public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, yinghai@kernel.org,
	brgerst@gmail.com, gorcunov@gmail.com, shaohui.zheng@intel.com,
	rientjes@google.com, mingo@elte.hu, hpa@linux.intel.com,
	ankita@in.ibm.com
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 27/33] x86-64, NUMA: Trivial changes to prepare for emulation updates
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 13:21:01 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1297858867-25981-28-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1297858867-25981-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>

* Separate out numa_add_memblk_to() from numa_add_memblk() so that
  different numa_meminfo can be used.

* Rename cmdline to emu_cmdline.

* Drop @start/last_pfn from numa_emulation() and use max_pfn directly.

This patch doesn't introduce any behavior change.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
Cc: Shaohui Zheng <shaohui.zheng@intel.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c |   34 ++++++++++++++++++----------------
 1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c
index a3621f2..20e2cfe 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c
@@ -193,10 +193,9 @@ static void * __init early_node_mem(int nodeid, unsigned long start,
 	return NULL;
 }
 
-int __init numa_add_memblk(int nid, u64 start, u64 end)
+static int __init numa_add_memblk_to(int nid, u64 start, u64 end,
+				     struct numa_meminfo *mi)
 {
-	struct numa_meminfo *mi = &numa_meminfo;
-
 	/* ignore zero length blks */
 	if (start == end)
 		return 0;
@@ -227,6 +226,11 @@ static void __init numa_remove_memblk_from(int idx, struct numa_meminfo *mi)
 		(mi->nr_blks - idx) * sizeof(mi->blk[0]));
 }
 
+int __init numa_add_memblk(int nid, u64 start, u64 end)
+{
+	return numa_add_memblk_to(nid, start, end, &numa_meminfo);
+}
+
 /* Initialize bootmem allocator for a node */
 void __init
 setup_node_bootmem(int nodeid, unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
@@ -539,11 +543,11 @@ static int __init numa_register_memblks(struct numa_meminfo *mi)
 /* Numa emulation */
 static struct bootnode nodes[MAX_NUMNODES] __initdata;
 static struct bootnode physnodes[MAX_NUMNODES] __cpuinitdata;
-static char *cmdline __initdata;
+static char *emu_cmdline __initdata;
 
 void __init numa_emu_cmdline(char *str)
 {
-	cmdline = str;
+	emu_cmdline = str;
 }
 
 int __init find_node_by_addr(unsigned long addr)
@@ -861,12 +865,10 @@ static int __init split_nodes_size_interleave(u64 addr, u64 max_addr, u64 size)
  * Sets up the system RAM area from start_pfn to last_pfn according to the
  * numa=fake command-line option.
  */
-static int __init numa_emulation(unsigned long start_pfn,
-			unsigned long last_pfn, int acpi, int amd)
+static int __init numa_emulation(int acpi, int amd)
 {
 	static struct numa_meminfo ei __initdata;
-	u64 addr = start_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT;
-	u64 max_addr = last_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT;
+	const u64 max_addr = max_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT;
 	int num_nodes;
 	int i;
 
@@ -875,16 +877,16 @@ static int __init numa_emulation(unsigned long start_pfn,
 	 * the fixed node size.  Otherwise, if it is just a single number N,
 	 * split the system RAM into N fake nodes.
 	 */
-	if (strchr(cmdline, 'M') || strchr(cmdline, 'G')) {
+	if (strchr(emu_cmdline, 'M') || strchr(emu_cmdline, 'G')) {
 		u64 size;
 
-		size = memparse(cmdline, &cmdline);
-		num_nodes = split_nodes_size_interleave(addr, max_addr, size);
+		size = memparse(emu_cmdline, &emu_cmdline);
+		num_nodes = split_nodes_size_interleave(0, max_addr, size);
 	} else {
 		unsigned long n;
 
-		n = simple_strtoul(cmdline, NULL, 0);
-		num_nodes = split_nodes_interleave(addr, max_addr, n);
+		n = simple_strtoul(emu_cmdline, NULL, 0);
+		num_nodes = split_nodes_interleave(0, max_addr, n);
 	}
 
 	if (num_nodes < 0)
@@ -916,7 +918,7 @@ static int __init numa_emulation(unsigned long start_pfn,
 	init_memory_mapping_high();
 	for_each_node_mask(i, node_possible_map)
 		setup_node_bootmem(i, nodes[i].start, nodes[i].end);
-	setup_physnodes(addr, max_addr);
+	setup_physnodes(0, max_addr);
 	fake_physnodes(acpi, amd, num_nodes);
 	numa_init_array();
 	numa_emu_dist = true;
@@ -972,7 +974,7 @@ void __init initmem_init(void)
 			continue;
 #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_EMU
 		setup_physnodes(0, max_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT);
-		if (cmdline && !numa_emulation(0, max_pfn, i == 0, i == 1))
+		if (emu_cmdline && !numa_emulation(i == 0, i == 1))
 			return;
 		setup_physnodes(0, max_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT);
 		nodes_clear(node_possible_map);
-- 
1.7.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-02-16 12:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-02-16 12:20 [PATCHSET x86/numa] x86-64, NUMA: bring sanity to NUMA config/emulation Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 01/33] x86-64, NUMA: Make dummy node initialization path similar to non-dummy ones Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 02/33] x86-64, NUMA: Simplify hotplug node handling in acpi_numa_memory_affinity_init() Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 03/33] x86, NUMA: Drop @start/last_pfn from initmem_init() Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 04/33] x86-64, NUMA: Unify {acpi|amd}_{numa_init|scan_nodes}() arguments and return values Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 05/33] x86-64, NUMA: Wrap acpi_numa_init() so that failure can be indicated by return value Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 06/33] x86, NUMA: Move *_numa_init() invocations into initmem_init() Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 07/33] x86-64, NUMA: Restructure initmem_init() Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 08/33] x86-64, NUMA: Use common {cpu|mem}_nodes_parsed Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 09/33] x86-64, NUMA: Remove local variable found from amd_numa_init() Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 10/33] x86-64, NUMA: Move apicid to numa mapping initialization from amd_scan_nodes() to amd_numa_init() Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 11/33] x86-64, NUMA: Use common numa_nodes[] Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 12/33] x86-64, NUMA: Kill {acpi|amd}_get_nodes() Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 13/33] x86-64, NUMA: Factor out memblk handling into numa_{add|register}_memblk() Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 16:15   ` [PATCH UPDATED " Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 14/33] x86-64, NUMA: Unify use of memblk in all init methods Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 15/33] x86-64, NUMA: Unify the rest of memblk registration Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 16/33] x86-64, NUMA: Kill {acpi|amd|dummy}_scan_nodes() Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 17/33] x86-64, NUMA: Remove %NULL @nodeids handling from compute_hash_shift() Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 18/33] x86-64, NUMA: Introduce struct numa_meminfo Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 19/33] x86-64, NUMA: Separate out numa_cleanup_meminfo() Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 20/33] x86-64, NUMA: make numa_cleanup_meminfo() prettier Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 21/33] x86-64, NUMA: consolidate and improve memblk sanity checks Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 22/33] x86-64, NUMA: Add common find_node_by_addr() Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 23/33] x86-64, NUMA: Kill numa_nodes[] Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 24/33] x86-64, NUMA: Rename cpu_nodes_parsed to numa_nodes_parsed Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 25/33] x86-64, NUMA: Kill mem_nodes_parsed Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:21 ` [PATCH 26/33] x86-64, NUMA: Implement generic node distance handling Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:21 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2011-02-16 12:21 ` [PATCH 28/33] x86-64, NUMA: Build and use direct emulated nid -> phys nid mapping Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 14:14   ` [PATCH UPDATED " Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:21 ` [PATCH 29/33] x86-64, NUMA: Make emulation code build numa_meminfo and share the registration path Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:21 ` [PATCH 30/33] x86-64, NUMA: Wrap node ID during emulation Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:21 ` [PATCH 31/33] x86-64, NUMA: Emulate directly from numa_meminfo Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:21 ` [PATCH 32/33] x86-64, NUMA: Unify emulated apicid -> node mapping transformation Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:21 ` [PATCH 33/33] x86-64, NUMA: Unify emulated distance mapping Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:52 ` [PATCHSET x86/numa] x86-64, NUMA: bring sanity to NUMA config/emulation Ingo Molnar
2011-02-16 14:17   ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 15:53     ` Ingo Molnar
2011-02-16 16:23       ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 17:29         ` Ingo Molnar
2011-02-16 17:33           ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-17 12:35           ` [boot crash] " Ingo Molnar
2011-02-17 12:48             ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-17 16:10               ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1297858867-25981-28-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=ankita@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
    --cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
    --cc=hpa@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=shaohui.zheng@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox