From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>
Cc: linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
Ed Nadolski <edmund.nadolski@intel.com>,
Ed Ciechanowski <ed.ciechanowski@intel.com>,
Jacek Danecki <jacek.danecki@intel.com>,
Jeff Skirvin <jeffrey.d.skirvin@intel.com>
Subject: isci for 2.6.39?
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 16:02:37 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1299801757.8641.21.camel@dwillia2-linux> (raw)
James,
Given the impending opening of the 2.6.39 merge window I would like to
discuss the options for merging the isci driver. Review has been
intermittent which is understandable given the size and flux of the
codebase. It has received a good amount of cleanups, but additional
review issues and cleanups are still all too easy to spot. I know you
have expressed reservations about taking scsi drivers through -staging
in the past [1], so I would like to propose an alternative. Merge the
driver into scsi-misc but with a -staging style TODO file that tracks
the review issues. If the TODO file is not addressed by the 2.6.40
window the driver would be moved to -staging. This has the benefit of
keeping the driver under your purview and expected location, but still
have the imminent prospect of being de-staged to ensure the community's
concerns are ultimately addressed. We fully intend to maintain the
current momentum on the driver cleanup effort and be ready in advance of
2.6.40.
As a side note I'm still looking for a disposition for:
"libsas: flush initial device discovery before completing ->scan_finished()" [2]
"libsas: fix/amend device gone notification in sas_deform_port()" [3]
Both have since been: Acked-by: Jack Wang <jack_wang@usish.com>
Thanks,
Dan for the isci driver team
[1]: http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=125536150519905&w=2
[2]: http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=129791077719331&w=2
[3]: http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=129791105419577&w=2
next reply other threads:[~2011-03-11 0:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-11 0:02 Dan Williams [this message]
2011-03-11 0:10 ` isci for 2.6.39? James Bottomley
2011-03-11 0:40 ` Dan Williams
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1299801757.8641.21.camel@dwillia2-linux \
--to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@suse.de \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=ed.ciechanowski@intel.com \
--cc=edmund.nadolski@intel.com \
--cc=jacek.danecki@intel.com \
--cc=jeffrey.d.skirvin@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox