From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753469Ab1BCVdi (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Feb 2011 16:33:38 -0500 Received: from e2.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.142]:52054 "EHLO e2.ny.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753173Ab1BCVdh (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Feb 2011 16:33:37 -0500 Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/6] pagewalk: only split huge pages when necessary From: Dave Hansen To: David Rientjes Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Michael J Wolf , Andrea Arcangeli In-Reply-To: References: <20110201003357.D6F0BE0D@kernel> <20110201003359.8DDFF665@kernel> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ANSI_X3.4-1968" Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 13:33:32 -0800 Message-ID: <1296768812.8299.1644.camel@nimitz> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2011-02-03 at 13:22 -0800, David Rientjes wrote: > > diff -puN mm/pagewalk.c~pagewalk-dont-always-split-thp mm/pagewalk.c > > --- linux-2.6.git/mm/pagewalk.c~pagewalk-dont-always-split-thp 2011-01-27 10:57:02.309914973 -0800 > > +++ linux-2.6.git-dave/mm/pagewalk.c 2011-01-27 10:57:02.317914965 -0800 > > @@ -33,19 +33,35 @@ static int walk_pmd_range(pud_t *pud, un > > > > pmd = pmd_offset(pud, addr); > > do { > > + again: > > checkpatch will warn about the indent. > > > next = pmd_addr_end(addr, end); > > - split_huge_page_pmd(walk->mm, pmd); > > - if (pmd_none_or_clear_bad(pmd)) { > > + if (pmd_none(*pmd)) { > > Not sure why this has been changed from pmd_none_or_clear_bad(), that's > been done even prior to THP. The bad check will trigger on huge pmds. We can not use it here. We can, however, use pmd_none(). The bad check was moved below to where we actually dereference the pmd. > > if (walk->pte_hole) > > err = walk->pte_hole(addr, next, walk); > > if (err) > > break; > > continue; > > } > > + /* > > + * This implies that each ->pmd_entry() handler > > + * needs to know about pmd_trans_huge() pmds > > + */ > > Probably needs to be documented somewhere for users of pagewalk? Probably, but we don't currently have any central documentation for it. Guess we could make some, or just ensure that all the users got updated. Any ideas where to put it other than the mm_walk struct? -- Dave