public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Anton Blanchard <anton@au1.ibm.com>,
	Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>,
	Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@google.com>,
	Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>, Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
	Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com>,
	Bharata B Rao <bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 00/14] Rewrite sched_domain/sched_group creation
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 22:46:41 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1301089601.2250.314.camel@laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110314150613.749843433@chello.nl>

On Mon, 2011-03-14 at 16:06 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> So I got annoyed with the whole sched_domain/sched_group creation mess again
> and decided to actuall do something about it. See here ;-)
> 
> Its not completely done yet, but much of the ground-work is there.
> 
> The final goal is to be able to have a simple way to dynamically specify the
> architecture topoplogy and have the generic code in charge of building the data
> structures. The architecture would need to provide a function that maps a cpu
> to a cpumask and a function that initializes the sched_domain (flags etc.),
> this would replace the now still hard-coded __build_*_sched_domain() calls in
> __build_sched_domains().

Got to here last friday a week ago, and started on:

> With that we can also kill the current NODE and ALLNODES mess and generate
> appropriate masks from say the ACPI SLIT table by grouping CPUs on their node
> distance.

which I just finished.

> This would allow us to kill the horrid mess in x86's cpu_coregroup_mask() and
> properly support the AMD magnycours stuff.

Still todo.

> Anyway, not quite there yet.. patches build and boot on a 2*6*2 wsm box.

Still boots, although a 2 node system isn't very interesting.

I pushed out an updated version to:

  git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/peterz/linux-2.6-sched.git sched_domain

we're now at:

 include/linux/sched.h    |   26 +-
 include/linux/topology.h |   25 -
 kernel/cpuset.c          |    2 +-
 kernel/sched.c           | 1094 ++++++++++++++++------------------------------
 kernel/sched_fair.c      |   32 +-
 5 files changed, 407 insertions(+), 772 deletions(-)




  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-03-25 21:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-03-14 15:06 [RFC][PATCH 00/14] Rewrite sched_domain/sched_group creation Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-14 15:06 ` [RFC][PATCH 01/14] sched: Remove obsolete arch_ prefixes Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-14 15:06 ` [RFC][PATCH 02/14] sched: Simplify cpu_power initialization Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-14 21:35   ` Steven Rostedt
2011-03-14 21:46     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-14 15:06 ` [RFC][PATCH 03/14] sched: Simplify build_sched_groups Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-14 15:06 ` [RFC][PATCH 04/14] sched: Change NODE sched_domain group creation Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-14 15:06 ` [RFC][PATCH 05/14] sched: Clean up some ALLNODES code Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-14 15:06 ` [RFC][PATCH 06/14] Simplify group creation Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-14 15:06 ` [RFC][PATCH 07/14] sched: Simplify finding the lowest sched_domain Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-14 15:06 ` [RFC][PATCH 08/14] sched: Simplify sched_groups_power initialization Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-14 15:06 ` [RFC][PATCH 09/14] sched: Dynamically allocate sched_domain/sched_group data-structures Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-18  9:08   ` Bharata B Rao
2011-03-18  9:37     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-19  1:23   ` Venkatesh Pallipadi
2011-03-25 21:06     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-14 15:06 ` [RFC][PATCH 10/14] sched: Simplify the free path some Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-14 15:06 ` [RFC][PATCH 11/14] sched: Reduce some allocation pressure Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-14 15:06 ` [RFC][PATCH 12/14] sched: Simplify NODE/ALLNODES domain creation Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-14 15:06 ` [RFC][PATCH 13/14] sched: Remove nodemask allocation Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-14 15:06 ` [RFC][PATCH 14/14] sched: Remove some dead code Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-25 21:46 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2011-03-25 21:53   ` [RFC][PATCH 00/14] Rewrite sched_domain/sched_group creation Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1301089601.2250.314.camel@laptop \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=andreas.herrmann3@amd.com \
    --cc=anton@au1.ibm.com \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=pjt@google.com \
    --cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=venki@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox