From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@gnu.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] mce: fix RCU lockdep from mce_poll()
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 23:13:24 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1301537604.2140.21.camel@offworld> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110331013750.GJ21838@one.firstfloor.org>
Based on the following message
===================================================
[ INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage. ]
---------------------------------------------------
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c:1628 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection!
other info that might help us debug this:
rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 1
no locks held by mcelog/2350.
stack backtrace:
Pid: 2350, comm: mcelog Tainted: G W 2.6.37-rc1+ #7
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff8108e6d4>] lockdep_rcu_dereference+0xa4/0xc0
[<ffffffff810189e9>] mce_poll+0xa9/0xd0
[<ffffffff81160585>] do_sys_poll+0x275/0x550
[<ffffffff8115f0e0>] ? __pollwait+0x0/0xf0
[<ffffffff8115f1d0>] ? pollwake+0x0/0x60
[<ffffffff8115f1d0>] ? pollwake+0x0/0x60
[<ffffffff8130431c>] ? rcu_read_lock_held+0x2c/0x30
[<ffffffff8130549a>] ? radix_tree_lookup_element+0xda/0x100
[<ffffffff81121f08>] ? __do_fault+0x128/0x470
[<ffffffff81100bdb>] ? filemap_fault+0xdb/0x4e0
[<ffffffff810ffe75>] ? unlock_page+0x25/0x30
[<ffffffff81069ddf>] ? sigprocmask+0x3f/0x100
[<ffffffff8183672b>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x2b/0x60
[<ffffffff8108fefd>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x13d/0x180
[<ffffffff8108ff4d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10
[<ffffffff8183672b>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x2b/0x60
[<ffffffff811608a7>] sys_ppoll+0x47/0x190
[<ffffffff8108fefd>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x13d/0x180
[<ffffffff81835d39>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x3a/0x3f
[<ffffffff810030eb>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
This code is simply checking the value of the pointer, and therefore need not protect any actual dereferences.
Replace rcu_dereference_check_mce() with rcu_dereference_index_check().
Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@gnu.org>
Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
This patch reflects the summary of the activity in https://lkml.org/lkml/2010/11/5/236
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c | 3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
index 5a05ef6..6cad5dc 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
@@ -1626,7 +1626,8 @@ out:
static unsigned int mce_poll(struct file *file, poll_table *wait)
{
poll_wait(file, &mce_wait, wait);
- if (rcu_dereference_check_mce(mcelog.next))
+ if (rcu_dereference_index_check(mcelog.next,
+ rcu_read_lock_sched_held()))
return POLLIN | POLLRDNORM;
if (!mce_apei_read_done && apei_check_mce())
return POLLIN | POLLRDNORM;
--
1.7.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-31 2:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-05 21:44 [PATCH] mce: fix RCU lockdep from mce_log() Davidlohr Bueso
2010-11-05 21:48 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2010-11-06 18:53 ` Andi Kleen
2010-11-07 13:39 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-11-08 11:30 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2010-11-08 13:17 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-11-10 13:44 ` [PATCH] mce: fix RCU lockdep from mce_poll() Davidlohr Bueso
2011-03-29 9:45 ` [PATCH] mce: fix RCU lockdep from mce_log() Zdenek Kabelac
2011-03-31 1:14 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2011-03-31 1:37 ` Andi Kleen
2011-03-31 2:13 ` Davidlohr Bueso [this message]
2011-03-31 9:30 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86, mce: Fix RCU lockdep from mce_poll() tip-bot for Davidlohr Bueso
2011-03-31 10:03 ` Zdenek Kabelac
2011-03-31 16:41 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-03-31 21:32 ` Zdenek Kabelac
2011-03-31 22:50 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1301537604.2140.21.camel@offworld \
--to=dave@gnu.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox