From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: Antonio Ospite <ospite@studenti.unina.it>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, openezx-devel@lists.openezx.org,
"John W . Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>,
Guiming Zhuo <gmzhuo@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] rfkill: Regulator consumer driver for rfkill
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 11:19:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1302686356.3731.1.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110413104402.d0115659.ospite@studenti.unina.it>
On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 10:44 +0200, Antonio Ospite wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Apr 2011 13:44:02 +0200
> Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2011-04-12 at 13:41 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> >
> > > > + * static struct regulator_consumer_supply pcap_regulator_V6_consumers [] = {
> > > > + * { .dev_name = "rfkill-regulator.0", supply = "vrfkill" },
> > > > + * };
> > >
> > > It's a comment, but it should be .supply = (missing the .)
> > >
>
> well spotted, I'll fix this.
This is the comment I was referring to -- I got confused and thought
this was a struct rfkill_regulator_platform_data.
> That's how the regulator framework works, I know Mark already replied to
> you but I try to elaborate more for the records and to organize my
> thoughts about that:
[snip explanation]
Thanks, ok, I'm just not familiar with the regulator framework and got
confused about the various structs involved.
So the only thing I see wrong is the missing . above, not sure if you
care enough to resend :-)
johannes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-13 9:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-06 9:21 [PATCH] rfkill: Regulator consumer driver for rfkill Antonio Ospite
2011-04-06 9:29 ` Johannes Berg
2011-04-06 14:06 ` Antonio Ospite
2011-04-06 14:09 ` Johannes Berg
2011-04-06 14:24 ` Antonio Ospite
2011-04-06 14:50 ` Joey Lee
2011-04-08 10:59 ` [PATCH v2] " Antonio Ospite
2011-04-12 11:41 ` Johannes Berg
2011-04-12 11:44 ` Johannes Berg
2011-04-12 15:15 ` Mark Brown
2011-04-12 15:23 ` Johannes Berg
2011-04-13 16:53 ` Mark Brown
2011-04-13 8:44 ` Antonio Ospite
2011-04-13 9:19 ` Johannes Berg [this message]
2011-04-13 19:40 ` [PATCH v3] " Antonio Ospite
2011-04-13 19:53 ` Johannes Berg
2011-04-14 10:39 ` Antonio Ospite
2011-04-14 13:06 ` Mark Brown
2011-04-15 10:24 ` Antonio Ospite
2011-04-13 8:53 ` [PATCH v2] " Antonio Ospite
2011-04-06 14:11 ` [PATCH] " Mark Brown
2011-04-06 14:21 ` Johannes Berg
2011-04-06 18:12 ` Paul Bolle
2011-04-06 18:38 ` John W. Linville
2011-04-06 20:10 ` Paul Bolle
2011-04-06 20:15 ` Johannes Berg
2011-04-06 20:17 ` Johannes Berg
2011-04-06 20:19 ` Johannes Berg
2011-04-06 18:46 ` Johannes Berg
2011-04-07 10:01 ` Bernd Petrovitsch
2011-04-07 10:09 ` Johannes Berg
2011-04-07 10:33 ` Bernd Petrovitsch
2011-04-07 10:42 ` depends on tristate logic (was: [PATCH] rfkill: Regulator consumer driver for rfkill) Johannes Berg
2011-04-06 14:29 ` [PATCH] rfkill: Regulator consumer driver for rfkill Antonio Ospite
2011-04-06 14:32 ` Johannes Berg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1302686356.3731.1.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net \
--to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=gmzhuo@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=marek.vasut@gmail.com \
--cc=openezx-devel@lists.openezx.org \
--cc=ospite@studenti.unina.it \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).