From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, yinghai@kernel.org,
brgerst@gmail.com, gorcunov@gmail.com, shaohui.zheng@intel.com,
rientjes@google.com, mingo@elte.hu, hpa@linux.intel.com,
ankita@in.ibm.com
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 06/33] x86, NUMA: Move *_numa_init() invocations into initmem_init()
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 13:20:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1297858867-25981-7-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1297858867-25981-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
There's no reason for these to live in setup_arch(). Move them inside
initmem_init().
- v2: x86-32 initmem_init() weren't updated breaking 32bit builds.
Fixed. Found by Ankita.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Ankita Garg <ankita@in.ibm.com>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
Cc: Shaohui Zheng <shaohui.zheng@intel.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/page_types.h | 2 +-
arch/x86/kernel/setup.c | 16 +---------------
arch/x86/mm/init_32.c | 2 +-
arch/x86/mm/init_64.c | 2 +-
arch/x86/mm/numa_32.c | 2 +-
arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c | 16 +++++++++++++++-
6 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/page_types.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/page_types.h
index eb9ed00..97e6007 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/page_types.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/page_types.h
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ extern unsigned long init_memory_mapping(unsigned long start,
void init_memory_mapping_high(void);
-extern void initmem_init(int acpi, int k8);
+extern void initmem_init(void);
extern void free_initmem(void);
#endif /* !__ASSEMBLY__ */
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
index c9a139c..46e684f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
@@ -719,8 +719,6 @@ early_param("reservelow", parse_reservelow);
void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
{
- int acpi = 0;
- int amd = 0;
unsigned long flags;
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
@@ -991,19 +989,7 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
early_acpi_boot_init();
-#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA
- /*
- * Parse SRAT to discover nodes.
- */
- acpi = !x86_acpi_numa_init();
-#endif
-
-#ifdef CONFIG_AMD_NUMA
- if (!acpi)
- amd = !amd_numa_init();
-#endif
-
- initmem_init(acpi, amd);
+ initmem_init();
memblock_find_dma_reserve();
dma32_reserve_bootmem();
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/init_32.c b/arch/x86/mm/init_32.c
index 16adb66..5d43fa5 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/init_32.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/init_32.c
@@ -644,7 +644,7 @@ void __init find_low_pfn_range(void)
}
#ifndef CONFIG_NEED_MULTIPLE_NODES
-void __init initmem_init(int acpi, int k8)
+void __init initmem_init(void)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_HIGHMEM
highstart_pfn = highend_pfn = max_pfn;
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c b/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
index 04cc027..4f1f461 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
@@ -603,7 +603,7 @@ kernel_physical_mapping_init(unsigned long start,
}
#ifndef CONFIG_NUMA
-void __init initmem_init(int acpi, int k8)
+void __init initmem_init(void)
{
memblock_x86_register_active_regions(0, 0, max_pfn);
init_memory_mapping_high();
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa_32.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa_32.c
index 3249b37..bde3906 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/numa_32.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa_32.c
@@ -352,7 +352,7 @@ static void init_remap_allocator(int nid)
(ulong) node_remap_end_vaddr[nid]);
}
-void __init initmem_init(int acpi, int k8)
+void __init initmem_init(void)
{
int nid;
long kva_target_pfn;
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c
index a083f51..656b0cf 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/nodemask.h>
#include <linux/sched.h>
+#include <linux/acpi.h>
#include <asm/e820.h>
#include <asm/proto.h>
@@ -579,10 +580,23 @@ static int __init numa_emulation(unsigned long start_pfn,
}
#endif /* CONFIG_NUMA_EMU */
-void __init initmem_init(int acpi, int amd)
+void __init initmem_init(void)
{
+ int acpi = 0, amd = 0;
int i;
+#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA
+ /*
+ * Parse SRAT to discover nodes.
+ */
+ acpi = !x86_acpi_numa_init();
+#endif
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_AMD_NUMA
+ if (!acpi)
+ amd = !amd_numa_init();
+#endif
+
nodes_clear(node_possible_map);
nodes_clear(node_online_map);
--
1.7.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-16 12:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-16 12:20 [PATCHSET x86/numa] x86-64, NUMA: bring sanity to NUMA config/emulation Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 01/33] x86-64, NUMA: Make dummy node initialization path similar to non-dummy ones Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 02/33] x86-64, NUMA: Simplify hotplug node handling in acpi_numa_memory_affinity_init() Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 03/33] x86, NUMA: Drop @start/last_pfn from initmem_init() Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 04/33] x86-64, NUMA: Unify {acpi|amd}_{numa_init|scan_nodes}() arguments and return values Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 05/33] x86-64, NUMA: Wrap acpi_numa_init() so that failure can be indicated by return value Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 07/33] x86-64, NUMA: Restructure initmem_init() Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 08/33] x86-64, NUMA: Use common {cpu|mem}_nodes_parsed Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 09/33] x86-64, NUMA: Remove local variable found from amd_numa_init() Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 10/33] x86-64, NUMA: Move apicid to numa mapping initialization from amd_scan_nodes() to amd_numa_init() Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 11/33] x86-64, NUMA: Use common numa_nodes[] Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 12/33] x86-64, NUMA: Kill {acpi|amd}_get_nodes() Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 13/33] x86-64, NUMA: Factor out memblk handling into numa_{add|register}_memblk() Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 16:15 ` [PATCH UPDATED " Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 14/33] x86-64, NUMA: Unify use of memblk in all init methods Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 15/33] x86-64, NUMA: Unify the rest of memblk registration Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 16/33] x86-64, NUMA: Kill {acpi|amd|dummy}_scan_nodes() Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 17/33] x86-64, NUMA: Remove %NULL @nodeids handling from compute_hash_shift() Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 18/33] x86-64, NUMA: Introduce struct numa_meminfo Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 19/33] x86-64, NUMA: Separate out numa_cleanup_meminfo() Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 20/33] x86-64, NUMA: make numa_cleanup_meminfo() prettier Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 21/33] x86-64, NUMA: consolidate and improve memblk sanity checks Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 22/33] x86-64, NUMA: Add common find_node_by_addr() Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 23/33] x86-64, NUMA: Kill numa_nodes[] Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 24/33] x86-64, NUMA: Rename cpu_nodes_parsed to numa_nodes_parsed Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:20 ` [PATCH 25/33] x86-64, NUMA: Kill mem_nodes_parsed Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:21 ` [PATCH 26/33] x86-64, NUMA: Implement generic node distance handling Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:21 ` [PATCH 27/33] x86-64, NUMA: Trivial changes to prepare for emulation updates Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:21 ` [PATCH 28/33] x86-64, NUMA: Build and use direct emulated nid -> phys nid mapping Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 14:14 ` [PATCH UPDATED " Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:21 ` [PATCH 29/33] x86-64, NUMA: Make emulation code build numa_meminfo and share the registration path Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:21 ` [PATCH 30/33] x86-64, NUMA: Wrap node ID during emulation Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:21 ` [PATCH 31/33] x86-64, NUMA: Emulate directly from numa_meminfo Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:21 ` [PATCH 32/33] x86-64, NUMA: Unify emulated apicid -> node mapping transformation Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:21 ` [PATCH 33/33] x86-64, NUMA: Unify emulated distance mapping Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 12:52 ` [PATCHSET x86/numa] x86-64, NUMA: bring sanity to NUMA config/emulation Ingo Molnar
2011-02-16 14:17 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 15:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-02-16 16:23 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 17:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-02-16 17:33 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-17 12:35 ` [boot crash] " Ingo Molnar
2011-02-17 12:48 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-17 16:10 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1297858867-25981-7-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=ankita@in.ibm.com \
--cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
--cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=shaohui.zheng@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox