From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758275AbXJCMQR (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Oct 2007 08:16:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755713AbXJCMQI (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Oct 2007 08:16:08 -0400 Received: from kuber.nabble.com ([216.139.236.158]:38544 "EHLO kuber.nabble.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755120AbXJCMQH (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Oct 2007 08:16:07 -0400 Message-ID: <13017702.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 05:16:05 -0700 (PDT) From: Giana To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: I have a problem with signal mask MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: Giana_gn@yahoo.com Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello, I have done Streams multiplexers in Linux kernel. Created two multiplexers and I could open these 2, close the file descriptors of each and could link/unlink one with another properly . But after linking, if i close the descriptor of the linked one: my signals are unblocked automatically.... Scenario: 1. Created 2 Multiplexers. Link B under A. 2. Now I set SIG_BLOCK to my current running process. 3. Close file descriptor of B 4. Now the signals are received by the process, It automatically goes for UN_BLOCK 5. But I want the SIG_BLOCK state should be continued in this case.... Only in this scenario, it happens. All other scenarios like (Unlink without close fd / close fd with out link) works fine.... Please give me some suggestion on this.... Thanks & Regards, Giana -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/I-have-a-problem-with-signal-mask-tf4561448.html#a13017702 Sent from the linux-kernel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.