From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752738Ab1CEOPP (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Mar 2011 09:15:15 -0500 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:62055 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751201Ab1CEOPO (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Mar 2011 09:15:14 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.62,269,1297065600"; d="scan'208";a="609413209" Subject: Re: [RFC -tip] perf, x86: P4 PMU -- Address erratum 15 and 17 From: Lin Ming To: Cyrill Gorcunov Cc: Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Robert Richter , lkml In-Reply-To: <4D7141FC.8000504@gmail.com> References: <4D7141FC.8000504@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2011 22:14:47 +0800 Message-Id: <1299334487.2324.1.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.0 (2.28.0-2.fc12) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 2011-03-05 at 03:48 +0800, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: > Errata N15 and 17 of 249199-071 should be taken > into account. They are mostly hard to hit at moment > i believe but still better to be fixed. > > Signed-off-by: Cyrill Gorcunov > --- > > Ming, mind to give it a shot? I seems will be able to test myself > at Wednesday only. And I would like to get a review first to eliminate > some silly mistakes ;) I'll test this next Monday when I back to office. Thanks. > > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_p4.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)