From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932522Ab1BPMV7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Feb 2011 07:21:59 -0500 Received: from mail-bw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.214.46]:36104 "EHLO mail-bw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932342Ab1BPMVp (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Feb 2011 07:21:45 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:x-mailer:in-reply-to :references; b=u/7ETM23fFAtqn0je1wZcum+/O6EYk5xdYghXFIwzD5guu/J+Q3Cy3DWk+eyvFGo+K RBWVbCawihIaF7XlcMZHqoLu6Xry8ndg0p5ODL7xjBWEP0Fjdf6M7mmXhWEYM6BRfffb fxqgcMcG2h+w7L0GNy6+AGoZQXoYbiLUeyyF4= From: Tejun Heo To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, yinghai@kernel.org, brgerst@gmail.com, gorcunov@gmail.com, shaohui.zheng@intel.com, rientjes@google.com, mingo@elte.hu, hpa@linux.intel.com, ankita@in.ibm.com Cc: Tejun Heo Subject: [PATCH 19/33] x86-64, NUMA: Separate out numa_cleanup_meminfo() Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 13:20:53 +0100 Message-Id: <1297858867-25981-20-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.1 In-Reply-To: <1297858867-25981-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> References: <1297858867-25981-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Separate out numa_cleanup_meminfo() from numa_register_memblks(). node_possible_map initialization is moved to the top of the split numa_register_memblks(). This patch doesn't cause behavior change. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo Cc: Yinghai Lu Cc: Brian Gerst Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov Cc: Shaohui Zheng Cc: David Rientjes Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: H. Peter Anvin --- arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c | 83 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------- 1 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c index c3496e2..f2721de 100644 --- a/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c +++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c @@ -292,40 +292,8 @@ setup_node_bootmem(int nodeid, unsigned long start, unsigned long end) node_set_online(nodeid); } -/* - * Sanity check to catch more bad NUMA configurations (they are amazingly - * common). Make sure the nodes cover all memory. - */ -static int __init nodes_cover_memory(const struct bootnode *nodes) +static int __init numa_cleanup_meminfo(struct numa_meminfo *mi) { - unsigned long numaram, e820ram; - int i; - - numaram = 0; - for_each_node_mask(i, mem_nodes_parsed) { - unsigned long s = nodes[i].start >> PAGE_SHIFT; - unsigned long e = nodes[i].end >> PAGE_SHIFT; - numaram += e - s; - numaram -= __absent_pages_in_range(i, s, e); - if ((long)numaram < 0) - numaram = 0; - } - - e820ram = max_pfn - - (memblock_x86_hole_size(0, max_pfn<> PAGE_SHIFT); - /* We seem to lose 3 pages somewhere. Allow 1M of slack. */ - if ((long)(e820ram - numaram) >= (1<<(20 - PAGE_SHIFT))) { - printk(KERN_ERR "NUMA: nodes only cover %luMB of your %luMB e820 RAM. Not used.\n", - (numaram << PAGE_SHIFT) >> 20, - (e820ram << PAGE_SHIFT) >> 20); - return 0; - } - return 1; -} - -static int __init numa_register_memblks(void) -{ - struct numa_meminfo *mi = &numa_meminfo; int i; /* @@ -368,6 +336,49 @@ static int __init numa_register_memblks(void) } } + return 0; +} + +/* + * Sanity check to catch more bad NUMA configurations (they are amazingly + * common). Make sure the nodes cover all memory. + */ +static int __init nodes_cover_memory(const struct bootnode *nodes) +{ + unsigned long numaram, e820ram; + int i; + + numaram = 0; + for_each_node_mask(i, mem_nodes_parsed) { + unsigned long s = nodes[i].start >> PAGE_SHIFT; + unsigned long e = nodes[i].end >> PAGE_SHIFT; + numaram += e - s; + numaram -= __absent_pages_in_range(i, s, e); + if ((long)numaram < 0) + numaram = 0; + } + + e820ram = max_pfn - (memblock_x86_hole_size(0, + max_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT) >> PAGE_SHIFT); + /* We seem to lose 3 pages somewhere. Allow 1M of slack. */ + if ((long)(e820ram - numaram) >= (1 << (20 - PAGE_SHIFT))) { + printk(KERN_ERR "NUMA: nodes only cover %luMB of your %luMB e820 RAM. Not used.\n", + (numaram << PAGE_SHIFT) >> 20, + (e820ram << PAGE_SHIFT) >> 20); + return 0; + } + return 1; +} + +static int __init numa_register_memblks(struct numa_meminfo *mi) +{ + int i; + + /* Account for nodes with cpus and no memory */ + nodes_or(node_possible_map, mem_nodes_parsed, cpu_nodes_parsed); + if (WARN_ON(nodes_empty(node_possible_map))) + return -EINVAL; + memnode_shift = compute_hash_shift(mi); if (memnode_shift < 0) { printk(KERN_ERR "NUMA: No NUMA node hash function found. Contact maintainer\n"); @@ -823,12 +834,10 @@ void __init initmem_init(void) nodes_clear(node_possible_map); nodes_clear(node_online_map); #endif - /* Account for nodes with cpus and no memory */ - nodes_or(node_possible_map, mem_nodes_parsed, cpu_nodes_parsed); - if (WARN_ON(nodes_empty(node_possible_map))) + if (numa_cleanup_meminfo(&numa_meminfo) < 0) continue; - if (numa_register_memblks() < 0) + if (numa_register_memblks(&numa_meminfo) < 0) continue; for (j = 0; j < nr_cpu_ids; j++) { -- 1.7.1