From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, yinghai@kernel.org,
brgerst@gmail.com, gorcunov@gmail.com, shaohui.zheng@intel.com,
rientjes@google.com, mingo@elte.hu, hpa@linux.intel.com,
ankita@in.ibm.com
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 14/33] x86-64, NUMA: Unify use of memblk in all init methods
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 13:20:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1297858867-25981-15-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1297858867-25981-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
Make both amd and dummy use numa_add_memblk() to describe the detected
memory blocks. This allows initmem_init() to call
numa_register_memblk() regardless of init method in use. Drop custom
memory registration codes from amd and dummy.
After this change, memblk merge/cleanup in numa_register_memblks() is
applied to all init methods.
As this makes compute_hash_shift() and numa_register_memblks() used
only inside numa_64.c, make them static.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
Cc: Shaohui Zheng <shaohui.zheng@intel.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/numa_64.h | 4 ----
arch/x86/mm/amdtopology_64.c | 13 +------------
arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c | 15 +++++++--------
arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c | 5 -----
4 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/numa_64.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/numa_64.h
index 2b6a1c5..fbc9d33 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/numa_64.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/numa_64.h
@@ -8,9 +8,6 @@ struct bootnode {
u64 end;
};
-extern int compute_hash_shift(struct bootnode *nodes, int numblks,
- int *nodeids);
-
#define ZONE_ALIGN (1UL << (MAX_ORDER+PAGE_SHIFT))
extern int numa_off;
@@ -34,7 +31,6 @@ extern struct bootnode numa_nodes[MAX_NUMNODES] __initdata;
extern int __cpuinit numa_cpu_node(int cpu);
extern int __init numa_add_memblk(int nodeid, u64 start, u64 end);
-extern int __init numa_register_memblks(void);
#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_EMU
#define FAKE_NODE_MIN_SIZE ((u64)32 << 20)
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/amdtopology_64.c b/arch/x86/mm/amdtopology_64.c
index cf29527..d6d7aa4 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/amdtopology_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/amdtopology_64.c
@@ -167,6 +167,7 @@ int __init amd_numa_init(void)
numa_nodes[nodeid].start = base;
numa_nodes[nodeid].end = limit;
+ numa_add_memblk(nodeid, base, limit);
prevbase = base;
@@ -263,18 +264,6 @@ int __init amd_scan_nodes(void)
{
int i;
- memnode_shift = compute_hash_shift(numa_nodes, 8, NULL);
- if (memnode_shift < 0) {
- pr_err("No NUMA node hash function found. Contact maintainer\n");
- return -1;
- }
- pr_info("Using node hash shift of %d\n", memnode_shift);
-
- /* use the coreid bits from early_identify_cpu */
- for_each_node_mask(i, node_possible_map)
- memblock_x86_register_active_regions(i,
- numa_nodes[i].start >> PAGE_SHIFT,
- numa_nodes[i].end >> PAGE_SHIFT);
init_memory_mapping_high();
for_each_node_mask(i, node_possible_map)
setup_node_bootmem(i, numa_nodes[i].start, numa_nodes[i].end);
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c
index a1d702d..552080e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c
@@ -131,8 +131,8 @@ static int __init extract_lsb_from_nodes(const struct bootnode *nodes,
return i;
}
-int __init compute_hash_shift(struct bootnode *nodes, int numnodes,
- int *nodeids)
+static int __init compute_hash_shift(struct bootnode *nodes, int numnodes,
+ int *nodeids)
{
int shift;
@@ -287,7 +287,7 @@ setup_node_bootmem(int nodeid, unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
node_set_online(nodeid);
}
-int __init numa_register_memblks(void)
+static int __init numa_register_memblks(void)
{
int i;
@@ -713,17 +713,13 @@ static int dummy_numa_init(void)
node_set(0, cpu_nodes_parsed);
node_set(0, mem_nodes_parsed);
+ numa_add_memblk(0, 0, (u64)max_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT);
return 0;
}
static int dummy_scan_nodes(void)
{
- /* setup dummy node covering all memory */
- memnode_shift = 63;
- memnodemap = memnode.embedded_map;
- memnodemap[0] = 0;
- memblock_x86_register_active_regions(0, 0, max_pfn);
init_memory_mapping_high();
setup_node_bootmem(0, 0, max_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT);
numa_init_array();
@@ -784,6 +780,9 @@ void __init initmem_init(void)
if (WARN_ON(nodes_empty(node_possible_map)))
continue;
+ if (numa_register_memblks() < 0)
+ continue;
+
if (!scan_nodes[i]())
return;
}
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c b/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c
index 341b371..69f1471 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c
@@ -308,11 +308,6 @@ int __init acpi_scan_nodes(void)
if (acpi_numa <= 0)
return -1;
- if (numa_register_memblks() < 0) {
- bad_srat();
- return -1;
- }
-
/* for out of order entries in SRAT */
sort_node_map();
if (!nodes_cover_memory(numa_nodes)) {
--
1.7.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-16 12:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-16 12:20 [PATCHSET x86/numa] x86-64, NUMA: bring sanity to NUMA config/emulation Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 01/33] x86-64, NUMA: Make dummy node initialization path similar to non-dummy ones Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 02/33] x86-64, NUMA: Simplify hotplug node handling in acpi_numa_memory_affinity_init() Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 03/33] x86, NUMA: Drop @start/last_pfn from initmem_init() Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 04/33] x86-64, NUMA: Unify {acpi|amd}_{numa_init|scan_nodes}() arguments and return values Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 05/33] x86-64, NUMA: Wrap acpi_numa_init() so that failure can be indicated by return value Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 06/33] x86, NUMA: Move *_numa_init() invocations into initmem_init() Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 07/33] x86-64, NUMA: Restructure initmem_init() Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 08/33] x86-64, NUMA: Use common {cpu|mem}_nodes_parsed Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 09/33] x86-64, NUMA: Remove local variable found from amd_numa_init() Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 10/33] x86-64, NUMA: Move apicid to numa mapping initialization from amd_scan_nodes() to amd_numa_init() Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 11/33] x86-64, NUMA: Use common numa_nodes[] Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 12/33] x86-64, NUMA: Kill {acpi|amd}_get_nodes() Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 13/33] x86-64, NUMA: Factor out memblk handling into numa_{add|register}_memblk() Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 16:15 ` [PATCH UPDATED " Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 15/33] x86-64, NUMA: Unify the rest of memblk registration Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 16/33] x86-64, NUMA: Kill {acpi|amd|dummy}_scan_nodes() Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 17/33] x86-64, NUMA: Remove %NULL @nodeids handling from compute_hash_shift() Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 18/33] x86-64, NUMA: Introduce struct numa_meminfo Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 19/33] x86-64, NUMA: Separate out numa_cleanup_meminfo() Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 20/33] x86-64, NUMA: make numa_cleanup_meminfo() prettier Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 21/33] x86-64, NUMA: consolidate and improve memblk sanity checks Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 22/33] x86-64, NUMA: Add common find_node_by_addr() Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 23/33] x86-64, NUMA: Kill numa_nodes[] Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 24/33] x86-64, NUMA: Rename cpu_nodes_parsed to numa_nodes_parsed Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 25/33] x86-64, NUMA: Kill mem_nodes_parsed Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:21 ` [PATCH 26/33] x86-64, NUMA: Implement generic node distance handling Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:21 ` [PATCH 27/33] x86-64, NUMA: Trivial changes to prepare for emulation updates Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:21 ` [PATCH 28/33] x86-64, NUMA: Build and use direct emulated nid -> phys nid mapping Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 14:14 ` [PATCH UPDATED " Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:21 ` [PATCH 29/33] x86-64, NUMA: Make emulation code build numa_meminfo and share the registration path Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:21 ` [PATCH 30/33] x86-64, NUMA: Wrap node ID during emulation Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:21 ` [PATCH 31/33] x86-64, NUMA: Emulate directly from numa_meminfo Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:21 ` [PATCH 32/33] x86-64, NUMA: Unify emulated apicid -> node mapping transformation Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:21 ` [PATCH 33/33] x86-64, NUMA: Unify emulated distance mapping Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:52 ` [PATCHSET x86/numa] x86-64, NUMA: bring sanity to NUMA config/emulation Ingo Molnar
2011-02-16 14:17 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 15:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-02-16 16:23 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 17:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-02-16 17:33 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-17 12:35 ` [boot crash] " Ingo Molnar
2011-02-17 12:48 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-17 16:10 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1297858867-25981-15-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=ankita@in.ibm.com \
--cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
--cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=shaohui.zheng@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox