From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/8] fs: Lock the inode LRU list separately
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 22:23:38 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1300793023-3775-4-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1300793023-3775-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com>
From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Introduce the inode_lru_lock to protect the inode_lru list. This
lock is nested inside the inode->i_lock to allow the inode to be
added to the LRU list in iput_final without needing to deal with
lock inversions. This keeps iput_final() clean and neat.
Further, where marking the inode I_FREEING and removing it from the
LRU, move the LRU list manipulation within the inode->i_lock to keep
the list manipulation consistent with iput_final. This also means
that most of the open coded LRU list removal + unused inode
accounting can now use the inode_lru_list_del() wrappers which
cleans the code up further.
However, this locking change means what the LRU traversal in
prune_icache() inverts this lock ordering and needs to use trylock
semantics on the inode->i_lock to avoid deadlocking. In these cases,
if we fail to lock the inode we move it to the back of the LRU to
prevent spinning on it.
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
---
fs/inode.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
1 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/inode.c b/fs/inode.c
index 442b55b..f6e6e37 100644
--- a/fs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/inode.c
@@ -31,10 +31,13 @@
*
* inode->i_lock protects:
* inode->i_state, inode->i_hash, __iget()
+ * inode_lru_lock protects:
+ * inode_lru, inode->i_lru
*
* Lock ordering:
* inode_lock
* inode->i_lock
+ * inode_lru_lock
*/
/*
@@ -84,6 +87,7 @@ static unsigned int i_hash_shift __read_mostly;
*/
static LIST_HEAD(inode_lru);
+static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(inode_lru_lock);
static struct hlist_head *inode_hashtable __read_mostly;
/*
@@ -355,18 +359,22 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(ihold);
static void inode_lru_list_add(struct inode *inode)
{
+ spin_lock(&inode_lru_lock);
if (list_empty(&inode->i_lru)) {
list_add(&inode->i_lru, &inode_lru);
inodes_stat.nr_unused++;
}
+ spin_unlock(&inode_lru_lock);
}
static void inode_lru_list_del(struct inode *inode)
{
+ spin_lock(&inode_lru_lock);
if (!list_empty(&inode->i_lru)) {
list_del_init(&inode->i_lru);
inodes_stat.nr_unused--;
}
+ spin_unlock(&inode_lru_lock);
}
static inline void __inode_sb_list_add(struct inode *inode)
@@ -542,10 +550,9 @@ void evict_inodes(struct super_block *sb)
}
inode->i_state |= I_FREEING;
- if (!(inode->i_state & (I_DIRTY | I_SYNC)))
- inodes_stat.nr_unused--;
+ inode_lru_list_del(inode);
spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
- list_move(&inode->i_lru, &dispose);
+ list_add(&inode->i_lru, &dispose);
}
spin_unlock(&inode_lock);
@@ -595,10 +602,9 @@ int invalidate_inodes(struct super_block *sb, bool kill_dirty)
}
inode->i_state |= I_FREEING;
- if (!(inode->i_state & (I_DIRTY | I_SYNC)))
- inodes_stat.nr_unused--;
+ inode_lru_list_del(inode);
spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
- list_move(&inode->i_lru, &dispose);
+ list_add(&inode->i_lru, &dispose);
}
spin_unlock(&inode_lock);
@@ -622,7 +628,7 @@ static int can_unuse(struct inode *inode)
/*
* Scan `goal' inodes on the unused list for freeable ones. They are moved to a
- * temporary list and then are freed outside inode_lock by dispose_list().
+ * temporary list and then are freed outside inode_lru_lock by dispose_list().
*
* Any inodes which are pinned purely because of attached pagecache have their
* pagecache removed. If the inode has metadata buffers attached to
@@ -644,6 +650,7 @@ static void prune_icache(int nr_to_scan)
down_read(&iprune_sem);
spin_lock(&inode_lock);
+ spin_lock(&inode_lru_lock);
for (nr_scanned = 0; nr_scanned < nr_to_scan; nr_scanned++) {
struct inode *inode;
@@ -653,10 +660,19 @@ static void prune_icache(int nr_to_scan)
inode = list_entry(inode_lru.prev, struct inode, i_lru);
/*
+ * we are inverting the inode_lru_lock/inode->i_lock here,
+ * so use a trylock. If we fail to get the lock, just move the
+ * inode to the back of the list so we don't spin on it.
+ */
+ if (!spin_trylock(&inode->i_lock)) {
+ list_move(&inode->i_lru, &inode_lru);
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ /*
* Referenced or dirty inodes are still in use. Give them
* another pass through the LRU as we canot reclaim them now.
*/
- spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
if (atomic_read(&inode->i_count) ||
(inode->i_state & ~I_REFERENCED)) {
spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
@@ -675,17 +691,21 @@ static void prune_icache(int nr_to_scan)
if (inode_has_buffers(inode) || inode->i_data.nrpages) {
__iget(inode);
spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
+ spin_unlock(&inode_lru_lock);
spin_unlock(&inode_lock);
if (remove_inode_buffers(inode))
reap += invalidate_mapping_pages(&inode->i_data,
0, -1);
iput(inode);
spin_lock(&inode_lock);
+ spin_lock(&inode_lru_lock);
if (inode != list_entry(inode_lru.next,
struct inode, i_lru))
continue; /* wrong inode or list_empty */
- spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
+ /* avoid lock inversions with trylock */
+ if (!spin_trylock(&inode->i_lock))
+ continue;
if (!can_unuse(inode)) {
spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
continue;
@@ -702,6 +722,7 @@ static void prune_icache(int nr_to_scan)
__count_vm_events(KSWAPD_INODESTEAL, reap);
else
__count_vm_events(PGINODESTEAL, reap);
+ spin_unlock(&inode_lru_lock);
spin_unlock(&inode_lock);
dispose_list(&freeable);
--
1.7.2.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-22 11:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-22 11:23 vfs: inode lock breakup Dave Chinner
2011-03-22 11:23 ` [PATCH 1/8] fs: protect inode->i_state with inode->i_lock Dave Chinner
2011-03-22 11:23 ` [PATCH 2/8] fs: factor inode disposal Dave Chinner
2011-03-22 11:23 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2011-03-22 11:23 ` [PATCH 4/8] fs: remove inode_lock from iput_final and prune_icache Dave Chinner
2011-03-22 11:23 ` [PATCH 5/8] fs: move i_sb_list out from under inode_lock Dave Chinner
2011-03-22 11:23 ` [PATCH 6/8] fs: move i_wb_list " Dave Chinner
2011-03-22 11:23 ` [PATCH 7/8] fs: rename inode_lock to inode_hash_lock Dave Chinner
2011-03-22 11:23 ` [PATCH 8/8] fs: pull inode->i_lock up out of writeback_single_inode Dave Chinner
2011-03-22 18:17 ` vfs: inode lock breakup Sedat Dilek
2011-03-23 6:29 ` Dave Chinner
2011-03-23 7:53 ` Sedat Dilek
2011-03-23 23:36 ` Dave Chinner
2011-03-23 19:03 ` [PATCH 9/8] fs: simplify iget & friends Christoph Hellwig
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-10-29 8:59 fs: break out inode operations from inode_lock V4 Dave Chinner
2010-10-29 8:59 ` [PATCH 3/8] fs: Lock the inode LRU list separately Dave Chinner
2010-10-29 3:23 fs: break out inode operations from inode_lock V3 Dave Chinner
2010-10-29 3:23 ` [PATCH 3/8] fs: Lock the inode LRU list separately Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1300793023-3775-4-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox