From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Bharata B Rao <bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Dhaval Giani <dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@in.ibm.com>,
Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>,
Herbert Poetzl <herbert@13thfloor.at>,
Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>, Chris Friesen <cfriesen@nortel.com>,
Nikhil Rao <ncrao@google.com>
Subject: Re: [CFS Bandwidth Control v4 1/7] sched: introduce primitives to account for CFS bandwidth tracking
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 14:32:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1298467934.2217.767.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110216031840.878320737@google.com>
On Tue, 2011-02-15 at 19:18 -0800, Paul Turner wrote:
> @@ -245,6 +248,15 @@ struct cfs_rq;
>
> static LIST_HEAD(task_groups);
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CFS_BANDWIDTH
> +struct cfs_bandwidth {
> + raw_spinlock_t lock;
> + ktime_t period;
> + u64 runtime, quota;
> + struct hrtimer period_timer;
> +};
> +#endif
If you write that as:
struct cfs_bandwidth {
#ifdef CONFIG_CFS_BANDWIDTH
...
#endif
};
> /* task group related information */
> struct task_group {
> struct cgroup_subsys_state css;
> @@ -276,6 +288,10 @@ struct task_group {
> #ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_AUTOGROUP
> struct autogroup *autogroup;
> #endif
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CFS_BANDWIDTH
> + struct cfs_bandwidth cfs_bandwidth;
> +#endif
> };
You can avoid the #ifdef'ery here
> /* task_group_lock serializes the addition/removal of task groups */
> @@ -370,9 +386,76 @@ struct cfs_rq {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CFS_BANDWIDTH
> +static int do_sched_cfs_period_timer(struct cfs_bandwidth *cfs_b, int overrun);
> +
> +static enum hrtimer_restart sched_cfs_period_timer(struct hrtimer *timer)
> +{
> + struct cfs_bandwidth *cfs_b =
> + container_of(timer, struct cfs_bandwidth, period_timer);
> + ktime_t now;
> + int overrun;
> + int idle = 0;
> +
> + for (;;) {
> + now = hrtimer_cb_get_time(timer);
> + overrun = hrtimer_forward(timer, now, cfs_b->period);
> +
> + if (!overrun)
> + break;
> +
> + idle = do_sched_cfs_period_timer(cfs_b, overrun);
> + }
> +
> + return idle ? HRTIMER_NORESTART : HRTIMER_RESTART;
> +}
> +
> +static
> +void init_cfs_bandwidth(struct cfs_bandwidth *cfs_b, u64 quota, u64 period)
> +{
> + raw_spin_lock_init(&cfs_b->lock);
> + cfs_b->quota = cfs_b->runtime = quota;
> + cfs_b->period = ns_to_ktime(period);
> +
> + hrtimer_init(&cfs_b->period_timer, CLOCK_MONOTONIC, HRTIMER_MODE_REL);
> + cfs_b->period_timer.function = sched_cfs_period_timer;
> +}
> +
> +static
> +void init_cfs_rq_quota(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
> +{
> + cfs_rq->quota_used = 0;
> + if (cfs_rq->tg->cfs_bandwidth.quota == RUNTIME_INF)
> + cfs_rq->quota_assigned = RUNTIME_INF;
> + else
> + cfs_rq->quota_assigned = 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void start_cfs_bandwidth(struct cfs_bandwidth *cfs_b)
> +{
> + if (cfs_b->quota == RUNTIME_INF)
> + return;
> +
> + if (hrtimer_active(&cfs_b->period_timer))
> + return;
> +
> + raw_spin_lock(&cfs_b->lock);
> + start_bandwidth_timer(&cfs_b->period_timer, cfs_b->period);
> + raw_spin_unlock(&cfs_b->lock);
> +}
> +
> +static void destroy_cfs_bandwidth(struct cfs_bandwidth *cfs_b)
> +{
> + hrtimer_cancel(&cfs_b->period_timer);
> +}
> +#endif
and #else
stubs
#endif
> /* Real-Time classes' related field in a runqueue: */
> struct rt_rq {
> struct rt_prio_array active;
> @@ -8038,6 +8121,9 @@ static void init_tg_cfs_entry(struct tas
> tg->cfs_rq[cpu] = cfs_rq;
> init_cfs_rq(cfs_rq, rq);
> cfs_rq->tg = tg;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CFS_BANDWIDTH
> + init_cfs_rq_quota(cfs_rq);
> +#endif
also avoids #ifdef'ery here
> tg->se[cpu] = se;
> /* se could be NULL for root_task_group */
> @@ -8173,6 +8259,10 @@ void __init sched_init(void)
> * We achieve this by letting root_task_group's tasks sit
> * directly in rq->cfs (i.e root_task_group->se[] = NULL).
> */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CFS_BANDWIDTH
> + init_cfs_bandwidth(&root_task_group.cfs_bandwidth,
> + RUNTIME_INF, sched_cfs_bandwidth_period);
> +#endif
and here
> init_tg_cfs_entry(&root_task_group, &rq->cfs, NULL, i, NULL);
> #endif /* CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED */
>
> @@ -8415,6 +8505,10 @@ static void free_fair_sched_group(struct
> {
> int i;
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CFS_BANDWIDTH
> + destroy_cfs_bandwidth(&tg->cfs_bandwidth);
> +#endif
and here
> for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
> if (tg->cfs_rq)
> kfree(tg->cfs_rq[i]);
> @@ -8442,7 +8536,10 @@ int alloc_fair_sched_group(struct task_g
> goto err;
>
> tg->shares = NICE_0_LOAD;
> -
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CFS_BANDWIDTH
> + init_cfs_bandwidth(&tg->cfs_bandwidth, RUNTIME_INF,
> + sched_cfs_bandwidth_period);
> +#endif
and here
> for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
> rq = cpu_rq(i);
>
> @@ -9107,6 +9204,116 @@ static u64 cpu_shares_read_u64(struct cg
>
> return (u64) tg->shares;
> }
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CFS_BANDWIDTH
> +static int tg_set_cfs_bandwidth(struct task_group *tg, u64 period, u64 quota)
> +{
> + int i;
> + static DEFINE_MUTEX(mutex);
> +
> + if (tg == &root_task_group)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (!period)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + /*
> + * Ensure we have at least one tick of bandwidth every period. This is
> + * to prevent reaching a state of large arrears when throttled via
> + * entity_tick() resulting in prolonged exit starvation.
> + */
> + if (NS_TO_JIFFIES(quota) < 1)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&mutex);
> + raw_spin_lock_irq(&tg->cfs_bandwidth.lock);
> + tg->cfs_bandwidth.period = ns_to_ktime(period);
> + tg->cfs_bandwidth.runtime = tg->cfs_bandwidth.quota = quota;
> + raw_spin_unlock_irq(&tg->cfs_bandwidth.lock);
> +
> + for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
> + struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = tg->cfs_rq[i];
> + struct rq *rq = rq_of(cfs_rq);
> +
> + raw_spin_lock_irq(&rq->lock);
> + init_cfs_rq_quota(cfs_rq);
> + raw_spin_unlock_irq(&rq->lock);
Any particular reason you didn't mirror rt_rq->rt_runtime_lock?
> + }
> + mutex_unlock(&mutex);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> Index: tip/kernel/sched_fair.c
> ===================================================================
> --- tip.orig/kernel/sched_fair.c
> +++ tip/kernel/sched_fair.c
> @@ -88,6 +88,15 @@ const_debug unsigned int sysctl_sched_mi
> */
> unsigned int __read_mostly sysctl_sched_shares_window = 10000000UL;
>
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CFS_BANDWIDTH
> +/*
> + * default period for cfs group bandwidth.
> + * default: 0.5s, units: nanoseconds
> + */
> +static u64 sched_cfs_bandwidth_period = 500000000ULL;
> +#endif
> +
> static const struct sched_class fair_sched_class;
>
> /**************************************************************
> @@ -397,6 +406,9 @@ static void __enqueue_entity(struct cfs_
>
> rb_link_node(&se->run_node, parent, link);
> rb_insert_color(&se->run_node, &cfs_rq->tasks_timeline);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CFS_BANDWIDTH
> + start_cfs_bandwidth(&cfs_rq->tg->cfs_bandwidth);
> +#endif
> }
This really needs to life elsewhere, __*_entity() functions are for
rb-tree muck.
> static void __dequeue_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-23 13:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 71+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-16 3:18 [CFS Bandwidth Control v4 0/7] Introduction Paul Turner
2011-02-16 3:18 ` [CFS Bandwidth Control v4 1/7] sched: introduce primitives to account for CFS bandwidth tracking Paul Turner
2011-02-16 16:52 ` Balbir Singh
2011-02-17 2:54 ` Bharata B Rao
2011-02-23 13:32 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2011-02-25 3:11 ` Paul Turner
2011-02-25 20:53 ` Paul Turner
2011-02-16 3:18 ` [CFS Bandwidth Control v4 2/7] sched: accumulate per-cfs_rq cpu usage Paul Turner
2011-02-16 17:45 ` Balbir Singh
2011-02-23 13:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-02-25 3:33 ` Paul Turner
2011-02-25 12:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-02-16 3:18 ` [CFS Bandwidth Control v4 3/7] sched: throttle cfs_rq entities which exceed their local quota Paul Turner
2011-02-18 6:52 ` Balbir Singh
2011-02-23 13:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-02-24 5:21 ` Bharata B Rao
2011-02-24 11:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-02-24 15:45 ` Bharata B Rao
2011-02-24 15:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-02-24 16:39 ` Bharata B Rao
2011-02-24 17:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-02-25 3:59 ` Paul Turner
2011-02-25 3:41 ` Paul Turner
2011-02-25 3:10 ` Paul Turner
2011-02-25 13:58 ` Bharata B Rao
2011-02-25 20:51 ` Paul Turner
2011-02-28 3:50 ` Bharata B Rao
2011-02-28 6:38 ` Paul Turner
2011-02-28 13:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-01 8:31 ` Paul Turner
2011-03-02 7:23 ` Bharata B Rao
2011-03-02 8:05 ` Paul Turner
2011-02-16 3:18 ` [CFS Bandwidth Control v4 4/7] sched: unthrottle cfs_rq(s) who ran out of quota at period refresh Paul Turner
2011-02-18 7:19 ` Balbir Singh
2011-02-18 8:10 ` Bharata B Rao
2011-02-23 12:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-02-23 13:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-02-24 7:04 ` Bharata B Rao
2011-02-24 11:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-02-26 0:02 ` Paul Turner
2011-02-16 3:18 ` [CFS Bandwidth Control v4 5/7] sched: add exports tracking cfs bandwidth control statistics Paul Turner
2011-02-22 3:14 ` Balbir Singh
2011-02-22 4:13 ` Bharata B Rao
2011-02-22 4:40 ` Balbir Singh
2011-02-23 8:03 ` Paul Turner
2011-02-23 10:13 ` Balbir Singh
2011-02-23 13:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-02-25 3:26 ` Paul Turner
2011-02-25 8:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-02-16 3:18 ` [CFS Bandwidth Control v4 6/7] sched: hierarchical task accounting for SCHED_OTHER Paul Turner
2011-02-22 3:17 ` Balbir Singh
2011-02-23 8:05 ` Paul Turner
2011-02-23 2:02 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2011-02-23 2:20 ` Paul Turner
2011-02-23 2:43 ` Balbir Singh
2011-02-23 13:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-02-25 3:25 ` Paul Turner
2011-02-25 12:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-02-16 3:18 ` [CFS Bandwidth Control v4 7/7] sched: add documentation for bandwidth control Paul Turner
2011-02-21 2:47 ` [CFS Bandwidth Control v4 0/7] Introduction Xiao Guangrong
2011-02-22 10:28 ` Bharata B Rao
2011-02-23 7:42 ` Paul Turner
2011-02-23 7:51 ` Balbir Singh
2011-02-23 7:56 ` Paul Turner
2011-02-23 8:31 ` Bharata B Rao
[not found] ` <20110224161111.7d83a884@jacob-laptop>
2011-02-25 10:03 ` Paul Turner
2011-02-25 13:06 ` jacob pan
2011-03-08 3:57 ` Balbir Singh
2011-03-08 18:18 ` Jacob Pan
2011-03-09 10:12 ` Paul Turner
2011-03-09 21:57 ` jacob pan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1298467934.2217.767.camel@twins \
--to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=cfriesen@nortel.com \
--cc=dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=ego@in.ibm.com \
--cc=herbert@13thfloor.at \
--cc=kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=ncrao@google.com \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
--cc=svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=vatsa@in.ibm.com \
--cc=xemul@openvz.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox