From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932463Ab1BPMVu (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Feb 2011 07:21:50 -0500 Received: from mail-bw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.214.46]:36104 "EHLO mail-bw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932287Ab1BPMVm (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Feb 2011 07:21:42 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:x-mailer:in-reply-to :references; b=dLOmNmufV47mx7DHT1YBJTBf09/sloa+qpTuN5nb0XaRCBg9dRldCXugUdcF507TCz 1486+fPYzjbIvJhCGf8QCCOMygl/uloFCu+kaAc+gQMRYbcwzlaTEuwUWJQzqJAqz60c q5KfYPehFJYMNxc+LnBOPmdk94XABC9KVZtAo= From: Tejun Heo To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, yinghai@kernel.org, brgerst@gmail.com, gorcunov@gmail.com, shaohui.zheng@intel.com, rientjes@google.com, mingo@elte.hu, hpa@linux.intel.com, ankita@in.ibm.com Cc: Tejun Heo Subject: [PATCH 17/33] x86-64, NUMA: Remove %NULL @nodeids handling from compute_hash_shift() Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 13:20:51 +0100 Message-Id: <1297858867-25981-18-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.1 In-Reply-To: <1297858867-25981-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> References: <1297858867-25981-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org numa_emulation() called compute_hash_shift() with %NULL @nodeids which meant identity mapping between index and nodeid. Make numa_emulation() build identity array and drop %NULL @nodeids handling from populate_memnodemap() and thus from compute_hash_shift(). This is to prepare for transition to using memblks instead. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo Cc: Yinghai Lu Cc: Brian Gerst Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov Cc: Shaohui Zheng Cc: David Rientjes Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: H. Peter Anvin --- arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c | 14 +++++++------- 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c index e211c00..243d18d 100644 --- a/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c +++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c @@ -63,12 +63,7 @@ static int __init populate_memnodemap(const struct bootnode *nodes, do { if (memnodemap[addr >> shift] != NUMA_NO_NODE) return -1; - - if (!nodeids) - memnodemap[addr >> shift] = i; - else - memnodemap[addr >> shift] = nodeids[i]; - + memnodemap[addr >> shift] = nodeids[i]; addr += (1UL << shift); } while (addr < end); res = 1; @@ -706,6 +701,7 @@ static int __init split_nodes_size_interleave(u64 addr, u64 max_addr, u64 size) static int __init numa_emulation(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long last_pfn, int acpi, int amd) { + static int nodeid[NR_NODE_MEMBLKS] __initdata; u64 addr = start_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT; u64 max_addr = last_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT; int num_nodes; @@ -730,7 +726,11 @@ static int __init numa_emulation(unsigned long start_pfn, if (num_nodes < 0) return num_nodes; - memnode_shift = compute_hash_shift(nodes, num_nodes, NULL); + + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(nodeid); i++) + nodeid[i] = i; + + memnode_shift = compute_hash_shift(nodes, num_nodes, nodeid); if (memnode_shift < 0) { memnode_shift = 0; printk(KERN_ERR "No NUMA hash function found. NUMA emulation " -- 1.7.1