Re: [RFC][PATCH 5/9] perf: Simplify and fix __perf_install_in_context

[Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>]

On Sat, 2011-04-09 at 21:17 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> +       if (task_ctx) {
> +               task_ctx_sched_out(task_ctx);
> +               /*
> +                * If the context we're installing events in is not the
> +                * active task_ctx, flip them.
> +                */
> +               if (ctx->task && task_ctx != ctx) {
> +                       raw_spin_unlock(&cpuctx->ctx.lock);
> +                       raw_spin_lock(&ctx->lock);
> +                       cpuctx->task_ctx = task_ctx = ctx;
> +               }
> +               task = task_ctx->task;
> +       } 

That is actually buggy, it should read something like:

	if (task_ctx)
		task_ctx_sched_out(task_ctx);

	if (ctx->task && task_ctx != ctx) {
		raw_spin_unlock(&task_ctx->lock);
		raw_spin_lock(&ctx->lock);
		cpuctx->task_ctx = task_ctx = ctx;
	}

	if (task_ctx)
		task = task_ctx->task;

Aside from the trivial locking bug fixed, the previous version wouldn't
actually deal with installing a task_ctx where there was none before.