From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, yinghai@kernel.org,
brgerst@gmail.com, gorcunov@gmail.com, shaohui.zheng@intel.com,
rientjes@google.com, mingo@elte.hu, hpa@linux.intel.com,
ankita@in.ibm.com
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 12/33] x86-64, NUMA: Kill {acpi|amd}_get_nodes()
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 13:20:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1297858867-25981-13-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1297858867-25981-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
With common numa_nodes[], common code in numa_64.c can access it
directly. Copy directly and kill {acpi|amd}_get_nodes().
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
Cc: Shaohui Zheng <shaohui.zheng@intel.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h | 2 --
arch/x86/include/asm/amd_nb.h | 1 -
arch/x86/mm/amdtopology_64.c | 10 ----------
arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c | 23 ++++++++++-------------
arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c | 13 -------------
5 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h
index 06fb786..446a5b9 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h
@@ -185,8 +185,6 @@ struct bootnode;
#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA
extern int acpi_numa;
-extern void acpi_get_nodes(struct bootnode *physnodes, unsigned long start,
- unsigned long end);
extern int x86_acpi_numa_init(void);
extern int acpi_scan_nodes(void);
#define NR_NODE_MEMBLKS (MAX_NUMNODES*2)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/amd_nb.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/amd_nb.h
index dc3c6e3..246cdc6 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/amd_nb.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/amd_nb.h
@@ -23,7 +23,6 @@ extern int amd_set_subcaches(int, int);
#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_EMU
extern void amd_fake_nodes(const struct bootnode *nodes, int nr_nodes);
-extern void amd_get_nodes(struct bootnode *nodes);
#endif
struct amd_northbridge {
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/amdtopology_64.c b/arch/x86/mm/amdtopology_64.c
index f049fa6..cf29527 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/amdtopology_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/amdtopology_64.c
@@ -204,16 +204,6 @@ static s16 fake_apicid_to_node[MAX_LOCAL_APIC] __initdata = {
[0 ... MAX_LOCAL_APIC-1] = NUMA_NO_NODE
};
-void __init amd_get_nodes(struct bootnode *physnodes)
-{
- int i;
-
- for_each_node_mask(i, mem_nodes_parsed) {
- physnodes[i].start = numa_nodes[i].start;
- physnodes[i].end = numa_nodes[i].end;
- }
-}
-
static int __init find_node_by_addr(unsigned long addr)
{
int ret = NUMA_NO_NODE;
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c
index a6b899f..82ee308 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c
@@ -257,21 +257,18 @@ void __init numa_emu_cmdline(char *str)
cmdline = str;
}
-static int __init setup_physnodes(unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
- int acpi, int amd)
+static int __init setup_physnodes(unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
{
int ret = 0;
int i;
memset(physnodes, 0, sizeof(physnodes));
-#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA
- if (acpi)
- acpi_get_nodes(physnodes, start, end);
-#endif
-#ifdef CONFIG_AMD_NUMA
- if (amd)
- amd_get_nodes(physnodes);
-#endif
+
+ for_each_node_mask(i, mem_nodes_parsed) {
+ physnodes[i].start = numa_nodes[i].start;
+ physnodes[i].end = numa_nodes[i].end;
+ }
+
/*
* Basic sanity checking on the physical node map: there may be errors
* if the SRAT or AMD code incorrectly reported the topology or the mem=
@@ -594,7 +591,7 @@ static int __init numa_emulation(unsigned long start_pfn,
init_memory_mapping_high();
for_each_node_mask(i, node_possible_map)
setup_node_bootmem(i, nodes[i].start, nodes[i].end);
- setup_physnodes(addr, max_addr, acpi, amd);
+ setup_physnodes(addr, max_addr);
fake_physnodes(acpi, amd, num_nodes);
numa_init_array();
return 0;
@@ -666,10 +663,10 @@ void __init initmem_init(void)
cutoff_node(j, 0, max_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT);
#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_EMU
- setup_physnodes(0, max_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT, i == 0, i == 1);
+ setup_physnodes(0, max_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT);
if (cmdline && !numa_emulation(0, max_pfn, i == 0, i == 1))
return;
- setup_physnodes(0, max_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT, i == 0, i == 1);
+ setup_physnodes(0, max_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT);
nodes_clear(node_possible_map);
nodes_clear(node_online_map);
#endif
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c b/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c
index bfa4a6a..82b1087 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c
@@ -323,19 +323,6 @@ static int __init nodes_cover_memory(const struct bootnode *nodes)
void __init acpi_numa_arch_fixup(void) {}
-#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_EMU
-void __init acpi_get_nodes(struct bootnode *physnodes, unsigned long start,
- unsigned long end)
-{
- int i;
-
- for_each_node_mask(i, mem_nodes_parsed) {
- physnodes[i].start = numa_nodes[i].start;
- physnodes[i].end = numa_nodes[i].end;
- }
-}
-#endif /* CONFIG_NUMA_EMU */
-
int __init x86_acpi_numa_init(void)
{
int ret;
--
1.7.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-16 12:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-16 12:20 [PATCHSET x86/numa] x86-64, NUMA: bring sanity to NUMA config/emulation Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 01/33] x86-64, NUMA: Make dummy node initialization path similar to non-dummy ones Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 02/33] x86-64, NUMA: Simplify hotplug node handling in acpi_numa_memory_affinity_init() Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 03/33] x86, NUMA: Drop @start/last_pfn from initmem_init() Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 04/33] x86-64, NUMA: Unify {acpi|amd}_{numa_init|scan_nodes}() arguments and return values Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 05/33] x86-64, NUMA: Wrap acpi_numa_init() so that failure can be indicated by return value Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 06/33] x86, NUMA: Move *_numa_init() invocations into initmem_init() Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 07/33] x86-64, NUMA: Restructure initmem_init() Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 08/33] x86-64, NUMA: Use common {cpu|mem}_nodes_parsed Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 09/33] x86-64, NUMA: Remove local variable found from amd_numa_init() Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 10/33] x86-64, NUMA: Move apicid to numa mapping initialization from amd_scan_nodes() to amd_numa_init() Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 11/33] x86-64, NUMA: Use common numa_nodes[] Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 13/33] x86-64, NUMA: Factor out memblk handling into numa_{add|register}_memblk() Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 16:15 ` [PATCH UPDATED " Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 14/33] x86-64, NUMA: Unify use of memblk in all init methods Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 15/33] x86-64, NUMA: Unify the rest of memblk registration Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 16/33] x86-64, NUMA: Kill {acpi|amd|dummy}_scan_nodes() Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 17/33] x86-64, NUMA: Remove %NULL @nodeids handling from compute_hash_shift() Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 18/33] x86-64, NUMA: Introduce struct numa_meminfo Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 19/33] x86-64, NUMA: Separate out numa_cleanup_meminfo() Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 20/33] x86-64, NUMA: make numa_cleanup_meminfo() prettier Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 21/33] x86-64, NUMA: consolidate and improve memblk sanity checks Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 22/33] x86-64, NUMA: Add common find_node_by_addr() Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 23/33] x86-64, NUMA: Kill numa_nodes[] Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 24/33] x86-64, NUMA: Rename cpu_nodes_parsed to numa_nodes_parsed Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 25/33] x86-64, NUMA: Kill mem_nodes_parsed Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:21 ` [PATCH 26/33] x86-64, NUMA: Implement generic node distance handling Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:21 ` [PATCH 27/33] x86-64, NUMA: Trivial changes to prepare for emulation updates Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:21 ` [PATCH 28/33] x86-64, NUMA: Build and use direct emulated nid -> phys nid mapping Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 14:14 ` [PATCH UPDATED " Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:21 ` [PATCH 29/33] x86-64, NUMA: Make emulation code build numa_meminfo and share the registration path Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:21 ` [PATCH 30/33] x86-64, NUMA: Wrap node ID during emulation Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:21 ` [PATCH 31/33] x86-64, NUMA: Emulate directly from numa_meminfo Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:21 ` [PATCH 32/33] x86-64, NUMA: Unify emulated apicid -> node mapping transformation Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:21 ` [PATCH 33/33] x86-64, NUMA: Unify emulated distance mapping Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:52 ` [PATCHSET x86/numa] x86-64, NUMA: bring sanity to NUMA config/emulation Ingo Molnar
2011-02-16 14:17 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 15:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-02-16 16:23 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 17:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-02-16 17:33 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-17 12:35 ` [boot crash] " Ingo Molnar
2011-02-17 12:48 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-17 16:10 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1297858867-25981-13-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=ankita@in.ibm.com \
--cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
--cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=shaohui.zheng@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox