From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, yinghai@kernel.org,
brgerst@gmail.com, gorcunov@gmail.com, shaohui.zheng@intel.com,
rientjes@google.com, mingo@elte.hu, hpa@linux.intel.com,
ankita@in.ibm.com
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 24/33] x86-64, NUMA: Rename cpu_nodes_parsed to numa_nodes_parsed
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 13:20:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1297858867-25981-25-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1297858867-25981-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
It's no longer necessary to keep both cpu_nodes_parsed and
mem_nodes_parsed. In preparation for merge, rename cpu_nodes_parsed
to numa_nodes_parsed.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
Cc: Shaohui Zheng <shaohui.zheng@intel.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/numa_64.h | 2 +-
arch/x86/mm/amdtopology_64.c | 4 ++--
arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c | 8 ++++----
arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c | 6 +++---
4 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/numa_64.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/numa_64.h
index da5c501..da57c70 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/numa_64.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/numa_64.h
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ extern void setup_node_bootmem(int nodeid, unsigned long start,
#define NODE_MIN_SIZE (4*1024*1024)
#define NR_NODE_MEMBLKS (MAX_NUMNODES*2)
-extern nodemask_t cpu_nodes_parsed __initdata;
+extern nodemask_t numa_nodes_parsed __initdata;
extern nodemask_t mem_nodes_parsed __initdata;
extern int __cpuinit numa_cpu_node(int cpu);
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/amdtopology_64.c b/arch/x86/mm/amdtopology_64.c
index 0cb59e5..e76bffa 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/amdtopology_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/amdtopology_64.c
@@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ int __init amd_numa_init(void)
prevbase = base;
numa_add_memblk(nodeid, base, limit);
node_set(nodeid, mem_nodes_parsed);
- node_set(nodeid, cpu_nodes_parsed);
+ node_set(nodeid, numa_nodes_parsed);
}
if (!nodes_weight(mem_nodes_parsed))
@@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ int __init amd_numa_init(void)
apicid_base = boot_cpu_physical_apicid;
}
- for_each_node_mask(i, cpu_nodes_parsed)
+ for_each_node_mask(i, numa_nodes_parsed)
for (j = apicid_base; j < cores + apicid_base; j++)
set_apicid_to_node((i << bits) + j, i);
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c
index c490448..6e4fbd7 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ struct numa_meminfo {
struct pglist_data *node_data[MAX_NUMNODES] __read_mostly;
EXPORT_SYMBOL(node_data);
-nodemask_t cpu_nodes_parsed __initdata;
+nodemask_t numa_nodes_parsed __initdata;
nodemask_t mem_nodes_parsed __initdata;
struct memnode memnode;
@@ -379,7 +379,7 @@ static int __init numa_register_memblks(struct numa_meminfo *mi)
int i, j, nid;
/* Account for nodes with cpus and no memory */
- nodes_or(node_possible_map, mem_nodes_parsed, cpu_nodes_parsed);
+ nodes_or(node_possible_map, mem_nodes_parsed, numa_nodes_parsed);
if (WARN_ON(nodes_empty(node_possible_map)))
return -EINVAL;
@@ -823,7 +823,7 @@ static int dummy_numa_init(void)
printk(KERN_INFO "Faking a node at %016lx-%016lx\n",
0LU, max_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT);
- node_set(0, cpu_nodes_parsed);
+ node_set(0, numa_nodes_parsed);
node_set(0, mem_nodes_parsed);
numa_add_memblk(0, 0, (u64)max_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT);
@@ -851,7 +851,7 @@ void __init initmem_init(void)
for (j = 0; j < MAX_LOCAL_APIC; j++)
set_apicid_to_node(j, NUMA_NO_NODE);
- nodes_clear(cpu_nodes_parsed);
+ nodes_clear(numa_nodes_parsed);
nodes_clear(mem_nodes_parsed);
nodes_clear(node_possible_map);
nodes_clear(node_online_map);
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c b/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c
index e8b3b3c..8185189 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c
@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ acpi_numa_x2apic_affinity_init(struct acpi_srat_x2apic_cpu_affinity *pa)
return;
}
set_apicid_to_node(apic_id, node);
- node_set(node, cpu_nodes_parsed);
+ node_set(node, numa_nodes_parsed);
acpi_numa = 1;
printk(KERN_INFO "SRAT: PXM %u -> APIC 0x%04x -> Node %u\n",
pxm, apic_id, node);
@@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ acpi_numa_processor_affinity_init(struct acpi_srat_cpu_affinity *pa)
}
set_apicid_to_node(apic_id, node);
- node_set(node, cpu_nodes_parsed);
+ node_set(node, numa_nodes_parsed);
acpi_numa = 1;
printk(KERN_INFO "SRAT: PXM %u -> APIC 0x%02x -> Node %u\n",
pxm, apic_id, node);
@@ -196,7 +196,7 @@ update_nodes_add(int node, unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
}
if (changed) {
- node_set(node, cpu_nodes_parsed);
+ node_set(node, numa_nodes_parsed);
printk(KERN_INFO "SRAT: hot plug zone found %Lx - %Lx\n",
nd->start, nd->end);
}
--
1.7.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-16 12:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-16 12:20 [PATCHSET x86/numa] x86-64, NUMA: bring sanity to NUMA config/emulation Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 01/33] x86-64, NUMA: Make dummy node initialization path similar to non-dummy ones Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 02/33] x86-64, NUMA: Simplify hotplug node handling in acpi_numa_memory_affinity_init() Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 03/33] x86, NUMA: Drop @start/last_pfn from initmem_init() Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 04/33] x86-64, NUMA: Unify {acpi|amd}_{numa_init|scan_nodes}() arguments and return values Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 05/33] x86-64, NUMA: Wrap acpi_numa_init() so that failure can be indicated by return value Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 06/33] x86, NUMA: Move *_numa_init() invocations into initmem_init() Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 07/33] x86-64, NUMA: Restructure initmem_init() Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 08/33] x86-64, NUMA: Use common {cpu|mem}_nodes_parsed Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 09/33] x86-64, NUMA: Remove local variable found from amd_numa_init() Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 10/33] x86-64, NUMA: Move apicid to numa mapping initialization from amd_scan_nodes() to amd_numa_init() Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 11/33] x86-64, NUMA: Use common numa_nodes[] Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 12/33] x86-64, NUMA: Kill {acpi|amd}_get_nodes() Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 13/33] x86-64, NUMA: Factor out memblk handling into numa_{add|register}_memblk() Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 16:15 ` [PATCH UPDATED " Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 14/33] x86-64, NUMA: Unify use of memblk in all init methods Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 15/33] x86-64, NUMA: Unify the rest of memblk registration Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 16/33] x86-64, NUMA: Kill {acpi|amd|dummy}_scan_nodes() Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 17/33] x86-64, NUMA: Remove %NULL @nodeids handling from compute_hash_shift() Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 18/33] x86-64, NUMA: Introduce struct numa_meminfo Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 19/33] x86-64, NUMA: Separate out numa_cleanup_meminfo() Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 20/33] x86-64, NUMA: make numa_cleanup_meminfo() prettier Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 21/33] x86-64, NUMA: consolidate and improve memblk sanity checks Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 22/33] x86-64, NUMA: Add common find_node_by_addr() Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 23/33] x86-64, NUMA: Kill numa_nodes[] Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 25/33] x86-64, NUMA: Kill mem_nodes_parsed Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:21 ` [PATCH 26/33] x86-64, NUMA: Implement generic node distance handling Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:21 ` [PATCH 27/33] x86-64, NUMA: Trivial changes to prepare for emulation updates Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:21 ` [PATCH 28/33] x86-64, NUMA: Build and use direct emulated nid -> phys nid mapping Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 14:14 ` [PATCH UPDATED " Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:21 ` [PATCH 29/33] x86-64, NUMA: Make emulation code build numa_meminfo and share the registration path Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:21 ` [PATCH 30/33] x86-64, NUMA: Wrap node ID during emulation Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:21 ` [PATCH 31/33] x86-64, NUMA: Emulate directly from numa_meminfo Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:21 ` [PATCH 32/33] x86-64, NUMA: Unify emulated apicid -> node mapping transformation Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:21 ` [PATCH 33/33] x86-64, NUMA: Unify emulated distance mapping Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:52 ` [PATCHSET x86/numa] x86-64, NUMA: bring sanity to NUMA config/emulation Ingo Molnar
2011-02-16 14:17 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 15:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-02-16 16:23 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 17:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-02-16 17:33 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-17 12:35 ` [boot crash] " Ingo Molnar
2011-02-17 12:48 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-17 16:10 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1297858867-25981-25-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=ankita@in.ibm.com \
--cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
--cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=shaohui.zheng@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox