linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>
Subject: Re: Strange block/scsi/workqueue issue
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 15:43:56 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1302641036.2604.40.camel@mulgrave.site> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1302640226.2661.34.camel@dolmen>

On Tue, 2011-04-12 at 21:30 +0100, Steven Whitehouse wrote:
> > Hmm, wrong signal for no elevator then.  How about this?
> > 
> > James
> > 
> That seems to do the trick... the box has been booted for several
> minutes now and no sign of anything untoward so far :-)
> 
> Below is the cumulative patch which I now have applied to the kernel.
> Many thanks for all your help in debugging this, its greatly
> appreciated :-)

Heh, you're welcome, but this is for some value of debug.  There's still
something strange going on on your box causing extreme delays in the way
we do stuff.  I took advantage of the delays to explore some races in
block and SCSI, which is what got fixed .. I've still no idea what the
actual root cause of the delays is.

Now we need to huddle and decide what we're doing in block and SCSI.  I
think Tejun's patch with the moved signal for queue destruction patch
would probably work as well.

James



  reply	other threads:[~2011-04-12 20:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-04-11 14:56 Strange block/scsi/workqueue issue Steven Whitehouse
2011-04-11 17:18 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-11 17:29   ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-11 17:52   ` Steven Whitehouse
2011-04-12  0:14     ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-12  8:49       ` Steven Whitehouse
2011-04-12  0:47   ` James Bottomley
2011-04-12  2:51     ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-12  4:49       ` James Bottomley
2011-04-12  5:02         ` James Bottomley
2011-04-12  8:42           ` Steven Whitehouse
2011-04-12 13:42             ` James Bottomley
2011-04-12 14:06               ` Steven Whitehouse
2011-04-12 15:14                 ` James Bottomley
2011-04-12 16:04                   ` Steven Whitehouse
2011-04-12 16:27                     ` James Bottomley
2011-04-12 16:51                       ` Steven Whitehouse
2011-04-12 17:41                         ` James Bottomley
2011-04-12 18:33                           ` Steven Whitehouse
2011-04-12 19:56                             ` James Bottomley
2011-04-12 20:30                               ` Steven Whitehouse
2011-04-12 20:43                                 ` James Bottomley [this message]
2011-04-13  5:18                                   ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-13  6:06                                     ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-13  9:20                                       ` Steven Whitehouse
2011-04-13 14:00                                         ` Steven Whitehouse
2011-04-13 17:01                                           ` James Bottomley
2011-04-13 19:35                                             ` Steven Whitehouse
2011-04-13 20:12                                             ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-13 20:17                                               ` James Bottomley
2011-04-22 18:01                                                 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-22 18:06                                                   ` James Bottomley
2011-04-22 18:30                                                     ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-31  6:05                                             ` Anton V. Boyarshinov
2011-04-22 18:03                                           ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-12  5:15         ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-12 15:15           ` James Bottomley
2011-04-13  5:11             ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-13 14:15               ` James Bottomley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1302641036.2604.40.camel@mulgrave.site \
    --to=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=jaxboe@fusionio.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=swhiteho@redhat.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).