From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: Bernd Petrovitsch <bernd@petrovitsch.priv.at>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: depends on tristate logic (was: [PATCH] rfkill: Regulator consumer driver for rfkill)
Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2011 12:42:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1302172934.3779.10.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1302172417.21251.48.camel@thorin>
[trimming distribution list, changing subject]
> > > Boolean operators for tristate logic isn't intuitive at all IMHO.
> >
> > *shrug*. You're free to propose patches to the kconfig system to make it
> > more intuitive. :-)
>
> FullACK;-)
> But no intuitive tristate logic operators come to my mind (otherwise I
> would have mentioned them above).
> And there are more logic implications in "depends on RFKILL".
Yes, of course. And you have to consider four basic possibilities:
bool BFOO1
depends on BBAR
bool BFOO2
depends on TBAR
and
tristate TFOO1
depends on BBAR
tristate TFOO2
depends on TBAR
(where the first letter indicates bool vs. tristate)
Then, you get a number of restrictions like this (iirc):
XBAR = n => YFOON = n
(8 restrictions for the different values of X, Y, N)
TBAR = m => TFOO2 = m || TFOO2 = n
And those should be all restrictions there are, I think?
johannes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-07 10:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-06 9:21 [PATCH] rfkill: Regulator consumer driver for rfkill Antonio Ospite
2011-04-06 9:29 ` Johannes Berg
2011-04-06 14:06 ` Antonio Ospite
2011-04-06 14:09 ` Johannes Berg
2011-04-06 14:24 ` Antonio Ospite
2011-04-06 14:50 ` Joey Lee
2011-04-08 10:59 ` [PATCH v2] " Antonio Ospite
2011-04-12 11:41 ` Johannes Berg
2011-04-12 11:44 ` Johannes Berg
2011-04-12 15:15 ` Mark Brown
2011-04-12 15:23 ` Johannes Berg
2011-04-13 16:53 ` Mark Brown
2011-04-13 8:44 ` Antonio Ospite
2011-04-13 9:19 ` Johannes Berg
2011-04-13 19:40 ` [PATCH v3] " Antonio Ospite
2011-04-13 19:53 ` Johannes Berg
2011-04-14 10:39 ` Antonio Ospite
2011-04-14 13:06 ` Mark Brown
2011-04-15 10:24 ` Antonio Ospite
2011-04-13 8:53 ` [PATCH v2] " Antonio Ospite
2011-04-06 14:11 ` [PATCH] " Mark Brown
2011-04-06 14:21 ` Johannes Berg
2011-04-06 18:12 ` Paul Bolle
2011-04-06 18:38 ` John W. Linville
2011-04-06 20:10 ` Paul Bolle
2011-04-06 20:15 ` Johannes Berg
2011-04-06 20:17 ` Johannes Berg
2011-04-06 20:19 ` Johannes Berg
2011-04-06 18:46 ` Johannes Berg
2011-04-07 10:01 ` Bernd Petrovitsch
2011-04-07 10:09 ` Johannes Berg
2011-04-07 10:33 ` Bernd Petrovitsch
2011-04-07 10:42 ` Johannes Berg [this message]
2011-04-06 14:29 ` Antonio Ospite
2011-04-06 14:32 ` Johannes Berg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1302172934.3779.10.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net \
--to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=bernd@petrovitsch.priv.at \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).