From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: oleg@redhat.com, jan.kratochvil@redhat.com, vda.linux@googlemail.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, indan@nul.nu, roland@hack.frob.com,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 13/20] job control: Don't set group_stop exit_code if re-entering job control stop
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 11:05:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1300874766-12941-14-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1300874766-12941-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
While ptraced, a task may be resumed while the containing process is
still job control stopped. If the task receives another stop signal
in this state, it will still initiate group stop, which generates
group_exit_code, which the real parent would be able to see once the
ptracer detaches.
In this scenario, the real parent may see two consecutive CLD_STOPPED
events from two stop signals without intervening SIGCONT, which
normally is impossible.
Test case follows.
#include <stdio.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <sys/ptrace.h>
#include <sys/wait.h>
int main(void)
{
pid_t tracee;
siginfo_t si;
tracee = fork();
if (!tracee)
while (1)
pause();
kill(tracee, SIGSTOP);
waitid(P_PID, tracee, &si, WSTOPPED);
if (!fork()) {
ptrace(PTRACE_ATTACH, tracee, NULL, NULL);
waitid(P_PID, tracee, &si, WSTOPPED);
ptrace(PTRACE_CONT, tracee, NULL, (void *)(long)si.si_status);
waitid(P_PID, tracee, &si, WSTOPPED);
ptrace(PTRACE_CONT, tracee, NULL, (void *)(long)si.si_status);
waitid(P_PID, tracee, &si, WSTOPPED);
ptrace(PTRACE_DETACH, tracee, NULL, NULL);
return 0;
}
while (1) {
si.si_pid = 0;
waitid(P_PID, tracee, &si, WSTOPPED | WNOHANG);
if (si.si_pid)
printf("st=%02d c=%02d\n", si.si_status, si.si_code);
}
return 0;
}
Before the patch, the latter waitid() in polling mode reports the
second stopped event generated by the implied SIGSTOP of
PTRACE_ATTACH.
st=19 c=05
^C
After the patch, the second event is not reported.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
---
kernel/signal.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++---
1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/signal.c b/kernel/signal.c
index 1e19991..2f2c8f6 100644
--- a/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/kernel/signal.c
@@ -1827,10 +1827,27 @@ static int do_signal_stop(int signr)
unlikely(signal_group_exit(sig)))
return 0;
/*
- * There is no group stop already in progress.
- * We must initiate one now.
+ * There is no group stop already in progress. We must
+ * initiate one now.
+ *
+ * While ptraced, a task may be resumed while group stop is
+ * still in effect and then receive a stop signal and
+ * initiate another group stop. This deviates from the
+ * usual behavior as two consecutive stop signals can't
+ * cause two group stops when !ptraced.
+ *
+ * The condition can be distinguished by testing whether
+ * SIGNAL_STOP_STOPPED is already set. Don't generate
+ * group_exit_code in such case.
+ *
+ * This is not necessary for SIGNAL_STOP_CONTINUED because
+ * an intervening stop signal is required to cause two
+ * continued events regardless of ptrace.
*/
- sig->group_exit_code = signr;
+ if (!(sig->flags & SIGNAL_STOP_STOPPED))
+ sig->group_exit_code = signr;
+ else
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(!task_ptrace(current));
current->group_stop &= ~GROUP_STOP_SIGMASK;
current->group_stop |= signr | gstop;
--
1.7.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-23 10:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-23 10:05 [PATCHSET] ptrace,signal: Improve ptrace and job control interaction Tejun Heo
2011-03-23 10:05 ` [PATCH 01/20] signal: Fix SIGCONT notification code Tejun Heo
2011-03-23 10:05 ` [PATCH 02/20] ptrace: Remove the extra wake_up_state() from ptrace_detach() Tejun Heo
2011-03-23 10:05 ` [PATCH 03/20] signal: Remove superflous try_to_freeze() loop in do_signal_stop() Tejun Heo
2011-03-23 10:05 ` [PATCH 04/20] ptrace: Kill tracehook_notify_jctl() Tejun Heo
2011-03-23 10:05 ` [PATCH 05/20] ptrace: Add @why to ptrace_stop() Tejun Heo
2011-03-23 10:05 ` [PATCH 06/20] signal: Fix premature completion of group stop when interfered by ptrace Tejun Heo
2011-03-23 10:05 ` [PATCH 07/20] signal: Use GROUP_STOP_PENDING to stop once for a single group stop Tejun Heo
2011-03-23 10:05 ` [PATCH 08/20] ptrace: Participate in group stop from ptrace_stop() iff the task is trapping for " Tejun Heo
2011-03-23 10:05 ` [PATCH 09/20] ptrace: Make do_signal_stop() use ptrace_stop() if the task is being ptraced Tejun Heo
2011-03-23 10:05 ` [PATCH 10/20] ptrace: Clean transitions between TASK_STOPPED and TRACED Tejun Heo
2011-03-23 10:05 ` [PATCH 11/20] ptrace: Collapse ptrace_untrace() into __ptrace_unlink() Tejun Heo
2011-03-23 10:05 ` [PATCH 12/20] ptrace: Always put ptracee into appropriate execution state Tejun Heo
2011-03-23 10:05 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2011-03-23 10:06 ` [PATCH 14/20] job control: Small reorganization of wait_consider_task() Tejun Heo
2011-03-23 10:06 ` [PATCH 15/20] job control: Fix ptracer wait(2) hang and explain notask_error clearing Tejun Heo
2011-03-23 10:06 ` [PATCH 16/20] job control: Allow access to job control events through ptracees Tejun Heo
2011-03-23 10:06 ` [PATCH 17/20] job control: Add @for_ptrace to do_notify_parent_cldstop() Tejun Heo
2011-03-23 10:06 ` [PATCH 18/20] job control: Job control stop notifications should always go to the real parent Tejun Heo
2011-03-23 10:06 ` [PATCH 19/20] job control: Notify the real parent of job control events regardless of ptrace Tejun Heo
2011-03-23 10:06 ` [PATCH 20/20] job control: Don't send duplicate job control stop notification while ptraced Tejun Heo
2011-03-23 18:38 ` [PATCHSET] ptrace,signal: Improve ptrace and job control interaction Oleg Nesterov
2011-03-25 14:26 ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-26 18:25 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-03-28 8:58 ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-28 12:14 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-03-28 15:21 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1300874766-12941-14-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=indan@nul.nu \
--cc=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=roland@hack.frob.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vda.linux@googlemail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).