linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>
Subject: Re: Strange block/scsi/workqueue issue
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 09:42:17 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1302597737.2661.5.camel@dolmen> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1302584571.2558.24.camel@mulgrave.site>

Hi,

On Tue, 2011-04-12 at 00:02 -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 23:49 -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> > The entangled deadlock seems to have been introduced by commit
> > 3cca6dc1c81e2407928dc4c6105252146fd3924f prior to that, there was no
> > synchronous cancel in the destroy path.
> > 
> > A fix might be to shunt more stuff off to workqueues, but that's
> > producing a more complex system which would be prone to entanglements
> > that would be even harder to spot.
> > 
> > Perhaps a better solution is just not to use sync cancellations in
> > block?  As long as the work in the queue holds a queue ref, they can be
> > done asynchronously.
> 
> So this is a possible implementation, does this fix the problem?
> (compile tested only).
> 
> James
> 
> ---
> 
> diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
> index 90f22cc..f600f88 100644
> --- a/block/blk-core.c
> +++ b/block/blk-core.c
> @@ -219,6 +219,7 @@ static void blk_delay_work(struct work_struct *work)
>  	spin_lock_irq(q->queue_lock);
>  	__blk_run_queue(q, false);
>  	spin_unlock_irq(q->queue_lock);
> +	blk_put_queue(q);
>  }
>  
>  /**
> @@ -233,7 +234,8 @@ static void blk_delay_work(struct work_struct *work)
>   */
>  void blk_delay_queue(struct request_queue *q, unsigned long msecs)
>  {
> -	schedule_delayed_work(&q->delay_work, msecs_to_jiffies(msecs));
> +	if (!blk_get_queue(q))
> +		schedule_delayed_work(&q->delay_work, msecs_to_jiffies(msecs));
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_delay_queue);
>  
> @@ -271,7 +273,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_start_queue);
>   **/
>  void blk_stop_queue(struct request_queue *q)
>  {
> -	__cancel_delayed_work(&q->delay_work);
> +	if (__cancel_delayed_work(&q->delay_work))
> +		blk_put_queue(q);
>  	queue_flag_set(QUEUE_FLAG_STOPPED, q);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_stop_queue);
> @@ -297,7 +300,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_stop_queue);
>  void blk_sync_queue(struct request_queue *q)
>  {
>  	del_timer_sync(&q->timeout);
> -	cancel_delayed_work_sync(&q->delay_work);
> +	if (__cancel_delayed_work(&q->delay_work))
> +		blk_put_queue(q);
>  	queue_sync_plugs(q);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_sync_queue);
> 
> 

Just done a couple of tests, with the following results:

#1. Including Tejun's patch:

scsi 0:0:32:0: Enclosure         DP       BACKPLANE        1.07 PQ: 0 ANSI: 5
scsi 0:2:0:0: Direct-Access     DELL     PERC 6/i         1.22 PQ: 0 ANSI: 5
scsi 0:2:1:0: Direct-Access     DELL     PERC 6/i         1.22 PQ: 0 ANSI: 5
------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: at lib/kref.c:34 kref_get+0x2d/0x30()
Hardware name: PowerEdge R710
Modules linked in:
Pid: 18, comm: kworker/4:0 Not tainted 2.6.39-rc2+ #189
Call Trace:
 [<ffffffff8108fa9a>] warn_slowpath_common+0x7a/0xb0
 [<ffffffff8108fae5>] warn_slowpath_null+0x15/0x20
 [<ffffffff813c983d>] kref_get+0x2d/0x30
 [<ffffffff813c823a>] kobject_get+0x1a/0x30
 [<ffffffff81460864>] get_device+0x14/0x20
 [<ffffffff81478bc7>] scsi_request_fn+0x37/0x4a0
 [<ffffffff813aff2a>] __blk_run_queue+0x6a/0x110
 [<ffffffff813b2481>] blk_delay_work+0x31/0x60
 [<ffffffff810aa9c7>] process_one_work+0x197/0x520
 [<ffffffff810aa961>] ? process_one_work+0x131/0x520
 [<ffffffff813b2450>] ? blk_alloc_queue+0x10/0x10
 [<ffffffff810acfec>] worker_thread+0x15c/0x330
 [<ffffffff810ace90>] ? manage_workers.clone.20+0x240/0x240
 [<ffffffff810ace90>] ? manage_workers.clone.20+0x240/0x240
 [<ffffffff810b1f16>] kthread+0xa6/0xb0
 [<ffffffff81687164>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
 [<ffffffff8107fe1f>] ? finish_task_switch+0x6f/0x110
 [<ffffffff8167ecd6>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x46/0x70
 [<ffffffff8167f098>] ? retint_restore_args+0x13/0x13
 [<ffffffff810b1e70>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x70/0x70
 [<ffffffff81687160>] ? gs_change+0x13/0x13
---[ end trace c35781f847a41f31 ]---

#2 On its own:

scsi 0:0:32:0: Enclosure         DP       BACKPLANE        1.07 PQ: 0 ANSI: 5
scsi 0:2:0:0: Direct-Access     DELL     PERC 6/i         1.22 PQ: 0 ANSI: 5
scsi 0:2:1:0: Direct-Access     DELL     PERC 6/i         1.22 PQ: 0 ANSI: 5
BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000008
IP: [<ffffffff810ab4d3>] __queue_work+0x403/0x460
PGD 0 
Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP 
last sysfs file: 
CPU 0 
Modules linked in:

Pid: 3, comm: ksoftirqd/0 Not tainted 2.6.39-rc2+ #190 Dell Inc. PowerEdge R710/0N047H
RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff810ab4d3>]  [<ffffffff810ab4d3>] __queue_work+0x403/0x460
RSP: 0018:ffff8800c90abb20  EFLAGS: 00010046
RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff8800c56a8c58 RCX: ffff8800c56a8c60
RDX: ffff8800c56a8c60 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff8800cb00e388
RBP: ffff8800c90abb70 R08: 0000000000000900 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff8800cb00e340
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff8800cb1d6700 R15: 0000000000000000
FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8800cb000000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b
CR2: 0000000000000008 CR3: 0000000001c33000 CR4: 00000000000006f0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Process ksoftirqd/0 (pid: 3, threadinfo ffff8800c90aa000, task ffff8800c90a80c0)
Stack:
 ffff8800c90abb90 0000000000000086 0000000000000000 0000000000000086
 ffff8800c90a80c0 ffff8800c92ebe00 ffff8800c56a8c58 ffff8800c88bac28
 ffff8800c90abc30 ffff8800c565c080 ffff8800c90abb80 ffffffff810ab59d
Call Trace:
 [<ffffffff810ab59d>] queue_work_on+0x1d/0x30
 [<ffffffff810ac749>] queue_work+0x29/0x60
 [<ffffffff810ac865>] queue_delayed_work+0x25/0x30
 [<ffffffff813aff75>] __blk_run_queue+0xb5/0x110
 [<ffffffff813b04ed>] blk_run_queue+0x2d/0x50
 [<ffffffff8147715a>] scsi_run_queue+0xea/0x3f0
 [<ffffffff814710cf>] ? __scsi_put_command+0x5f/0xa0
 [<ffffffff814793cd>] scsi_next_command+0x3d/0x60
 [<ffffffff81479602>] scsi_io_completion+0x1b2/0x630
 [<ffffffff81470cd7>] scsi_finish_command+0xc7/0x130
 [<ffffffff8147936f>] scsi_softirq_done+0x13f/0x160
 [<ffffffff813b8252>] blk_done_softirq+0xa2/0xc0
 [<ffffffff810970ac>] __do_softirq+0xdc/0x290
 [<ffffffff81097395>] run_ksoftirqd+0x135/0x250
 [<ffffffff81097260>] ? __do_softirq+0x290/0x290
 [<ffffffff810b1f16>] kthread+0xa6/0xb0
 [<ffffffff816870e4>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
 [<ffffffff8107fe1f>] ? finish_task_switch+0x6f/0x110
 [<ffffffff8167ec56>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x46/0x70
 [<ffffffff8167f018>] ? retint_restore_args+0x13/0x13
 [<ffffffff810b1e70>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x70/0x70
 [<ffffffff816870e0>] ? gs_change+0x13/0x13
Code: 8b 44 24 48 49 8d 7c 24 48 48 83 e8 08 31 f6 eb 27 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 48 8b 00 49 89 c0 41 80 e0 00 a8 04 48 89 f0 49 0f 45 c0 
 8b 40 08 f6 00 10 74 14 48 8d 41 f8 48 8b 48 08 48 8d 50 08 
RIP  [<ffffffff810ab4d3>] __queue_work+0x403/0x460
 RSP <ffff8800c90abb20>
CR2: 0000000000000008
---[ end trace 52fce2e9afb9bf59 ]---
Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception in interrupt

These are both on the same base kernel as yesterday (i.e. Linus tree
from this time yesterday morning) plus a few GFS2 patches, but they
only affect the GFS2 module which is not loaded.

I don't do anything special to trigger the problem - it happens of its
own accord during normal boot. The initscripts are those from f14.

Steve.




  reply	other threads:[~2011-04-12  8:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-04-11 14:56 Strange block/scsi/workqueue issue Steven Whitehouse
2011-04-11 17:18 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-11 17:29   ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-11 17:52   ` Steven Whitehouse
2011-04-12  0:14     ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-12  8:49       ` Steven Whitehouse
2011-04-12  0:47   ` James Bottomley
2011-04-12  2:51     ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-12  4:49       ` James Bottomley
2011-04-12  5:02         ` James Bottomley
2011-04-12  8:42           ` Steven Whitehouse [this message]
2011-04-12 13:42             ` James Bottomley
2011-04-12 14:06               ` Steven Whitehouse
2011-04-12 15:14                 ` James Bottomley
2011-04-12 16:04                   ` Steven Whitehouse
2011-04-12 16:27                     ` James Bottomley
2011-04-12 16:51                       ` Steven Whitehouse
2011-04-12 17:41                         ` James Bottomley
2011-04-12 18:33                           ` Steven Whitehouse
2011-04-12 19:56                             ` James Bottomley
2011-04-12 20:30                               ` Steven Whitehouse
2011-04-12 20:43                                 ` James Bottomley
2011-04-13  5:18                                   ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-13  6:06                                     ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-13  9:20                                       ` Steven Whitehouse
2011-04-13 14:00                                         ` Steven Whitehouse
2011-04-13 17:01                                           ` James Bottomley
2011-04-13 19:35                                             ` Steven Whitehouse
2011-04-13 20:12                                             ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-13 20:17                                               ` James Bottomley
2011-04-22 18:01                                                 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-22 18:06                                                   ` James Bottomley
2011-04-22 18:30                                                     ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-31  6:05                                             ` Anton V. Boyarshinov
2011-04-22 18:03                                           ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-12  5:15         ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-12 15:15           ` James Bottomley
2011-04-13  5:11             ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-13 14:15               ` James Bottomley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1302597737.2661.5.camel@dolmen \
    --to=swhiteho@redhat.com \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
    --cc=jaxboe@fusionio.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).