From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Glauber Costa <glommer@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
aliguori@us.ibm.com, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com>,
Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/16] KVM-GST: adjust scheduler cpu power
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 17:46:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1296060386.28776.1312.camel@laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1296056617.3591.26.camel@mothafucka.localdomain>
On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 13:43 -0200, Glauber Costa wrote:
> yes, but once this delta is subtracted from rq->clock_task, this value is not
> used to dictate power, unless I am mistaken.
>
> power is adjusted according to scale_rt_power(), which does it using the
> values of rq->rt_avg, rq->age_stamp, and rq->clock.
>
> So whatever I store into rq->clock_task, but not rq->clock (which
> correct me if I'm wrong, is expected to be walltime), will not be used
> to adjust cpu power, which is what I'm trying to achieve.
No, see the below, it uses a per-cpu virt_steal_time() clock which is
expected to return steal-time in ns.
All time not accounted to ->clock_task is accumulated in lost, and
passed into sched_rt_avg_update() and thus affects the cpu_power.
If it finds that 50% of the (recent) time is steal time, its cpu_power
will be 50%.
---
kernel/sched.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
kernel/sched_features.h | 2 +-
2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
index 18d38e4..c71384c 100644
--- a/kernel/sched.c
+++ b/kernel/sched.c
@@ -523,6 +523,9 @@ struct rq {
#ifdef CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING
u64 prev_irq_time;
#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_PARAVIRT
+ u64 prev_steal_time;
+#endif
/* calc_load related fields */
unsigned long calc_load_update;
@@ -1888,11 +1891,15 @@ void account_system_vtime(struct task_struct *curr)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(account_system_vtime);
+#endif /* CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING */
+
static void update_rq_clock_task(struct rq *rq, s64 delta)
{
- s64 irq_delta;
+ s64 lost_delta __maybe_unused;
+ s64 lost = 0;
- irq_delta = irq_time_read(cpu_of(rq)) - rq->prev_irq_time;
+#ifdef CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING
+ lost_delta = irq_time_read(cpu_of(rq)) - rq->prev_irq_time;
/*
* Since irq_time is only updated on {soft,}irq_exit, we might run into
@@ -1909,26 +1916,31 @@ static void update_rq_clock_task(struct rq *rq, s64 delta)
* the current rq->clock timestamp, except that would require using
* atomic ops.
*/
- if (irq_delta > delta)
- irq_delta = delta;
+ if (lost_delta > delta)
+ lost_delta = delta;
- rq->prev_irq_time += irq_delta;
- delta -= irq_delta;
- rq->clock_task += delta;
+ rq->prev_irq_time += lost_delta;
+ lost += lost_delta;
+#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_PARAVIRT
+ lost_delta = virt_steal_time(cpu_of(rq)) - rq->prev_steal_time;
+
+ /*
+ * unlikely, unless steal_time accounting is iffy
+ */
+ if (lost + lost_delta > delta)
+ lost_delta = delta - lost;
- if (irq_delta && sched_feat(NONIRQ_POWER))
- sched_rt_avg_update(rq, irq_delta);
-}
+ rq->prev_steal_time += lost_delta;
+ lost += lost_delta
+#endif
-#else /* CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING */
+ rq->clock_task += delta - lost;
-static void update_rq_clock_task(struct rq *rq, s64 delta)
-{
- rq->clock_task += delta;
+ if (lost && sched_feat(NONTASK_POWER))
+ sched_rt_avg_update(rq, lost);
}
-#endif /* CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING */
-
#include "sched_idletask.c"
#include "sched_fair.c"
#include "sched_rt.c"
diff --git a/kernel/sched_features.h b/kernel/sched_features.h
index 68e69ac..b334a2d 100644
--- a/kernel/sched_features.h
+++ b/kernel/sched_features.h
@@ -63,4 +63,4 @@ SCHED_FEAT(OWNER_SPIN, 1)
/*
* Decrement CPU power based on irq activity
*/
-SCHED_FEAT(NONIRQ_POWER, 1)
+SCHED_FEAT(NONTASK_POWER, 1)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-26 16:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-24 18:06 [PATCH 00/16] New Proposal for steal time in KVM Glauber Costa
2011-01-24 18:06 ` [PATCH 01/16] KVM-HDR: register KVM basic header infrastructure Glauber Costa
2011-01-26 11:06 ` Avi Kivity
2011-01-26 12:13 ` Glauber Costa
2011-01-26 15:12 ` Avi Kivity
2011-01-26 15:36 ` Glauber Costa
2011-01-26 17:22 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-01-26 17:49 ` Glauber Costa
2011-01-27 12:31 ` Avi Kivity
2011-01-24 18:06 ` [PATCH 02/16] KVM-HV: KVM - KVM Virtual Memory hypervisor implementation Glauber Costa
2011-01-24 18:06 ` [PATCH 03/16] KVM-HDR: KVM Userspace registering ioctl Glauber Costa
2011-01-26 11:12 ` Avi Kivity
2011-01-26 12:14 ` Glauber Costa
2011-01-26 15:14 ` Avi Kivity
2011-01-26 15:23 ` Glauber Costa
2011-01-24 18:06 ` [PATCH 04/16] KVM-HV: " Glauber Costa
2011-01-24 18:06 ` [PATCH 05/16] KVM-HDR: Implement wallclock over KVM - KVM Virtual Memory Glauber Costa
2011-01-26 11:13 ` Avi Kivity
2011-01-26 12:20 ` Glauber Costa
2011-01-26 15:17 ` Avi Kivity
2011-01-26 15:45 ` Glauber Costa
2011-01-27 12:17 ` Avi Kivity
2011-01-24 18:06 ` [PATCH 06/16] " Glauber Costa
2011-01-24 18:06 ` [PATCH 07/16] KVM-GST: " Glauber Costa
2011-01-24 18:06 ` [PATCH 08/16] KVM-HDR: Implement kvmclock systemtime " Glauber Costa
2011-01-24 18:06 ` [PATCH 09/16] KVM-HV: " Glauber Costa
2011-01-24 18:06 ` [PATCH 10/16] KVM-GST: " Glauber Costa
2011-01-24 18:06 ` [PATCH 11/16] KVM-HDR: KVM Steal time implementation Glauber Costa
2011-01-24 23:06 ` Rik van Riel
2011-01-24 18:06 ` [PATCH 12/16] KVM-HV: " Glauber Costa
2011-01-24 23:15 ` Rik van Riel
2011-01-24 18:06 ` [PATCH 13/16] KVM-HV: KVM Steal time calculation Glauber Costa
2011-01-24 23:20 ` Rik van Riel
2011-01-24 18:06 ` [PATCH 14/16] KVM-GST: KVM Steal time registration Glauber Costa
2011-01-24 23:27 ` Rik van Riel
2011-01-24 23:31 ` Rik van Riel
2011-01-25 1:25 ` Glauber Costa
2011-01-25 1:26 ` Rik van Riel
2011-01-25 1:28 ` Glauber Costa
2011-01-24 18:06 ` [PATCH 15/16] KVM-GST: KVM Steal time accounting Glauber Costa
2011-01-24 23:33 ` Rik van Riel
2011-01-24 18:06 ` [PATCH 16/16] KVM-GST: adjust scheduler cpu power Glauber Costa
2011-01-24 18:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-24 18:51 ` Glauber Costa
2011-01-24 19:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-24 19:57 ` Glauber Costa
2011-01-25 20:02 ` Glauber Costa
2011-01-25 20:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-25 20:47 ` Glauber Costa
2011-01-25 21:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-25 21:27 ` Glauber Costa
2011-01-26 9:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-26 15:43 ` Glauber Costa
2011-01-26 16:46 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2011-01-26 16:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-26 18:11 ` Glauber Costa
2011-01-24 19:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1296060386.28776.1312.camel@laptop \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=glommer@redhat.com \
--cc=jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox