linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: "Robert Richter" <robert.richter@amd.com>,
	"Stephane Eranian" <eranian@google.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo" <acme@redhat.com>,
	"Frédéric Weisbecker" <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] perf, x86: Fix event scheduler to solve complex scheduling problems
Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2011 12:15:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1302948940.32491.12.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110416101406.GA11534@elte.hu>

On Sat, 2011-04-16 at 12:14 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Sat, 2011-04-16 at 11:43 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > I'd also prefer if we first had actual testcases in 'perf test' for all these 
> > > failures - it took an *awfully* long time to find these regressions (the event 
> > > scheduler code has been committed for months), while with proper testcases it 
> > > would only take a second to run 'perf test'. 
> > 
> > These cases only exist on AMD F15, I don't think there's many people
> > with such systems around.
> 
> Well, if the trend continues we'll have more twisted constraints and more bugs 
> of this sort, so having a testsuite sure cannot hurt, right?

For sure. But the problem with writing test cases at the perf userspace
level is that they're very hardware specific. It would be much easier to
write unit tests for the solver itself.

  reply	other threads:[~2011-04-16 10:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-04-16  0:27 [PATCH 0/4] perf, x86: Fixes for v2.6.39 Robert Richter
2011-04-16  0:27 ` [PATCH 1/4] perf, x86: Fix pre-defined cache-misses event for AMD family 15h cpus Robert Richter
2011-04-19 12:03   ` [tip:perf/urgent] " tip-bot for Andre Przywara
2011-04-16  0:27 ` [PATCH 2/4] perf, x86: Fix AMD family 15h FPU event constraints Robert Richter
2011-04-19 12:04   ` [tip:perf/urgent] " tip-bot for Robert Richter
2011-04-16  0:27 ` [PATCH 3/4] perf, x86: Use ALTERNATIVE() to check for X86_FEATURE_PERFCTR_CORE Robert Richter
2011-04-18 20:00   ` Andi Kleen
2011-04-19 10:39     ` Robert Richter
2011-04-19 18:21       ` Andi Kleen
2011-04-19 12:04   ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Robert Richter
2011-04-16  0:27 ` [PATCH 4/4] perf, x86: Fix event scheduler to solve complex scheduling problems Robert Richter
2011-04-16  8:51   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-16  9:43     ` Ingo Molnar
2011-04-16 10:08       ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-16 10:14         ` Ingo Molnar
2011-04-16 10:15           ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2011-04-16 14:26         ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2011-04-17  8:15     ` Robert Richter
2011-04-17  8:18       ` Ingo Molnar
2011-04-17  8:53         ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-17 11:23           ` Robert Richter
2011-04-18  8:17             ` Robert Richter
2011-04-16 15:52   ` Stephane Eranian
2011-04-17  8:44     ` Robert Richter
2011-04-17  9:05       ` Stephane Eranian
2011-04-19 10:26   ` [PATCH v2] perf, x86: Fix event scheduler for constraints with overlapping counters Robert Richter
2011-04-19 11:29     ` Ingo Molnar
2011-04-19 13:55       ` Robert Richter
2011-04-28  9:50         ` Robert Richter
2011-05-18 21:16     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-18 21:20       ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-18 21:36         ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-19 10:49           ` Robert Richter
2011-05-19 18:06           ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-20  3:18             ` Robert Richter
2011-09-01 12:56               ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-01 14:12                 ` Robert Richter
2011-09-01 16:37                   ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1302948940.32491.12.camel@twins \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=acme@redhat.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=robert.richter@amd.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).