* I have a problem with signal mask
@ 2007-10-03 12:16 Giana
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Giana @ 2007-10-03 12:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Hello,
I have done Streams multiplexers in Linux kernel. Created two multiplexers
and I could open these 2, close the file descriptors of each and could
link/unlink one with another properly .
But after linking, if i close the descriptor of the linked one: my signals
are unblocked automatically....
Scenario:
1. Created 2 Multiplexers. Link B under A.
2. Now I set SIG_BLOCK to my current running process.
3. Close file descriptor of B
4. Now the signals are received by the process, It automatically goes for
UN_BLOCK
5. But I want the SIG_BLOCK state should be continued in this case....
Only in this scenario, it happens. All other scenarios like (Unlink without
close fd / close fd with out link) works fine....
Please give me some suggestion on this....
Thanks & Regards,
Giana
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/I-have-a-problem-with-signal-mask-tf4561448.html#a13017702
Sent from the linux-kernel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2007-10-03 12:16 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-10-03 12:16 I have a problem with signal mask Giana
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox