From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752620Ab1CJGyT (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Mar 2011 01:54:19 -0500 Received: from gate.crashing.org ([63.228.1.57]:41768 "EHLO gate.crashing.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752242Ab1CJGyS (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Mar 2011 01:54:18 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH/v2] mm/memblock: Properly handle overlaps and fix error path From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Yinghai Lu , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , "H. Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , Russell King , David Miller , Tejun Heo , Andrew Morton In-Reply-To: <20110310064614.GE9289@elte.hu> References: <1299466980.8833.973.camel@pasglop> <4D77E5E0.6010706@kernel.org> <1299705610.22236.390.camel@pasglop> <20110310064614.GE9289@elte.hu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 17:53:38 +1100 Message-ID: <1299740018.22236.469.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2011-03-10 at 07:46 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > Ah interesting, so you did have a case of overlap that wasn't properly > > handled as well. > > > > If there is no objection, I'll queue that up in powerpc-next for the > > upcoming merge window (soon now). > > I think it would be better to do it via -mm, as x86 and other architectures are now > affected by memblock changes as well. No objection, Andrew, are you picking this up ? Cheers, Ben.