From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756804Ab1DHNTx (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Apr 2011 09:19:53 -0400 Received: from e8.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.138]:37590 "EHLO e8.ny.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753031Ab1DHNTw (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Apr 2011 09:19:52 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] make new alloc_pages_exact() From: Dave Hansen To: Michal Nazarewicz Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Timur Tabi , Andi Kleen , Mel Gorman , Andrew Morton In-Reply-To: References: <20110407172104.1F8B7329@kernel> <20110407172105.831B9A0A@kernel> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2011 06:19:46 -0700 Message-ID: <1302268786.8184.6879.camel@nimitz> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 14:28 +0200, Michal Nazarewicz wrote: > On Thu, 07 Apr 2011 19:21:05 +0200, Dave Hansen > wrote: > > +struct page *__alloc_pages_exact(gfp_t gfp_mask, size_t size) > > { > > unsigned int order = get_order(size); > > - unsigned long addr; > > + struct page *page; > > - addr = __get_free_pages(gfp_mask, order); > > - if (addr) { > > - unsigned long alloc_end = addr + (PAGE_SIZE << order); > > - unsigned long used = addr + PAGE_ALIGN(size); > > + page = alloc_pages(gfp_mask, order); > > + if (page) { > > + struct page *alloc_end = page + (1 << order); > > + struct page *used = page + PAGE_ALIGN(size)/PAGE_SIZE; > > - split_page(virt_to_page((void *)addr), order); > > + split_page(page, order); > > while (used < alloc_end) { > > - free_page(used); > > - used += PAGE_SIZE; > > + __free_page(used); > > + used++; > > } > > Have you thought about moving this loop to a separate function, ie. > _free_page_range(start, end)? I'm asking because this loop appears > in two places and my CMA would also benefit from such a function. Sounds like a good idea to me. Were you thinking start/end 'struct page's as arguments? -- Dave