From: "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@microsoft.com>
To: gregkh@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
devel@linuxdriverproject.org, virtualization@lists.osdl.org
Cc: "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@microsoft.com>
Subject: [RESEND PATCH 00/22] Staging: hv: Cleanup-storage-drivers-phase-II
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 07:04:21 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1302012261-21236-1-git-send-email-kys@microsoft.com> (raw)
This patch-set restructures and cleans up struct hv_storvsc_request.
In the current code, two data structures: struct hv_storvsc_request
and struct storvsc_request_extension together are used to carry
the I/O state and there are many issues with this current
architecture:
1) The memory for extension data structure
is allocatted just after the data buffer
field in struct hv_storvsc_request resulting in comments
such as this in struct blkvsc_request (blkvsc_drv.c):
/*
* !!!DO NOT ADD ANYTHING BELOW HERE!!! Otherwise, memory can overlap,
* because - The extension buffer falls right here and is pointed to by
* request.Extension;
* Which sounds like a horrible idea, who designed this?
*/
2) State is unnecessarily replicated in both struct hv_storvsc_request
and the struct vstor_packet that is embedded in
struct storvsc_request_extension.
This patch-set addresses the above issues by geting rid of replicated
state and consolidating all necessary state into a single data structure.
We also deal with a range of other cleanups in this patch-set:
1) Use completion primitives to wait for completion.
2) Get rid of the synch primitive in struct blkvsc_request
3) Get rid of the need for struct hv_device to be the first
element of struct host_device_context.
Regards,
K. Y
next reply other threads:[~2011-04-05 13:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-05 14:04 K. Y. Srinivasan [this message]
2011-04-05 14:04 ` [PATCH 01/22] Staging: hv: Move the definition of struct storvsc_request_extension K. Y. Srinivasan
2011-04-05 14:04 ` [PATCH 02/22] Staging: hv: Embed struct storvsc_request_extension into hv_storvsc_request K. Y. Srinivasan
2011-04-05 14:04 ` [PATCH 03/22] Staging: hv: Get rid of request_ext_size from struct storvsc_driver_object K. Y. Srinivasan
2011-04-05 14:04 ` [PATCH 04/22] Staging: hv: Add a function to map a hv_driver pointer to storvsc driver K. Y. Srinivasan
2011-04-05 14:04 ` [PATCH 05/22] Staging: hv: Use struct completion in struct storvsc_request_extension K. Y. Srinivasan
2011-04-05 14:04 ` [PATCH 06/22] Staging: hv: Allocate request structures zeroed out K. Y. Srinivasan
2011-04-05 14:04 ` [PATCH 07/22] Staging: hv: Get rid of the type field from struct hv_storvsc_request K. Y. Srinivasan
2011-04-05 14:04 ` [PATCH 08/22] Staging: hv: Get rid of the host " K. Y. Srinivasan
2011-04-05 14:04 ` [PATCH 09/22] Staging: hv: Get rid of the bus " K. Y. Srinivasan
2011-04-05 14:04 ` [PATCH 10/22] Staging: hv: Get rid of the target_id " K. Y. Srinivasan
2011-04-05 14:04 ` [PATCH 11/22] Staging: hv: Get rid of lun_id " K. Y. Srinivasan
2011-04-05 14:04 ` [PATCH 12/22] Staging: hv: Get rid of the cdb_len " K. Y. Srinivasan
2011-04-05 14:04 ` [PATCH 13/22] Staging: hv: Get rid of cdb " K. Y. Srinivasan
2011-04-05 14:04 ` [PATCH 14/22] Staging: hv: Get rid of sense_buffer_size " K. Y. Srinivasan
2011-04-05 14:04 ` [PATCH 15/22] Staging: hv: Move sense_buffer field K. Y. Srinivasan
2011-04-05 14:05 ` [PATCH 16/22] Staging: hv: Move the context field from struct hv_storvsc_request K. Y. Srinivasan
2011-04-05 14:05 ` [PATCH 17/22] Staging: hv: Move on_io_completion() " K. Y. Srinivasan
2011-04-05 14:05 ` [PATCH 18/22] Staging: hv: Get rid of the status field " K. Y. Srinivasan
2011-04-05 14:05 ` [PATCH 19/22] Staging: hv: Get rid of the bytes_xfer " K. Y. Srinivasan
2011-04-05 14:05 ` [PATCH 20/22] Staging: hv: Move the data_buffer " K. Y. Srinivasan
2011-04-05 14:05 ` [PATCH 21/22] Staging: hv: Rename struct storvsc_request_extension K. Y. Srinivasan
2011-04-05 14:05 ` [PATCH 22/22] Staging: hv: Get rid of synch primitive in struct blkvsc_request K. Y. Srinivasan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1302012261-21236-1-git-send-email-kys@microsoft.com \
--to=kys@microsoft.com \
--cc=devel@linuxdriverproject.org \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox