From: Sander Eikelenboom <linux@eikelenboom.it>
To: Sander Eikelenboom <linux@eikelenboom.it>,
Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>,
"Gustavo F. Padovan" <gustavo@padovan.org>,
Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "bluez mailin list (linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org)"
<linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [RC6 Bell Chime] Re: [PATCH 00/24] rfcomm fixes
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 09:38:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1295963563.20140310093843@eikelenboom.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1335661753.20140303203853@eikelenboom.it>
Hi all,
Since:
- 3.14-RC6 has been cut
- this regression is known and reported since the merge window
- the fix (revert of 3 patches) is known for over a month now
- but it's still not in mainline
- my polite ping request from last week seems to have provoked exactly 0 (zero) response.
IT'S TIME TO CHIME SOME BELLS :-)
Hope that WILL be heard somewhere ...
--
Sander
PS. on the informative side the 3 commits to be reverted are:
f86772af6a0f643d3e13eb3f4f9213ae0c333ee4 Bluetooth: Remove rfcomm_carrier_raised()
4a2fb3ecc7467c775b154813861f25a0ddc11aa0 Bluetooth: Always wait for a connection on RFCOMM open()
e228b63390536f5b737056059a9a04ea016b1abf Bluetooth: Move rfcomm_get_device() before rfcomm_dev_activate()
Monday, March 3, 2014, 8:38:53 PM, you wrote:
> Wednesday, February 12, 2014, 12:06:44 PM, you wrote:
>> Monday, February 10, 2014, 11:09:38 PM, you wrote:
>>> Hi Peter,
>>>> This patch series addresses a number of previously unknown issues
>>>> with the RFCOMM tty device implementation, in addition to
>>>> addressing the locking regression recently reported [1].
>>>>
>>>> As Gianluca suggested and I agree, this series first reverts
>>>> 3 of the 4 patches of 3.14-rc1 for bluetooth/rfcomm/tty.c.
>>> so for 3.14 we should revert 3 patches. And then the other 21 are intended for 3.15 merge window.
>>> I realize that we still have to deal with some breakage, but we do not want regressions and I clearly not going to take 24 patches for 3.14 at this point in time.
>>> What I can do is take all 24 patches into bluetooth-next and let them sit for 1 week and have people test them. And then we go ahead with reverting 3 patches from 3.14. Does that make sense?
>> Reverting those 3 patches works for me.
>> --
>> Sander
>>> Regards
>>> Marcel
> Hi Marcel,
> Ping... it seems these 3 reverts are still not in 3.14-rc5 to fix the regressions ?
> --
> Sander
--
Best regards,
Sander mailto:linux@eikelenboom.it
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-10 8:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-10 1:59 [PATCH 00/24] rfcomm fixes Peter Hurley
2014-02-10 1:59 ` [PATCH 01/24] Revert "Bluetooth: Remove rfcomm_carrier_raised()" Peter Hurley
2014-02-10 1:59 ` [PATCH 02/24] Revert "Bluetooth: Always wait for a connection on RFCOMM open()" Peter Hurley
2014-02-10 1:59 ` [PATCH 03/24] Revert "Bluetooth: Move rfcomm_get_device() before rfcomm_dev_activate()" Peter Hurley
2014-02-10 1:59 ` [PATCH 04/24] tty: Fix ref counting for port krefs Peter Hurley
2014-02-13 18:36 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2014-02-10 1:59 ` [PATCH 05/24] Bluetooth: Fix racy acquire of rfcomm_dev reference Peter Hurley
2014-02-10 1:59 ` [PATCH 06/24] Bluetooth: Exclude released devices from RFCOMMGETDEVLIST ioctl Peter Hurley
2014-02-10 1:59 ` [PATCH 07/24] Bluetooth: Release rfcomm_dev only once Peter Hurley
2014-02-10 1:59 ` [PATCH 08/24] Bluetooth: Fix unreleased rfcomm_dev reference Peter Hurley
2014-02-10 1:59 ` [PATCH 09/24] Bluetooth: Fix RFCOMM tty teardown race Peter Hurley
2014-02-10 1:59 ` [PATCH 10/24] Bluetooth: Verify dlci not in use before rfcomm_dev create Peter Hurley
2014-02-10 1:59 ` [PATCH 11/24] Bluetooth: Simplify RFCOMM session state eval Peter Hurley
2014-02-10 1:59 ` [PATCH 12/24] Bluetooth: Refactor deferred setup test in rfcomm_dlc_close() Peter Hurley
2014-02-10 1:59 ` [PATCH 13/24] Bluetooth: Refactor dlc disconnect logic " Peter Hurley
2014-02-10 1:59 ` [PATCH 14/24] Bluetooth: Directly close dlc for not yet started RFCOMM session Peter Hurley
2014-02-10 1:59 ` [PATCH 15/24] Bluetooth: Fix unsafe RFCOMM device parenting Peter Hurley
2014-02-10 1:59 ` [PATCH 16/24] Bluetooth: Fix RFCOMM parent device for reused dlc Peter Hurley
2014-02-10 1:59 ` [PATCH 17/24] Bluetooth: Rename __rfcomm_dev_get() to __rfcomm_dev_lookup() Peter Hurley
2014-02-10 1:59 ` [PATCH 18/24] Bluetooth: Serialize RFCOMMCREATEDEV and RFCOMMRELEASEDEV ioctls Peter Hurley
2014-02-10 1:59 ` [PATCH 19/24] Bluetooth: Refactor rfcomm_dev_add() Peter Hurley
2014-02-10 1:59 ` [PATCH 20/24] Bluetooth: Cleanup RFCOMM device registration error handling Peter Hurley
2014-02-10 1:59 ` [PATCH 21/24] Bluetooth: Force -EIO from tty read/write if .activate() fails Peter Hurley
2014-02-10 1:59 ` [PATCH 22/24] Bluetooth: Don't fail RFCOMM tty writes Peter Hurley
2014-02-10 1:59 ` [PATCH 23/24] Bluetooth: Refactor write_room() calculation Peter Hurley
2014-02-10 1:59 ` [PATCH 24/24] Bluetooth: Fix " Peter Hurley
2014-02-10 22:09 ` [PATCH 00/24] rfcomm fixes Marcel Holtmann
2014-02-10 23:00 ` Peter Hurley
2014-02-12 22:58 ` Marcel Holtmann
2014-02-13 0:38 ` Peter Hurley
2014-02-13 21:48 ` Alexander Holler
2014-02-12 11:06 ` Sander Eikelenboom
2014-03-03 19:38 ` Sander Eikelenboom
2014-03-10 8:38 ` Sander Eikelenboom [this message]
2014-03-10 15:08 ` [RC6 Bell Chime] " John W. Linville
2014-03-11 15:14 ` [RC6 Bell Chime] " Marcel Holtmann
2014-03-14 0:49 ` Sander Eikelenboom
2014-03-14 1:28 ` Marcel Holtmann
2014-03-14 1:29 ` Peter Hurley
2014-03-15 13:51 ` Sander Eikelenboom
2014-03-15 17:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-03-15 20:45 ` Peter Hurley
2014-03-15 22:20 ` Sander Eikelenboom
2014-03-16 0:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-02-13 21:41 ` Alexander Holler
2014-02-14 21:45 ` Marcel Holtmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1295963563.20140310093843@eikelenboom.it \
--to=linux@eikelenboom.it \
--cc=gustavo@padovan.org \
--cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcel@holtmann.org \
--cc=peter@hurleysoftware.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox