From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753815Ab1AUHjJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Jan 2011 02:39:09 -0500 Received: from gate.crashing.org ([63.228.1.57]:51911 "EHLO gate.crashing.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750882Ab1AUHjH (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Jan 2011 02:39:07 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/21] mm: Preemptibility -v6 From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Hugh Dickins Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Andrew Morton , David Miller , Nick Piggin , Martin Schwidefsky , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrea Arcangeli In-Reply-To: References: <20101126143843.801484792@chello.nl> <1295457039.28776.137.camel@laptop> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 18:36:32 +1100 Message-ID: <1295595392.2148.285.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 11:57 -0800, Hugh Dickins wrote: > > But that doesn't preclude lumping them all together for the final > commit, > for ease of bisection. I think Andrew and Ben are the ones to decide > on that: Ben's bisectability got burnt by THP just now, so he'll have > strong feelings and good reasons. I do hate bisectability breakage indeed ... :-) Cheers, Ben.