From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: oleg@redhat.com, roland@redhat.com, jan.kratochvil@redhat.com,
vda.linux@googlemail.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, indan@nul.nu,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 8/8] job control: Don't send duplicate job control stop notification while ptraced
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 20:56:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1299614199-25142-9-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1299614199-25142-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
Just as group_exit_code shouldn't be generated when a PTRACE_CONT'd
task re-enters job control stop, notifiction for the event should be
suppressed too. The logic is the same as the group_exit_code
generation suppression in do_signal_stop(), if SIGNAL_STOP_STOPPED is
already set, the task is re-entering job control stop without
intervening SIGCONT and the notifications should be suppressed.
Test case follows.
#include <stdio.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <signal.h>
#include <time.h>
#include <sys/ptrace.h>
#include <sys/wait.h>
static const struct timespec ts100ms = { .tv_nsec = 100000000 };
static pid_t tracee, tracer;
static const char *pid_who(pid_t pid)
{
return pid == tracee ? "tracee" : (pid == tracer ? "tracer" : "mommy ");
}
static void sigchld_sigaction(int signo, siginfo_t *si, void *ucxt)
{
printf("%s: SIG status=%02d code=%02d (%s)\n",
pid_who(getpid()), si->si_status, si->si_code,
pid_who(si->si_pid));
}
int main(void)
{
const struct sigaction chld_sa = { .sa_sigaction = sigchld_sigaction,
.sa_flags = SA_SIGINFO|SA_RESTART };
siginfo_t si;
sigaction(SIGCHLD, &chld_sa, NULL);
tracee = fork();
if (!tracee) {
tracee = getpid();
while (1)
pause();
}
kill(tracee, SIGSTOP);
waitid(P_PID, tracee, &si, WSTOPPED);
tracer = fork();
if (!tracer) {
tracer = getpid();
ptrace(PTRACE_ATTACH, tracee, NULL, NULL);
waitid(P_PID, tracee, &si, WSTOPPED);
ptrace(PTRACE_CONT, tracee, NULL, (void *)(long)si.si_status);
waitid(P_PID, tracee, &si, WSTOPPED);
ptrace(PTRACE_CONT, tracee, NULL, (void *)(long)si.si_status);
waitid(P_PID, tracee, &si, WSTOPPED);
printf("tracer: detaching\n");
ptrace(PTRACE_DETACH, tracee, NULL, NULL);
return 0;
}
while (1)
pause();
return 0;
}
Before the patch, the parent gets the second notification for the
tracee after the tracer detaches. si_status is zero because
group_exit_code is not set by the group stop completion which
triggered this notification.
mommy : SIG status=19 code=05 (tracee)
tracer: SIG status=00 code=05 (tracee)
tracer: SIG status=19 code=04 (tracee)
tracer: SIG status=00 code=05 (tracee)
tracer: detaching
mommy : SIG status=00 code=05 (tracee)
mommy : SIG status=00 code=01 (tracer)
^C
After the patch, the duplicate notification is gone.
mommy : SIG status=19 code=05 (tracee)
tracer: SIG status=00 code=05 (tracee)
tracer: SIG status=19 code=04 (tracee)
tracer: SIG status=00 code=05 (tracee)
tracer: detaching
mommy : SIG status=00 code=01 (tracer)
^C
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
---
kernel/signal.c | 10 +++++++++-
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/signal.c b/kernel/signal.c
index 74f097c..8304563 100644
--- a/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/kernel/signal.c
@@ -268,6 +268,10 @@ void task_clear_group_stop_pending(struct task_struct *task)
*
* CONTEXT:
* Must be called with @task->sighand->siglock held.
+ *
+ * RETURNS:
+ * %true if group stop completion should be notified to the parent, %false
+ * otherwise.
*/
static bool task_participate_group_stop(struct task_struct *task)
{
@@ -284,7 +288,11 @@ static bool task_participate_group_stop(struct task_struct *task)
if (!WARN_ON_ONCE(sig->group_stop_count == 0))
sig->group_stop_count--;
- if (!sig->group_stop_count) {
+ /*
+ * Tell the caller to notify completion iff we are entering into a
+ * fresh group stop. Read comment in do_signal_stop() for details.
+ */
+ if (!sig->group_stop_count && !(sig->flags & SIGNAL_STOP_STOPPED)) {
sig->flags = SIGNAL_STOP_STOPPED;
return true;
}
--
1.7.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-08 19:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-08 19:56 [RFC PATCHSET] ptrace,signal: Fix notifications to the real parent while ptraced Tejun Heo
2011-03-08 19:56 ` [PATCH 1/8] job control: Don't set group_stop exit_code if re-entering job control stop Tejun Heo
2011-03-21 13:20 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-03-21 15:52 ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-22 18:44 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-03-23 8:44 ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-23 16:40 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-03-23 17:02 ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-23 17:09 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-03-23 17:22 ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-08 19:56 ` [PATCH 2/8] job control: Small reorganization of wait_consider_task() Tejun Heo
2011-03-08 19:56 ` [PATCH 3/8] job control: Fix ptracer wait(2) hang and explain notask_error clearing Tejun Heo
2011-03-21 15:19 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-03-21 16:09 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-03-21 16:12 ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-22 19:08 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-03-22 10:51 ` [PATCH UPDATED " Tejun Heo
2011-03-08 19:56 ` [PATCH 4/8] job control: Allow access to job control events through ptracees Tejun Heo
2011-03-21 16:39 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-03-21 17:20 ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-22 11:10 ` [PATCH UPDATED " Tejun Heo
2011-03-08 19:56 ` [PATCH 5/8] job control: Add @for_ptrace to do_notify_parent_cldstop() Tejun Heo
2011-03-08 19:56 ` [PATCH 6/8] job control: Job control stop notifications should always go to the real parent Tejun Heo
2011-03-21 17:12 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-03-08 19:56 ` [PATCH 7/8] job control: Notify the real parent of job control events regardless of ptrace Tejun Heo
2011-03-21 17:43 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-03-22 8:04 ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-22 19:44 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-03-23 9:17 ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-23 9:24 ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-23 16:46 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-03-23 16:59 ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-23 17:07 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-03-23 17:20 ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-23 17:17 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-03-22 11:30 ` [PATCH UPDATED " Tejun Heo
2011-03-08 19:56 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2011-03-21 17:48 ` [PATCH 8/8] job control: Don't send duplicate job control stop notification while ptraced Oleg Nesterov
2011-03-08 20:01 ` [RFC PATCHSET] ptrace,signal: Fix notifications to the real parent " Linus Torvalds
2011-03-09 16:50 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-03-22 10:20 ` [PATCH 0.1/8] ptrace: Collapse ptrace_untrace() into __ptrace_unlink() Tejun Heo
2011-03-22 10:20 ` [PATCH 0.2/8] ptrace: Always put ptracee into appropriate execution state Tejun Heo
2011-03-22 20:33 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-03-23 8:00 ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-22 13:11 ` [RFC PATCHSET] ptrace,signal: Fix notifications to the real parent while ptraced Tejun Heo
2011-03-22 20:59 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-03-23 8:48 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1299614199-25142-9-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=indan@nul.nu \
--cc=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=roland@redhat.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vda.linux@googlemail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox