public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Cc: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>
Subject: Re: perf on 2.6.38-rc4 wedges my box
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 18:53:26 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1297446806.5226.44.camel@laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D55654F.6090408@gmail.com>

On Fri, 2011-02-11 at 09:35 -0700, David Ahern wrote:
> I'm guessing in your case perf is using hardware cycles for profiling.
> 
> I was able to reproduce the lockup in a VM which uses cpu-clock for
> profiling - like Jeff's case. The VM is running Fedora 14 with
> 2.6.38-rc4.
> 
Ah, indeed, when I use:

  perf record -gfe task-clock -- ./aio-stress -O -o 0 -r 4 -d 32 -b 16 /dev/sdb

things did come apart, something like the below cured that problem (but
did show the pending softirq thing and triggered something iffy in the
backtrace code -- will have to stare at those still)


---
diff --git a/kernel/perf_event.c b/kernel/perf_event.c
index a353a4d..36fb410 100644
--- a/kernel/perf_event.c
+++ b/kernel/perf_event.c
@@ -5123,6 +5123,10 @@ static enum hrtimer_restart perf_swevent_hrtimer(struct hrtimer *hrtimer)
 	u64 period;
 
 	event = container_of(hrtimer, struct perf_event, hw.hrtimer);
+
+	if (event->state < PERF_EVENT_STATE_ACTIVE)
+		return HRTIMER_NORESTART;
+
 	event->pmu->read(event);
 
 	perf_sample_data_init(&data, 0);
@@ -5174,7 +5178,7 @@ static void perf_swevent_cancel_hrtimer(struct perf_event *event)
 		ktime_t remaining = hrtimer_get_remaining(&hwc->hrtimer);
 		local64_set(&hwc->period_left, ktime_to_ns(remaining));
 
-		hrtimer_cancel(&hwc->hrtimer);
+		hrtimer_try_to_cancel(&hwc->hrtimer);
 	}
 }
 



  reply	other threads:[~2011-02-11 17:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-02-09 17:38 perf on 2.6.38-rc4 wedges my box Jeff Moyer
2011-02-09 17:47 ` David Ahern
2011-02-09 18:22   ` Jeff Moyer
2011-02-09 20:12     ` David Ahern
2011-02-09 22:11       ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2011-02-10 21:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-02-11 16:35   ` David Ahern
2011-02-11 17:53     ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2011-02-11 18:23       ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-02-11 18:47         ` David Ahern
2011-02-16 13:50         ` [tip:perf/core] perf: Optimize hrtimer events tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1297446806.5226.44.camel@laptop \
    --to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
    --cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
    --cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox