From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, yinghai@kernel.org,
brgerst@gmail.com, gorcunov@gmail.com, shaohui.zheng@intel.com,
rientjes@google.com, mingo@elte.hu, hpa@linux.intel.com,
ankita@in.ibm.com
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 04/33] x86-64, NUMA: Unify {acpi|amd}_{numa_init|scan_nodes}() arguments and return values
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 13:20:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1297858867-25981-5-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1297858867-25981-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
The functions used during NUMA initialization - *_numa_init() and
*_scan_nodes() - have different arguments and return values. Unify
them such that they all take no argument and return 0 on success and
-errno on failure. This is in preparation for further NUMA init
cleanups.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
Cc: Shaohui Zheng <shaohui.zheng@intel.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h | 2 +-
arch/x86/include/asm/amd_nb.h | 2 +-
arch/x86/kernel/setup.c | 4 ++--
arch/x86/mm/amdtopology_64.c | 18 +++++++++---------
arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c | 2 +-
arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c | 4 ++--
drivers/acpi/numa.c | 9 ++++++---
7 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h
index 211ca3f..4e5dff9 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h
@@ -187,7 +187,7 @@ struct bootnode;
extern int acpi_numa;
extern void acpi_get_nodes(struct bootnode *physnodes, unsigned long start,
unsigned long end);
-extern int acpi_scan_nodes(unsigned long start, unsigned long end);
+extern int acpi_scan_nodes(void);
#define NR_NODE_MEMBLKS (MAX_NUMNODES*2)
#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_EMU
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/amd_nb.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/amd_nb.h
index 2b33c4d..dc3c6e3 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/amd_nb.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/amd_nb.h
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ struct bootnode;
extern int early_is_amd_nb(u32 value);
extern int amd_cache_northbridges(void);
extern void amd_flush_garts(void);
-extern int amd_numa_init(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn);
+extern int amd_numa_init(void);
extern int amd_scan_nodes(void);
extern int amd_get_subcaches(int);
extern int amd_set_subcaches(int, int);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
index 756d640..96810a3 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
@@ -995,12 +995,12 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
/*
* Parse SRAT to discover nodes.
*/
- acpi = acpi_numa_init();
+ acpi = !acpi_numa_init();
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_AMD_NUMA
if (!acpi)
- amd = !amd_numa_init(0, max_pfn);
+ amd = !amd_numa_init();
#endif
initmem_init(acpi, amd);
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/amdtopology_64.c b/arch/x86/mm/amdtopology_64.c
index 2523c35..655ccff 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/amdtopology_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/amdtopology_64.c
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ static __init int find_northbridge(void)
return num;
}
- return -1;
+ return -ENOENT;
}
static __init void early_get_boot_cpu_id(void)
@@ -69,17 +69,17 @@ static __init void early_get_boot_cpu_id(void)
#endif
}
-int __init amd_numa_init(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn)
+int __init amd_numa_init(void)
{
- unsigned long start = PFN_PHYS(start_pfn);
- unsigned long end = PFN_PHYS(end_pfn);
+ unsigned long start = PFN_PHYS(0);
+ unsigned long end = PFN_PHYS(max_pfn);
unsigned numnodes;
unsigned long prevbase;
int i, nb, found = 0;
u32 nodeid, reg;
if (!early_pci_allowed())
- return -1;
+ return -EINVAL;
nb = find_northbridge();
if (nb < 0)
@@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ int __init amd_numa_init(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn)
reg = read_pci_config(0, nb, 0, 0x60);
numnodes = ((reg >> 4) & 0xF) + 1;
if (numnodes <= 1)
- return -1;
+ return -ENOENT;
pr_info("Number of physical nodes %d\n", numnodes);
@@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ int __init amd_numa_init(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn)
if ((base >> 8) & 3 || (limit >> 8) & 3) {
pr_err("Node %d using interleaving mode %lx/%lx\n",
nodeid, (base >> 8) & 3, (limit >> 8) & 3);
- return -1;
+ return -EINVAL;
}
if (node_isset(nodeid, nodes_parsed)) {
pr_info("Node %d already present, skipping\n",
@@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ int __init amd_numa_init(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn)
if (prevbase > base) {
pr_err("Node map not sorted %lx,%lx\n",
prevbase, base);
- return -1;
+ return -EINVAL;
}
pr_info("Node %d MemBase %016lx Limit %016lx\n",
@@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ int __init amd_numa_init(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn)
}
if (!found)
- return -1;
+ return -ENOENT;
return 0;
}
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c
index d7e4aaf..a083f51 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c
@@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ void __init initmem_init(int acpi, int amd)
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA
- if (!numa_off && acpi && !acpi_scan_nodes(0, max_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT))
+ if (!numa_off && acpi && !acpi_scan_nodes())
return;
nodes_clear(node_possible_map);
nodes_clear(node_online_map);
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c b/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c
index 988b0b7..4f9dbf0 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c
@@ -359,7 +359,7 @@ void __init acpi_get_nodes(struct bootnode *physnodes, unsigned long start,
#endif /* CONFIG_NUMA_EMU */
/* Use the information discovered above to actually set up the nodes. */
-int __init acpi_scan_nodes(unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
+int __init acpi_scan_nodes(void)
{
int i;
@@ -368,7 +368,7 @@ int __init acpi_scan_nodes(unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
/* First clean up the node list */
for (i = 0; i < MAX_NUMNODES; i++)
- cutoff_node(i, start, end);
+ cutoff_node(i, 0, max_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT);
/*
* Join together blocks on the same node, holes between
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/numa.c b/drivers/acpi/numa.c
index 5eb25eb..3b5c318 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/numa.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/numa.c
@@ -274,7 +274,7 @@ acpi_table_parse_srat(enum acpi_srat_type id,
int __init acpi_numa_init(void)
{
- int ret = 0;
+ int cnt = 0;
/*
* Should not limit number with cpu num that is from NR_CPUS or nr_cpus=
@@ -288,7 +288,7 @@ int __init acpi_numa_init(void)
acpi_parse_x2apic_affinity, 0);
acpi_table_parse_srat(ACPI_SRAT_TYPE_CPU_AFFINITY,
acpi_parse_processor_affinity, 0);
- ret = acpi_table_parse_srat(ACPI_SRAT_TYPE_MEMORY_AFFINITY,
+ cnt = acpi_table_parse_srat(ACPI_SRAT_TYPE_MEMORY_AFFINITY,
acpi_parse_memory_affinity,
NR_NODE_MEMBLKS);
}
@@ -297,7 +297,10 @@ int __init acpi_numa_init(void)
acpi_table_parse(ACPI_SIG_SLIT, acpi_parse_slit);
acpi_numa_arch_fixup();
- return ret;
+
+ if (cnt <= 0)
+ return cnt ?: -ENOENT;
+ return 0;
}
int acpi_get_pxm(acpi_handle h)
--
1.7.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-16 12:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-16 12:20 [PATCHSET x86/numa] x86-64, NUMA: bring sanity to NUMA config/emulation Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 01/33] x86-64, NUMA: Make dummy node initialization path similar to non-dummy ones Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 02/33] x86-64, NUMA: Simplify hotplug node handling in acpi_numa_memory_affinity_init() Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 03/33] x86, NUMA: Drop @start/last_pfn from initmem_init() Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 05/33] x86-64, NUMA: Wrap acpi_numa_init() so that failure can be indicated by return value Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 06/33] x86, NUMA: Move *_numa_init() invocations into initmem_init() Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 07/33] x86-64, NUMA: Restructure initmem_init() Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 08/33] x86-64, NUMA: Use common {cpu|mem}_nodes_parsed Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 09/33] x86-64, NUMA: Remove local variable found from amd_numa_init() Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 10/33] x86-64, NUMA: Move apicid to numa mapping initialization from amd_scan_nodes() to amd_numa_init() Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 11/33] x86-64, NUMA: Use common numa_nodes[] Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 12/33] x86-64, NUMA: Kill {acpi|amd}_get_nodes() Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 13/33] x86-64, NUMA: Factor out memblk handling into numa_{add|register}_memblk() Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 16:15 ` [PATCH UPDATED " Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 14/33] x86-64, NUMA: Unify use of memblk in all init methods Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 15/33] x86-64, NUMA: Unify the rest of memblk registration Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 16/33] x86-64, NUMA: Kill {acpi|amd|dummy}_scan_nodes() Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 17/33] x86-64, NUMA: Remove %NULL @nodeids handling from compute_hash_shift() Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 18/33] x86-64, NUMA: Introduce struct numa_meminfo Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 19/33] x86-64, NUMA: Separate out numa_cleanup_meminfo() Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 20/33] x86-64, NUMA: make numa_cleanup_meminfo() prettier Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 21/33] x86-64, NUMA: consolidate and improve memblk sanity checks Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 22/33] x86-64, NUMA: Add common find_node_by_addr() Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 23/33] x86-64, NUMA: Kill numa_nodes[] Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 24/33] x86-64, NUMA: Rename cpu_nodes_parsed to numa_nodes_parsed Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 25/33] x86-64, NUMA: Kill mem_nodes_parsed Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:21 ` [PATCH 26/33] x86-64, NUMA: Implement generic node distance handling Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:21 ` [PATCH 27/33] x86-64, NUMA: Trivial changes to prepare for emulation updates Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:21 ` [PATCH 28/33] x86-64, NUMA: Build and use direct emulated nid -> phys nid mapping Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 14:14 ` [PATCH UPDATED " Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:21 ` [PATCH 29/33] x86-64, NUMA: Make emulation code build numa_meminfo and share the registration path Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:21 ` [PATCH 30/33] x86-64, NUMA: Wrap node ID during emulation Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:21 ` [PATCH 31/33] x86-64, NUMA: Emulate directly from numa_meminfo Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:21 ` [PATCH 32/33] x86-64, NUMA: Unify emulated apicid -> node mapping transformation Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:21 ` [PATCH 33/33] x86-64, NUMA: Unify emulated distance mapping Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:52 ` [PATCHSET x86/numa] x86-64, NUMA: bring sanity to NUMA config/emulation Ingo Molnar
2011-02-16 14:17 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 15:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-02-16 16:23 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 17:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-02-16 17:33 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-17 12:35 ` [boot crash] " Ingo Molnar
2011-02-17 12:48 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-17 16:10 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1297858867-25981-5-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=ankita@in.ibm.com \
--cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
--cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=shaohui.zheng@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox