_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int running)
{
/*
* We were most likely switched from sched_rt, so
@@ -4163,6 +4182,7 @@ static const struct sched_class fair_sch
.task_fork = task_fork_fair,
.prio_changed = prio_changed_fair,
+ .switched_from = switched_from_fair,
.switched_to = switched_to_fair,
.get_rr_interval = get_rr_interval_fair,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-19 11:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-17 14:42 Bug in scheduler when using rt_mutex Onkalo Samu
2011-01-17 15:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-17 15:15 ` samu.p.onkalo
2011-01-17 15:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-17 16:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-18 8:23 ` Onkalo Samu
2011-01-18 8:59 ` Yong Zhang
2011-01-18 13:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-18 14:25 ` Onkalo Samu
2011-01-19 2:38 ` Yong Zhang
2011-01-19 3:43 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-01-19 4:35 ` Yong Zhang
2011-01-19 5:40 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-01-19 6:09 ` Yong Zhang
2011-01-19 6:37 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-01-19 7:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-01-19 7:41 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-01-19 9:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-19 10:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-19 11:30 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2011-01-19 12:58 ` Onkalo Samu
2011-01-19 13:13 ` Onkalo Samu
2011-01-19 13:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-20 4:18 ` Yong Zhang
2011-01-20 4:27 ` Yong Zhang
2011-01-20 5:32 ` Yong Zhang
2011-01-20 4:59 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-01-20 5:30 ` Yong Zhang
2011-01-20 6:12 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-01-20 7:06 ` Yong Zhang
2011-01-20 8:37 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-01-20 9:07 ` Yong Zhang
2011-01-20 10:07 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-01-21 11:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-21 12:24 ` Yong Zhang
2011-01-21 13:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-21 15:03 ` Yong Zhang
2011-01-21 15:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-21 13:15 ` Yong Zhang
2011-01-20 7:07 ` Onkalo Samu
2011-01-21 6:25 ` Onkalo Samu
2011-01-20 3:10 ` Yong Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1295436632.30950.1542.camel@laptop \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=samu.p.onkalo@nokia.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=yong.zhang0@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox