public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Bharata B Rao <bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Dhaval Giani <dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>,
	Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@in.ibm.com>,
	Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>,
	Herbert Poetzl <herbert@13thfloor.at>,
	Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>, Chris Friesen <cfriesen@nortel.com>,
	Nikhil Rao <ncrao@google.com>
Subject: Re: [CFS Bandwidth Control v4 1/7] sched: introduce primitives to account for CFS bandwidth tracking
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 14:32:14 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1298467934.2217.767.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110216031840.878320737@google.com>

On Tue, 2011-02-15 at 19:18 -0800, Paul Turner wrote:

> @@ -245,6 +248,15 @@ struct cfs_rq;
>  
>  static LIST_HEAD(task_groups);
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CFS_BANDWIDTH
> +struct cfs_bandwidth {
> +	raw_spinlock_t		lock;
> +	ktime_t			period;
> +	u64			runtime, quota;
> +	struct hrtimer		period_timer;
> +};
> +#endif

If you write that as:

struct cfs_bandwidth {
#ifdef CONFIG_CFS_BANDWIDTH
	...
#endif
};

>  /* task group related information */
>  struct task_group {
>  	struct cgroup_subsys_state css;
> @@ -276,6 +288,10 @@ struct task_group {
>  #ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_AUTOGROUP
>  	struct autogroup *autogroup;
>  #endif
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CFS_BANDWIDTH
> +	struct cfs_bandwidth cfs_bandwidth;
> +#endif
>  };

You can avoid the #ifdef'ery here

>  /* task_group_lock serializes the addition/removal of task groups */
> @@ -370,9 +386,76 @@ struct cfs_rq {

> +#ifdef CONFIG_CFS_BANDWIDTH
> +static int do_sched_cfs_period_timer(struct cfs_bandwidth *cfs_b, int overrun);
> +
> +static enum hrtimer_restart sched_cfs_period_timer(struct hrtimer *timer)
> +{
> +	struct cfs_bandwidth *cfs_b =
> +		container_of(timer, struct cfs_bandwidth, period_timer);
> +	ktime_t now;
> +	int overrun;
> +	int idle = 0;
> +
> +	for (;;) {
> +		now = hrtimer_cb_get_time(timer);
> +		overrun = hrtimer_forward(timer, now, cfs_b->period);
> +
> +		if (!overrun)
> +			break;
> +
> +		idle = do_sched_cfs_period_timer(cfs_b, overrun);
> +	}
> +
> +	return idle ? HRTIMER_NORESTART : HRTIMER_RESTART;
> +}
> +
> +static
> +void init_cfs_bandwidth(struct cfs_bandwidth *cfs_b, u64 quota, u64 period)
> +{
> +	raw_spin_lock_init(&cfs_b->lock);
> +	cfs_b->quota = cfs_b->runtime = quota;
> +	cfs_b->period = ns_to_ktime(period);
> +
> +	hrtimer_init(&cfs_b->period_timer, CLOCK_MONOTONIC, HRTIMER_MODE_REL);
> +	cfs_b->period_timer.function = sched_cfs_period_timer;
> +}
> +
> +static
> +void init_cfs_rq_quota(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
> +{
> +	cfs_rq->quota_used = 0;
> +	if (cfs_rq->tg->cfs_bandwidth.quota == RUNTIME_INF)
> +		cfs_rq->quota_assigned = RUNTIME_INF;
> +	else
> +		cfs_rq->quota_assigned = 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void start_cfs_bandwidth(struct cfs_bandwidth *cfs_b)
> +{
> +	if (cfs_b->quota == RUNTIME_INF)
> +		return;
> +
> +	if (hrtimer_active(&cfs_b->period_timer))
> +		return;
> +
> +	raw_spin_lock(&cfs_b->lock);
> +	start_bandwidth_timer(&cfs_b->period_timer, cfs_b->period);
> +	raw_spin_unlock(&cfs_b->lock);
> +}
> +
> +static void destroy_cfs_bandwidth(struct cfs_bandwidth *cfs_b)
> +{
> +	hrtimer_cancel(&cfs_b->period_timer);
> +}
> +#endif

and #else

stubs
#endif

>  /* Real-Time classes' related field in a runqueue: */
>  struct rt_rq {
>  	struct rt_prio_array active;
> @@ -8038,6 +8121,9 @@ static void init_tg_cfs_entry(struct tas
>  	tg->cfs_rq[cpu] = cfs_rq;
>  	init_cfs_rq(cfs_rq, rq);
>  	cfs_rq->tg = tg;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CFS_BANDWIDTH
> +	init_cfs_rq_quota(cfs_rq);
> +#endif

also avoids #ifdef'ery here

>  	tg->se[cpu] = se;
>  	/* se could be NULL for root_task_group */
> @@ -8173,6 +8259,10 @@ void __init sched_init(void)
>  		 * We achieve this by letting root_task_group's tasks sit
>  		 * directly in rq->cfs (i.e root_task_group->se[] = NULL).
>  		 */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CFS_BANDWIDTH
> +		init_cfs_bandwidth(&root_task_group.cfs_bandwidth,
> +				RUNTIME_INF, sched_cfs_bandwidth_period);
> +#endif

and here

>  		init_tg_cfs_entry(&root_task_group, &rq->cfs, NULL, i, NULL);
>  #endif /* CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED */
>  
> @@ -8415,6 +8505,10 @@ static void free_fair_sched_group(struct
>  {
>  	int i;
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CFS_BANDWIDTH
> +	destroy_cfs_bandwidth(&tg->cfs_bandwidth);
> +#endif

and here

>  	for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
>  		if (tg->cfs_rq)
>  			kfree(tg->cfs_rq[i]);
> @@ -8442,7 +8536,10 @@ int alloc_fair_sched_group(struct task_g
>  		goto err;
>  
>  	tg->shares = NICE_0_LOAD;
> -
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CFS_BANDWIDTH
> +	init_cfs_bandwidth(&tg->cfs_bandwidth, RUNTIME_INF,
> +			sched_cfs_bandwidth_period);
> +#endif

and here

>  	for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
>  		rq = cpu_rq(i);
>  

> @@ -9107,6 +9204,116 @@ static u64 cpu_shares_read_u64(struct cg
>  
>  	return (u64) tg->shares;
>  }
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CFS_BANDWIDTH
> +static int tg_set_cfs_bandwidth(struct task_group *tg, u64 period, u64 quota)
> +{
> +	int i;
> +	static DEFINE_MUTEX(mutex);
> +
> +	if (tg == &root_task_group)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	if (!period)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Ensure we have at least one tick of bandwidth every period.  This is
> +	 * to prevent reaching a state of large arrears when throttled via
> +	 * entity_tick() resulting in prolonged exit starvation.
> +	 */
> +	if (NS_TO_JIFFIES(quota) < 1)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&mutex);
> +	raw_spin_lock_irq(&tg->cfs_bandwidth.lock);
> +	tg->cfs_bandwidth.period = ns_to_ktime(period);
> +	tg->cfs_bandwidth.runtime = tg->cfs_bandwidth.quota = quota;
> +	raw_spin_unlock_irq(&tg->cfs_bandwidth.lock);
> +
> +	for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
> +		struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = tg->cfs_rq[i];
> +		struct rq *rq = rq_of(cfs_rq);
> +
> +		raw_spin_lock_irq(&rq->lock);
> +		init_cfs_rq_quota(cfs_rq);
> +		raw_spin_unlock_irq(&rq->lock);

Any particular reason you didn't mirror rt_rq->rt_runtime_lock?

> +	}
> +	mutex_unlock(&mutex);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}


> Index: tip/kernel/sched_fair.c
> ===================================================================
> --- tip.orig/kernel/sched_fair.c
> +++ tip/kernel/sched_fair.c
> @@ -88,6 +88,15 @@ const_debug unsigned int sysctl_sched_mi
>   */
>  unsigned int __read_mostly sysctl_sched_shares_window = 10000000UL;
>  
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CFS_BANDWIDTH
> +/*
> + * default period for cfs group bandwidth.
> + * default: 0.5s, units: nanoseconds
> + */
> +static u64 sched_cfs_bandwidth_period = 500000000ULL;
> +#endif
> +
>  static const struct sched_class fair_sched_class;
>  
>  /**************************************************************
> @@ -397,6 +406,9 @@ static void __enqueue_entity(struct cfs_
>  
>  	rb_link_node(&se->run_node, parent, link);
>  	rb_insert_color(&se->run_node, &cfs_rq->tasks_timeline);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CFS_BANDWIDTH
> +	start_cfs_bandwidth(&cfs_rq->tg->cfs_bandwidth);
> +#endif
>  }

This really needs to life elsewhere, __*_entity() functions are for
rb-tree muck.
 
>  static void __dequeue_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se)



  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-02-23 13:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 71+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-02-16  3:18 [CFS Bandwidth Control v4 0/7] Introduction Paul Turner
2011-02-16  3:18 ` [CFS Bandwidth Control v4 1/7] sched: introduce primitives to account for CFS bandwidth tracking Paul Turner
2011-02-16 16:52   ` Balbir Singh
2011-02-17  2:54     ` Bharata B Rao
2011-02-23 13:32   ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2011-02-25  3:11     ` Paul Turner
2011-02-25 20:53     ` Paul Turner
2011-02-16  3:18 ` [CFS Bandwidth Control v4 2/7] sched: accumulate per-cfs_rq cpu usage Paul Turner
2011-02-16 17:45   ` Balbir Singh
2011-02-23 13:32   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-02-25  3:33     ` Paul Turner
2011-02-25 12:31       ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-02-16  3:18 ` [CFS Bandwidth Control v4 3/7] sched: throttle cfs_rq entities which exceed their local quota Paul Turner
2011-02-18  6:52   ` Balbir Singh
2011-02-23 13:32   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-02-24  5:21     ` Bharata B Rao
2011-02-24 11:05       ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-02-24 15:45         ` Bharata B Rao
2011-02-24 15:52           ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-02-24 16:39             ` Bharata B Rao
2011-02-24 17:20               ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-02-25  3:59                 ` Paul Turner
2011-02-25  3:41         ` Paul Turner
2011-02-25  3:10     ` Paul Turner
2011-02-25 13:58       ` Bharata B Rao
2011-02-25 20:51         ` Paul Turner
2011-02-28  3:50           ` Bharata B Rao
2011-02-28  6:38             ` Paul Turner
2011-02-28 13:48       ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-01  8:31         ` Paul Turner
2011-03-02  7:23   ` Bharata B Rao
2011-03-02  8:05     ` Paul Turner
2011-02-16  3:18 ` [CFS Bandwidth Control v4 4/7] sched: unthrottle cfs_rq(s) who ran out of quota at period refresh Paul Turner
2011-02-18  7:19   ` Balbir Singh
2011-02-18  8:10     ` Bharata B Rao
2011-02-23 12:23   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-02-23 13:32   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-02-24  7:04     ` Bharata B Rao
2011-02-24 11:14       ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-02-26  0:02     ` Paul Turner
2011-02-16  3:18 ` [CFS Bandwidth Control v4 5/7] sched: add exports tracking cfs bandwidth control statistics Paul Turner
2011-02-22  3:14   ` Balbir Singh
2011-02-22  4:13     ` Bharata B Rao
2011-02-22  4:40       ` Balbir Singh
2011-02-23  8:03         ` Paul Turner
2011-02-23 10:13           ` Balbir Singh
2011-02-23 13:32   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-02-25  3:26     ` Paul Turner
2011-02-25  8:54       ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-02-16  3:18 ` [CFS Bandwidth Control v4 6/7] sched: hierarchical task accounting for SCHED_OTHER Paul Turner
2011-02-22  3:17   ` Balbir Singh
2011-02-23  8:05     ` Paul Turner
2011-02-23  2:02   ` Hidetoshi Seto
2011-02-23  2:20     ` Paul Turner
2011-02-23  2:43     ` Balbir Singh
2011-02-23 13:32   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-02-25  3:25     ` Paul Turner
2011-02-25 12:17       ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-02-16  3:18 ` [CFS Bandwidth Control v4 7/7] sched: add documentation for bandwidth control Paul Turner
2011-02-21  2:47 ` [CFS Bandwidth Control v4 0/7] Introduction Xiao Guangrong
2011-02-22 10:28   ` Bharata B Rao
2011-02-23  7:42   ` Paul Turner
2011-02-23  7:51     ` Balbir Singh
2011-02-23  7:56       ` Paul Turner
2011-02-23  8:31         ` Bharata B Rao
     [not found] ` <20110224161111.7d83a884@jacob-laptop>
2011-02-25 10:03   ` Paul Turner
2011-02-25 13:06     ` jacob pan
2011-03-08  3:57       ` Balbir Singh
2011-03-08 18:18         ` Jacob Pan
2011-03-09 10:12       ` Paul Turner
2011-03-09 21:57         ` jacob pan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1298467934.2217.767.camel@twins \
    --to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=cfriesen@nortel.com \
    --cc=dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=ego@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=herbert@13thfloor.at \
    --cc=kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=ncrao@google.com \
    --cc=pjt@google.com \
    --cc=svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=vatsa@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=xemul@openvz.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox