From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
tglx@linutronix.de
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/cleanups] x86, dumpstack: Use frame pointer during stack trace
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 22:08:54 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1300885734.1479.6.camel@leonhard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110310230222.GB1837@nowhere>
2011-03-11 (금), 00:02 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker:
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 10:26:07PM +0000, tip-bot for Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > Commit-ID: 2f8058ae197236f9d5641850ce27f67d8f3e0b39
> > Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/2f8058ae197236f9d5641850ce27f67d8f3e0b39
> > Author: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
> > AuthorDate: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 20:44:22 +0900
> > Committer: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> > CommitDate: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 23:20:30 +0100
> >
> > x86, dumpstack: Use frame pointer during stack trace
> >
> > If CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER is set then use the frame pointer for the
> > stack backtrace rather than scanning whole stack blindly.
>
> We don't do it blindly, we actually check the reliability with the
> frame pointer.
>
> I'm not sure this patch is a good idea. stack dumps need to stay very
> robust and not exclusively rely on the frame pointer to be correct.
> At least walking blindly the stack provides a best effort dump as a last
> resort.
>
Sounds reasonable. How about adding a boot param to control it then?
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c
index 809d027de28f..0d7efd90c588 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c
@@ -177,6 +177,16 @@ static const struct stacktrace_ops print_trace_ops
#endif
};
+static int __init nofptrace_setup(char *s)
+{
+ struct stacktrace_ops *ops;
+
+ ops = (struct stacktrace_ops *) &print_trace_ops;
+ ops->walk_stack = walk_context_stack;
+ return 0;
+}
+early_param("nofptrace", nofptrace_setup);
+
void
show_trace_log_lvl(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs,
unsigned long *stack, unsigned long bp, char *log_lvl)
--
Regards,
Namhyung Kim
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-23 13:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-08 11:44 [PATCH v4 -tip 1/4] x86, dumpstack: Correct stack dump info when frame pointer is available Namhyung Kim
2011-03-08 11:44 ` [PATCH v4 -tip 2/4] x86, dumpstack: Random printk changes Namhyung Kim
2011-03-10 22:25 ` [tip:x86/cleanups] x86, dumpstack: Cleanup printks tip-bot for Namhyung Kim
2011-03-08 11:44 ` [PATCH v4 -tip 3/4] x86, dumpstack: Rename print_context_stack and friends Namhyung Kim
2011-03-10 22:25 ` [tip:x86/cleanups] " tip-bot for Namhyung Kim
2011-03-08 11:44 ` [PATCH v4 -tip 4/4] x86, dumpstack: Use frame pointer during stack trace Namhyung Kim
2011-03-10 22:26 ` [tip:x86/cleanups] " tip-bot for Namhyung Kim
2011-03-10 23:02 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-03-23 13:08 ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
2011-03-23 14:08 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-03-23 14:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-03-10 22:24 ` [tip:x86/cleanups] x86, dumpstack: Correct stack dump info when frame pointer is available tip-bot for Namhyung Kim
2011-03-10 22:46 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-03-11 19:54 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1300885734.1479.6.camel@leonhard \
--to=namhyung@gmail.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox