From: Onkalo Samu <samu.p.onkalo@nokia.com>
To: ext Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@gmail.com>,
mingo@elte.hu,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
tglx <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: Bug in scheduler when using rt_mutex
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 15:13:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1295442799.11678.43.camel@kolo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1295441881.11678.41.camel@kolo>
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 14:58 +0200, Onkalo Samu wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 12:30 +0100, ext Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 11:38 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >
> > > Hrm, I think the to bit is not needed with the from thing in place, the
> > > enqueue from _setprio will already have added min_vruntime
> >
> >
> > Would lead to something like this:
> >
>
> Doesn't work in my case.
When the task is sleeping rt_mutex_setprio
doesn't call check_class_changed since the task is not
in queue at that moment I think.
>
> > ---
> > Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched.c
> > +++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
> > @@ -8108,6 +8108,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__might_sleep);
> > #ifdef CONFIG_MAGIC_SYSRQ
> > static void normalize_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
> > {
> > + struct sched_class *prev_class = p->sched_class;
> > + int old_prio = p->prio;
> > int on_rq;
> >
> > on_rq = p->se.on_rq;
> > @@ -8118,6 +8120,8 @@ static void normalize_task(struct rq *rq
> > activate_task(rq, p, 0);
> > resched_task(rq->curr);
> > }
> > +
> > + check_class_changed(rq, p, prev_class, old_prio, task_current(rq, p));
> > }
> >
> > void normalize_rt_tasks(void)
> > Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched_fair.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched_fair.c
> > +++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched_fair.c
> > @@ -4066,11 +4066,30 @@ static void prio_changed_fair(struct rq
> > check_preempt_curr(rq, p, 0);
> > }
> >
> > +static void
> > +switched_from_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int running)
> > +{
> > + struct sched_entity *se = &p->se;
> > + struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Ensure the task's vruntime is normalized, so that when its
> > + * switched back to the fair class the enqueue_entity(.flags=0) will
> > + * do the right thing.
> > + *
> > + * If it was on_rq, then the dequeue_entity(.flags=0) will already
> > + * have normalized the vruntime, if it was !on_rq, then only when
> > + * the task is sleeping will it still have non-normalized vruntime.
> > + */
> > + if (!se->on_rq && p->state != TASK_RUNNING)
> > + se->vruntime -= cfs_rq->min_vruntime;
> > +}
> > +
> > /*
> > * We switched to the sched_fair class.
> > */
> > -static void switched_to_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p,
> > - int running)
> > +static void
> > +switched_to_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int running)
> > {
> > /*
> > * We were most likely switched from sched_rt, so
> > @@ -4163,6 +4182,7 @@ static const struct sched_class fair_sch
> > .task_fork = task_fork_fair,
> >
> > .prio_changed = prio_changed_fair,
> > + .switched_from = switched_from_fair,
> > .switched_to = switched_to_fair,
> >
> > .get_rr_interval = get_rr_interval_fair,
> >
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-19 13:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-17 14:42 Bug in scheduler when using rt_mutex Onkalo Samu
2011-01-17 15:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-17 15:15 ` samu.p.onkalo
2011-01-17 15:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-17 16:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-18 8:23 ` Onkalo Samu
2011-01-18 8:59 ` Yong Zhang
2011-01-18 13:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-18 14:25 ` Onkalo Samu
2011-01-19 2:38 ` Yong Zhang
2011-01-19 3:43 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-01-19 4:35 ` Yong Zhang
2011-01-19 5:40 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-01-19 6:09 ` Yong Zhang
2011-01-19 6:37 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-01-19 7:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-01-19 7:41 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-01-19 9:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-19 10:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-19 11:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-19 12:58 ` Onkalo Samu
2011-01-19 13:13 ` Onkalo Samu [this message]
2011-01-19 13:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-20 4:18 ` Yong Zhang
2011-01-20 4:27 ` Yong Zhang
2011-01-20 5:32 ` Yong Zhang
2011-01-20 4:59 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-01-20 5:30 ` Yong Zhang
2011-01-20 6:12 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-01-20 7:06 ` Yong Zhang
2011-01-20 8:37 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-01-20 9:07 ` Yong Zhang
2011-01-20 10:07 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-01-21 11:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-21 12:24 ` Yong Zhang
2011-01-21 13:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-21 15:03 ` Yong Zhang
2011-01-21 15:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-21 13:15 ` Yong Zhang
2011-01-20 7:07 ` Onkalo Samu
2011-01-21 6:25 ` Onkalo Samu
2011-01-20 3:10 ` Yong Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1295442799.11678.43.camel@kolo \
--to=samu.p.onkalo@nokia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=yong.zhang0@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox