From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH,RFC] perf: panic due to inclied cpu context task_ctx value
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 16:57:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1301324275.4859.25.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110328133033.GA8254@redhat.com>
On Mon, 2011-03-28 at 15:30 +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 03/26, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 2011-03-26 at 18:35 +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > > On 03/26, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On 03/26, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/kernel/perf_event.c b/kernel/perf_event.c
> > > > > index c75925c..e9e4e35 100644
> > > > > --- a/kernel/perf_event.c
> > > > > +++ b/kernel/perf_event.c
> > > > > @@ -1073,6 +1073,8 @@ event_sched_out(struct perf_event *event,
> > > > > if (!is_software_event(event))
> > > > > cpuctx->active_oncpu--;
> > > > > ctx->nr_active--;
> > > > > + if (!ctx->nr_active && cpuctx->task_ctx == ctx)
> > > > > + cpuctx->task_ctx = NULL;
> > > >
> > > > If we clear cpuctx->task_ctx, we should also clear ctx->is_active.
> >
> > Right.
>
> Wait... Yes, we have to clear ctx->is_active, otherwise we break, say,
> perf_install_in_context().
>
> But if we clear ->is_active we break perf_event_enable(). Suppose we
> are doing ioctl(PERF_EVENT_IOC_DISABLE) + ioctl(PERF_EVENT_IOC_ENABLE).
> PERF_EVENT_IOC_DISABLE can sched_out the last event, but _IOC_ENABLE
> treats ctx->is_active == F as "it is not running".
Right, same for the tick, if say we can only schedule 1 event at a time
and we close the 1 event that is active, the tick will not rotate a new
event in.
/me goes ponder things..
> Btw, why ctx_sched_out() checks nr_events under perf_pmu_disable() ?
hysterical-raisins or somesuch, how about the below:
---
Subject: perf: Optimize ctx_sched_out
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Date: Mon Mar 28 16:55:36 CEST 2011
Oleg noted that ctx_sched_out() disables the PMU even though it might
not actually do something, avoid needless PMU-disabling.
Reported-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
LKML-Reference: <new-submission>
---
kernel/perf_event.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/perf_event.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/perf_event.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/perf_event.c
@@ -1767,7 +1767,6 @@ static void ctx_sched_out(struct perf_ev
struct perf_event *event;
raw_spin_lock(&ctx->lock);
- perf_pmu_disable(ctx->pmu);
ctx->is_active = 0;
if (likely(!ctx->nr_events))
goto out;
@@ -1777,6 +1776,7 @@ static void ctx_sched_out(struct perf_ev
if (!ctx->nr_active)
goto out;
+ perf_pmu_disable(ctx->pmu);
if (event_type & EVENT_PINNED) {
list_for_each_entry(event, &ctx->pinned_groups, group_entry)
group_sched_out(event, cpuctx, ctx);
@@ -1786,8 +1786,8 @@ static void ctx_sched_out(struct perf_ev
list_for_each_entry(event, &ctx->flexible_groups, group_entry)
group_sched_out(event, cpuctx, ctx);
}
-out:
perf_pmu_enable(ctx->pmu);
+out:
raw_spin_unlock(&ctx->lock);
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-28 14:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-24 16:44 [PATCH,RFC] perf: panic due to inclied cpu context task_ctx value Jiri Olsa
2011-03-25 19:10 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-03-26 15:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-26 16:13 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-03-26 16:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-26 17:09 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-03-26 17:35 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-03-26 18:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-26 18:49 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-03-28 13:30 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-03-28 14:57 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2011-03-28 15:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-28 15:15 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-03-28 16:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-28 15:39 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-03-28 15:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-28 16:56 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-03-29 8:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-29 10:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-29 16:28 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-03-29 19:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-30 13:09 ` Jiri Olsa
2011-03-30 14:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-30 16:37 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-03-30 18:30 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-03-30 19:53 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-03-30 21:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-30 21:35 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-03-31 10:32 ` Jiri Olsa
2011-03-31 12:41 ` [tip:perf/urgent] perf: Fix task context scheduling tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-31 13:28 ` [PATCH,RFC] perf: panic due to inclied cpu context task_ctx value Oleg Nesterov
2011-03-31 13:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-31 14:10 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-04 16:20 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-03-30 15:32 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-03-30 15:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-30 15:52 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-03-30 15:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-30 16:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-30 17:13 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-03-26 17:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1301324275.4859.25.camel@twins \
--to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox