From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, yinghai@kernel.org,
brgerst@gmail.com, gorcunov@gmail.com, shaohui.zheng@intel.com,
rientjes@google.com, mingo@elte.hu, hpa@linux.intel.com,
ankita@in.ibm.com
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 11/33] x86-64, NUMA: Use common numa_nodes[]
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 13:20:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1297858867-25981-12-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1297858867-25981-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
ACPI and amd are using separate nodes[] array. Add numa_nodes[] and
use them in all NUMA init methods. cutoff_node() cleanup is moved
from srat_64.c to numa_64.c and applied in initmem_init() regardless
of init methods.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
Cc: Shaohui Zheng <shaohui.zheng@intel.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/numa_64.h | 1 +
arch/x86/mm/amdtopology_64.c | 19 ++++++++---------
arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++
arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c | 43 ++++++++++-----------------------------
4 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/numa_64.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/numa_64.h
index de45936..d3a4514 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/numa_64.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/numa_64.h
@@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ extern void setup_node_bootmem(int nodeid, unsigned long start,
extern nodemask_t cpu_nodes_parsed __initdata;
extern nodemask_t mem_nodes_parsed __initdata;
+extern struct bootnode numa_nodes[MAX_NUMNODES] __initdata;
extern int __cpuinit numa_cpu_node(int cpu);
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/amdtopology_64.c b/arch/x86/mm/amdtopology_64.c
index b6029a6..f049fa6 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/amdtopology_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/amdtopology_64.c
@@ -26,7 +26,6 @@
#include <asm/apic.h>
#include <asm/amd_nb.h>
-static struct bootnode __initdata nodes[8];
static unsigned char __initdata nodeids[8];
static __init int find_northbridge(void)
@@ -166,8 +165,8 @@ int __init amd_numa_init(void)
pr_info("Node %d MemBase %016lx Limit %016lx\n",
nodeid, base, limit);
- nodes[nodeid].start = base;
- nodes[nodeid].end = limit;
+ numa_nodes[nodeid].start = base;
+ numa_nodes[nodeid].end = limit;
prevbase = base;
@@ -210,8 +209,8 @@ void __init amd_get_nodes(struct bootnode *physnodes)
int i;
for_each_node_mask(i, mem_nodes_parsed) {
- physnodes[i].start = nodes[i].start;
- physnodes[i].end = nodes[i].end;
+ physnodes[i].start = numa_nodes[i].start;
+ physnodes[i].end = numa_nodes[i].end;
}
}
@@ -221,7 +220,7 @@ static int __init find_node_by_addr(unsigned long addr)
int i;
for (i = 0; i < 8; i++)
- if (addr >= nodes[i].start && addr < nodes[i].end) {
+ if (addr >= numa_nodes[i].start && addr < numa_nodes[i].end) {
ret = i;
break;
}
@@ -274,7 +273,7 @@ int __init amd_scan_nodes(void)
{
int i;
- memnode_shift = compute_hash_shift(nodes, 8, NULL);
+ memnode_shift = compute_hash_shift(numa_nodes, 8, NULL);
if (memnode_shift < 0) {
pr_err("No NUMA node hash function found. Contact maintainer\n");
return -1;
@@ -284,11 +283,11 @@ int __init amd_scan_nodes(void)
/* use the coreid bits from early_identify_cpu */
for_each_node_mask(i, node_possible_map)
memblock_x86_register_active_regions(i,
- nodes[i].start >> PAGE_SHIFT,
- nodes[i].end >> PAGE_SHIFT);
+ numa_nodes[i].start >> PAGE_SHIFT,
+ numa_nodes[i].end >> PAGE_SHIFT);
init_memory_mapping_high();
for_each_node_mask(i, node_possible_map)
- setup_node_bootmem(i, nodes[i].start, nodes[i].end);
+ setup_node_bootmem(i, numa_nodes[i].start, numa_nodes[i].end);
numa_init_array();
return 0;
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c
index 4404e1d..a6b899f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c
@@ -33,6 +33,8 @@ struct memnode memnode;
static unsigned long __initdata nodemap_addr;
static unsigned long __initdata nodemap_size;
+struct bootnode numa_nodes[MAX_NUMNODES] __initdata;
+
/*
* Given a shift value, try to populate memnodemap[]
* Returns :
@@ -182,6 +184,22 @@ static void * __init early_node_mem(int nodeid, unsigned long start,
return NULL;
}
+static __init void cutoff_node(int i, unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
+{
+ struct bootnode *nd = &numa_nodes[i];
+
+ if (nd->start < start) {
+ nd->start = start;
+ if (nd->end < nd->start)
+ nd->start = nd->end;
+ }
+ if (nd->end > end) {
+ nd->end = end;
+ if (nd->start > nd->end)
+ nd->start = nd->end;
+ }
+}
+
/* Initialize bootmem allocator for a node */
void __init
setup_node_bootmem(int nodeid, unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
@@ -638,9 +656,15 @@ void __init initmem_init(void)
nodes_clear(mem_nodes_parsed);
nodes_clear(node_possible_map);
nodes_clear(node_online_map);
+ memset(numa_nodes, 0, sizeof(numa_nodes));
if (numa_init[i]() < 0)
continue;
+
+ /* clean up the node list */
+ for (j = 0; j < MAX_NUMNODES; j++)
+ cutoff_node(j, 0, max_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT);
+
#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_EMU
setup_physnodes(0, max_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT, i == 0, i == 1);
if (cmdline && !numa_emulation(0, max_pfn, i == 0, i == 1))
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c b/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c
index 33e72ec..bfa4a6a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c
@@ -28,7 +28,6 @@ int acpi_numa __initdata;
static struct acpi_table_slit *acpi_slit;
-static struct bootnode nodes[MAX_NUMNODES] __initdata;
static struct bootnode nodes_add[MAX_NUMNODES];
static int num_node_memblks __initdata;
@@ -55,29 +54,13 @@ static __init int conflicting_memblks(unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
return -1;
}
-static __init void cutoff_node(int i, unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
-{
- struct bootnode *nd = &nodes[i];
-
- if (nd->start < start) {
- nd->start = start;
- if (nd->end < nd->start)
- nd->start = nd->end;
- }
- if (nd->end > end) {
- nd->end = end;
- if (nd->start > nd->end)
- nd->start = nd->end;
- }
-}
-
static __init void bad_srat(void)
{
int i;
printk(KERN_ERR "SRAT: SRAT not used.\n");
acpi_numa = -1;
for (i = 0; i < MAX_NUMNODES; i++) {
- nodes[i].start = nodes[i].end = 0;
+ numa_nodes[i].start = numa_nodes[i].end = 0;
nodes_add[i].start = nodes_add[i].end = 0;
}
remove_all_active_ranges();
@@ -276,12 +259,12 @@ acpi_numa_memory_affinity_init(struct acpi_srat_mem_affinity *ma)
if (i == node) {
printk(KERN_WARNING
"SRAT: Warning: PXM %d (%lx-%lx) overlaps with itself (%Lx-%Lx)\n",
- pxm, start, end, nodes[i].start, nodes[i].end);
+ pxm, start, end, numa_nodes[i].start, numa_nodes[i].end);
} else if (i >= 0) {
printk(KERN_ERR
"SRAT: PXM %d (%lx-%lx) overlaps with PXM %d (%Lx-%Lx)\n",
pxm, start, end, node_to_pxm(i),
- nodes[i].start, nodes[i].end);
+ numa_nodes[i].start, numa_nodes[i].end);
bad_srat();
return;
}
@@ -290,7 +273,7 @@ acpi_numa_memory_affinity_init(struct acpi_srat_mem_affinity *ma)
start, end);
if (!(ma->flags & ACPI_SRAT_MEM_HOT_PLUGGABLE)) {
- nd = &nodes[node];
+ nd = &numa_nodes[node];
if (!node_test_and_set(node, mem_nodes_parsed)) {
nd->start = start;
nd->end = end;
@@ -347,9 +330,8 @@ void __init acpi_get_nodes(struct bootnode *physnodes, unsigned long start,
int i;
for_each_node_mask(i, mem_nodes_parsed) {
- cutoff_node(i, start, end);
- physnodes[i].start = nodes[i].start;
- physnodes[i].end = nodes[i].end;
+ physnodes[i].start = numa_nodes[i].start;
+ physnodes[i].end = numa_nodes[i].end;
}
}
#endif /* CONFIG_NUMA_EMU */
@@ -372,10 +354,6 @@ int __init acpi_scan_nodes(void)
if (acpi_numa <= 0)
return -1;
- /* First clean up the node list */
- for (i = 0; i < MAX_NUMNODES; i++)
- cutoff_node(i, 0, max_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT);
-
/*
* Join together blocks on the same node, holes between
* which don't overlap with memory on other nodes.
@@ -440,7 +418,7 @@ int __init acpi_scan_nodes(void)
/* for out of order entries in SRAT */
sort_node_map();
- if (!nodes_cover_memory(nodes)) {
+ if (!nodes_cover_memory(numa_nodes)) {
bad_srat();
return -1;
}
@@ -449,12 +427,13 @@ int __init acpi_scan_nodes(void)
/* Finally register nodes */
for_each_node_mask(i, node_possible_map)
- setup_node_bootmem(i, nodes[i].start, nodes[i].end);
+ setup_node_bootmem(i, numa_nodes[i].start, numa_nodes[i].end);
/* Try again in case setup_node_bootmem missed one due
to missing bootmem */
for_each_node_mask(i, node_possible_map)
if (!node_online(i))
- setup_node_bootmem(i, nodes[i].start, nodes[i].end);
+ setup_node_bootmem(i, numa_nodes[i].start,
+ numa_nodes[i].end);
for (i = 0; i < nr_cpu_ids; i++) {
int node = early_cpu_to_node(i);
@@ -486,7 +465,7 @@ static int __init find_node_by_addr(unsigned long addr)
* the sake of simplicity, we only use a real node's starting
* address to determine which emulated node it appears on.
*/
- if (addr >= nodes[i].start && addr < nodes[i].end) {
+ if (addr >= numa_nodes[i].start && addr < numa_nodes[i].end) {
ret = i;
break;
}
--
1.7.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-16 12:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-16 12:20 [PATCHSET x86/numa] x86-64, NUMA: bring sanity to NUMA config/emulation Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 01/33] x86-64, NUMA: Make dummy node initialization path similar to non-dummy ones Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 02/33] x86-64, NUMA: Simplify hotplug node handling in acpi_numa_memory_affinity_init() Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 03/33] x86, NUMA: Drop @start/last_pfn from initmem_init() Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 04/33] x86-64, NUMA: Unify {acpi|amd}_{numa_init|scan_nodes}() arguments and return values Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 05/33] x86-64, NUMA: Wrap acpi_numa_init() so that failure can be indicated by return value Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 06/33] x86, NUMA: Move *_numa_init() invocations into initmem_init() Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 07/33] x86-64, NUMA: Restructure initmem_init() Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 08/33] x86-64, NUMA: Use common {cpu|mem}_nodes_parsed Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 09/33] x86-64, NUMA: Remove local variable found from amd_numa_init() Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 10/33] x86-64, NUMA: Move apicid to numa mapping initialization from amd_scan_nodes() to amd_numa_init() Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 12/33] x86-64, NUMA: Kill {acpi|amd}_get_nodes() Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 13/33] x86-64, NUMA: Factor out memblk handling into numa_{add|register}_memblk() Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 16:15 ` [PATCH UPDATED " Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 14/33] x86-64, NUMA: Unify use of memblk in all init methods Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 15/33] x86-64, NUMA: Unify the rest of memblk registration Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 16/33] x86-64, NUMA: Kill {acpi|amd|dummy}_scan_nodes() Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 17/33] x86-64, NUMA: Remove %NULL @nodeids handling from compute_hash_shift() Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 18/33] x86-64, NUMA: Introduce struct numa_meminfo Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 19/33] x86-64, NUMA: Separate out numa_cleanup_meminfo() Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 20/33] x86-64, NUMA: make numa_cleanup_meminfo() prettier Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 21/33] x86-64, NUMA: consolidate and improve memblk sanity checks Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 22/33] x86-64, NUMA: Add common find_node_by_addr() Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 23/33] x86-64, NUMA: Kill numa_nodes[] Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 24/33] x86-64, NUMA: Rename cpu_nodes_parsed to numa_nodes_parsed Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 25/33] x86-64, NUMA: Kill mem_nodes_parsed Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:21 ` [PATCH 26/33] x86-64, NUMA: Implement generic node distance handling Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:21 ` [PATCH 27/33] x86-64, NUMA: Trivial changes to prepare for emulation updates Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:21 ` [PATCH 28/33] x86-64, NUMA: Build and use direct emulated nid -> phys nid mapping Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 14:14 ` [PATCH UPDATED " Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:21 ` [PATCH 29/33] x86-64, NUMA: Make emulation code build numa_meminfo and share the registration path Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:21 ` [PATCH 30/33] x86-64, NUMA: Wrap node ID during emulation Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:21 ` [PATCH 31/33] x86-64, NUMA: Emulate directly from numa_meminfo Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:21 ` [PATCH 32/33] x86-64, NUMA: Unify emulated apicid -> node mapping transformation Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:21 ` [PATCH 33/33] x86-64, NUMA: Unify emulated distance mapping Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:52 ` [PATCHSET x86/numa] x86-64, NUMA: bring sanity to NUMA config/emulation Ingo Molnar
2011-02-16 14:17 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 15:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-02-16 16:23 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 17:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-02-16 17:33 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-17 12:35 ` [boot crash] " Ingo Molnar
2011-02-17 12:48 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-17 16:10 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1297858867-25981-12-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=ankita@in.ibm.com \
--cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
--cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=shaohui.zheng@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox