Re: [PATCH RESEND v5 -tip] x86, dumpstack: Correct stack dump info when frame pointer is available

[Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>]

On Fri, 2011-03-18 at 11:40 +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> 
> Current stack dump code scans entire stack and check each entry
> contains a pointer to kernel code. If CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER=y it
> could mark whether the pointer is valid or not based on value of
> the frame pointer. Invalid entries could be preceded by '?' sign.
> 
> However this was not going to happen because scan start point was
> always higher than the frame pointer so that they could not meet.
> 
> Commit 9c0729dc8062 ("x86: Eliminate bp argument from the stack
> tracing routines") delayed bp acquisition point, so the bp was
> read in lower frame, thus all of the entries were marked invalid.
> 
> This patch fixes this by reverting above commit while retaining
> stack_frame() helper as suggested by Frederic Weisbecker.
> End result looks like below:
> 
> before:
> [    3.508329] Call Trace:
> [    3.508551]  [<ffffffff814f35c9>] ? panic+0x91/0x199
> [    3.508662]  [<ffffffff814f3739>] ? printk+0x68/0x6a
> [    3.508770]  [<ffffffff81a981b2>] ? mount_block_root+0x257/0x26e
> [    3.508876]  [<ffffffff81a9821f>] ? mount_root+0x56/0x5a
> [    3.508975]  [<ffffffff81a98393>] ? prepare_namespace+0x170/0x1a9
> [    3.509216]  [<ffffffff81a9772b>] ? kernel_init+0x1d2/0x1e2
> [    3.509335]  [<ffffffff81003894>] ? kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
> [    3.509442]  [<ffffffff814f6880>] ? restore_args+0x0/0x30
> [    3.509542]  [<ffffffff81a97559>] ? kernel_init+0x0/0x1e2
> [    3.509641]  [<ffffffff81003890>] ? kernel_thread_helper+0x0/0x10
> 
> after:
> [    3.522991] Call Trace:
> [    3.523351]  [<ffffffff814f35b9>] panic+0x91/0x199
> [    3.523468]  [<ffffffff814f3729>] ? printk+0x68/0x6a
> [    3.523576]  [<ffffffff81a981b2>] mount_block_root+0x257/0x26e
> [    3.523681]  [<ffffffff81a9821f>] mount_root+0x56/0x5a
> [    3.523780]  [<ffffffff81a98393>] prepare_namespace+0x170/0x1a9
> [    3.523885]  [<ffffffff81a9772b>] kernel_init+0x1d2/0x1e2
> [    3.523987]  [<ffffffff81003894>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
> [    3.524228]  [<ffffffff814f6880>] ? restore_args+0x0/0x30
> [    3.524345]  [<ffffffff81a97559>] ? kernel_init+0x0/0x1e2
> [    3.524445]  [<ffffffff81003890>] ? kernel_thread_helper+0x0/0x10
> 
> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
> Cc: Soren Sandmann <ssp@redhat.com>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
> Cc: Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com> 

Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>

Ingo, _please_, pretty _please_ merge this? These wrecked unwinds drive
me up the wall ;-)