From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Cc: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>
Subject: Re: perf on 2.6.38-rc4 wedges my box
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 18:53:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1297446806.5226.44.camel@laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D55654F.6090408@gmail.com>
On Fri, 2011-02-11 at 09:35 -0700, David Ahern wrote:
> I'm guessing in your case perf is using hardware cycles for profiling.
>
> I was able to reproduce the lockup in a VM which uses cpu-clock for
> profiling - like Jeff's case. The VM is running Fedora 14 with
> 2.6.38-rc4.
>
Ah, indeed, when I use:
perf record -gfe task-clock -- ./aio-stress -O -o 0 -r 4 -d 32 -b 16 /dev/sdb
things did come apart, something like the below cured that problem (but
did show the pending softirq thing and triggered something iffy in the
backtrace code -- will have to stare at those still)
---
diff --git a/kernel/perf_event.c b/kernel/perf_event.c
index a353a4d..36fb410 100644
--- a/kernel/perf_event.c
+++ b/kernel/perf_event.c
@@ -5123,6 +5123,10 @@ static enum hrtimer_restart perf_swevent_hrtimer(struct hrtimer *hrtimer)
u64 period;
event = container_of(hrtimer, struct perf_event, hw.hrtimer);
+
+ if (event->state < PERF_EVENT_STATE_ACTIVE)
+ return HRTIMER_NORESTART;
+
event->pmu->read(event);
perf_sample_data_init(&data, 0);
@@ -5174,7 +5178,7 @@ static void perf_swevent_cancel_hrtimer(struct perf_event *event)
ktime_t remaining = hrtimer_get_remaining(&hwc->hrtimer);
local64_set(&hwc->period_left, ktime_to_ns(remaining));
- hrtimer_cancel(&hwc->hrtimer);
+ hrtimer_try_to_cancel(&hwc->hrtimer);
}
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-11 17:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-09 17:38 perf on 2.6.38-rc4 wedges my box Jeff Moyer
2011-02-09 17:47 ` David Ahern
2011-02-09 18:22 ` Jeff Moyer
2011-02-09 20:12 ` David Ahern
2011-02-09 22:11 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2011-02-10 21:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-02-11 16:35 ` David Ahern
2011-02-11 17:53 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2011-02-11 18:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-02-11 18:47 ` David Ahern
2011-02-16 13:50 ` [tip:perf/core] perf: Optimize hrtimer events tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1297446806.5226.44.camel@laptop \
--to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
--cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox