From: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
To: "Ted Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: "Shi, Alex" <alex.shi@intel.com>,
"czoccolo@gmail.com" <czoccolo@gmail.com>,
"vgoyal@redhat.com" <vgoyal@redhat.com>,
"jaxboe@fusionio.com" <jaxboe@fusionio.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Chen, Tim C" <tim.c.chen@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [performance bug] kernel building regression on 64 LCPUs machine
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 10:12:04 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1295489524.1949.884.camel@sli10-conroe> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110119143214.GA3043@thunk.org>
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 22:32 +0800, Ted Ts'o wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 09:55:48AM +0800, Alex,Shi wrote:
> > Shaohua and I tested kernel building performance on latest kernel. and
> > found it is drop about 15% on our 64 LCPUs NHM-EX machine on ext4 file
> > system.
>
> What kerenl version were you comparing against? And what were you
> using to benchmark this performance drop? I'm curious what your
> workload was; I'm guesisng it was some kind of mixed read/write
> workload? Were there any fsync()'s involved?
2.6.36 vs 2.6.37. this exists in 2.6.37-rc1. it's a kbuild, no a mixed
read/write workload. kbuild hasn't fsync involved
Thanks,
Shaohua
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-20 2:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-19 1:55 [performance bug] kernel building regression on 64 LCPUs machine Alex,Shi
2011-01-19 2:03 ` Shaohua Li
2011-01-19 12:56 ` Jan Kara
2011-01-20 7:52 ` Alex,Shi
2011-01-20 15:16 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-01-21 7:17 ` Shaohua Li
2011-01-26 8:15 ` Shaohua Li
2011-02-12 9:21 ` Alex,Shi
2011-02-12 18:25 ` Corrado Zoccolo
2011-02-14 2:25 ` Alex,Shi
2011-02-15 1:10 ` Shaohua Li
2011-02-21 16:49 ` Jan Kara
2011-02-23 8:24 ` Alex,Shi
2011-02-24 12:13 ` Jan Kara
2011-02-25 0:44 ` Alex Shi
2011-02-26 14:45 ` Corrado Zoccolo
2011-03-01 19:56 ` Jeff Moyer
2011-03-02 9:42 ` Jan Kara
2011-03-02 16:13 ` Jeff Moyer
2011-03-02 21:17 ` Jan Kara
2011-03-02 21:20 ` Jeff Moyer
2011-03-03 1:14 ` Jeff Moyer
2011-03-04 15:32 ` Jan Kara
2011-03-04 15:40 ` Jeff Moyer
2011-03-04 15:50 ` Jeff Moyer
2011-03-04 18:27 ` Jeff Moyer
2011-03-22 7:38 ` Alex,Shi
2011-03-22 16:14 ` Jan Kara
2011-03-22 17:46 ` Jeff Moyer
2011-03-24 6:45 ` Alex,Shi
2011-03-28 19:48 ` Jan Kara
2011-01-19 14:32 ` Ted Ts'o
2011-01-20 2:12 ` Shaohua Li [this message]
2011-01-21 7:23 ` Corrado Zoccolo
2011-01-21 7:47 ` Alex,Shi
2011-01-21 7:52 ` Alex,Shi
2011-01-21 8:13 ` Corrado Zoccolo
2011-01-21 8:20 ` Shaohua Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1295489524.1949.884.camel@sli10-conroe \
--to=shaohua.li@intel.com \
--cc=alex.shi@intel.com \
--cc=czoccolo@gmail.com \
--cc=jaxboe@fusionio.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tim.c.chen@intel.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox