From: Nikhil Rao <ncrao@google.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>, Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Nikhil Rao <ncrao@google.com>
Subject: [RFC][Patch 11/18] sched: update update_sg_lb_stats() to use u64
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 13:51:30 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1303332697-16426-12-git-send-email-ncrao@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1303332697-16426-1-git-send-email-ncrao@google.com>
Update variable types and 64-bit math in update_sg_lb_stats() to handle u64
weights.
Signed-off-by: Nikhil Rao <ncrao@google.com>
---
kernel/sched_fair.c | 22 +++++++++++++---------
1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched_fair.c b/kernel/sched_fair.c
index 2b030f4..d5b1276 100644
--- a/kernel/sched_fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched_fair.c
@@ -2345,14 +2345,14 @@ struct sd_lb_stats {
* sg_lb_stats - stats of a sched_group required for load_balancing
*/
struct sg_lb_stats {
- unsigned long avg_load; /*Avg load across the CPUs of the group */
- unsigned long group_load; /* Total load over the CPUs of the group */
+ u64 avg_load; /* Avg load across the CPUs of the group */
+ u64 group_load; /* Total load over the CPUs of the group */
unsigned long sum_nr_running; /* Nr tasks running in the group */
- unsigned long sum_weighted_load; /* Weighted load of group's tasks */
+ u64 sum_weighted_load; /* Weighted load of group's tasks */
unsigned long group_capacity;
unsigned long idle_cpus;
unsigned long group_weight;
- int group_imb; /* Is there an imbalance in the group ? */
+ int group_imb; /* Is there an imbalance in the group ? */
int group_has_capacity; /* Is there extra capacity in the group? */
};
@@ -2679,7 +2679,8 @@ static inline void update_sg_lb_stats(struct sched_domain *sd,
int local_group, const struct cpumask *cpus,
int *balance, struct sg_lb_stats *sgs)
{
- unsigned long load, max_cpu_load, min_cpu_load, max_nr_running;
+ u64 load, max_cpu_load, min_cpu_load;
+ unsigned long max_nr_running;
int i;
unsigned int balance_cpu = -1, first_idle_cpu = 0;
unsigned long avg_load_per_task = 0;
@@ -2689,7 +2690,7 @@ static inline void update_sg_lb_stats(struct sched_domain *sd,
/* Tally up the load of all CPUs in the group */
max_cpu_load = 0;
- min_cpu_load = ~0UL;
+ min_cpu_load = ~0ULL;
max_nr_running = 0;
for_each_cpu_and(i, sched_group_cpus(group), cpus) {
@@ -2735,7 +2736,8 @@ static inline void update_sg_lb_stats(struct sched_domain *sd,
}
/* Adjust by relative CPU power of the group */
- sgs->avg_load = (sgs->group_load*SCHED_POWER_SCALE) / group->cpu_power;
+ sgs->avg_load = div_u64(sgs->group_load * SCHED_POWER_SCALE,
+ group->cpu_power);
/*
* Consider the group unbalanced when the imbalance is larger
@@ -2747,9 +2749,11 @@ static inline void update_sg_lb_stats(struct sched_domain *sd,
* the hierarchy?
*/
if (sgs->sum_nr_running)
- avg_load_per_task = sgs->sum_weighted_load / sgs->sum_nr_running;
+ avg_load_per_task = div_u64(sgs->sum_weighted_load,
+ sgs->sum_nr_running);
- if ((max_cpu_load - min_cpu_load) >= avg_load_per_task && max_nr_running > 1)
+ if ((max_cpu_load - min_cpu_load) >= avg_load_per_task &&
+ max_nr_running > 1)
sgs->group_imb = 1;
sgs->group_capacity = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(group->cpu_power,
--
1.7.3.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-20 20:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-20 20:51 [RFC][PATCH 00/18] Increase resolution of load weights Nikhil Rao
2011-04-20 20:51 ` [RFC][Patch 01/18] sched: introduce SCHED_POWER_SCALE to scale cpu_power calculations Nikhil Rao
2011-04-20 20:51 ` [RFC][Patch 02/18] sched: increase SCHED_LOAD_SCALE resolution Nikhil Rao
2011-04-28 9:54 ` Nikunj A. Dadhania
2011-04-28 17:11 ` Nikhil Rao
2011-04-20 20:51 ` [RFC][Patch 03/18] sched: use u64 for load_weight fields Nikhil Rao
2011-04-20 20:51 ` [RFC][Patch 04/18] sched: update cpu_load to be u64 Nikhil Rao
2011-04-20 20:51 ` [RFC][Patch 05/18] sched: update this_cpu_load() to return u64 value Nikhil Rao
2011-04-20 20:51 ` [RFC][Patch 06/18] sched: update source_load(), target_load() and weighted_cpuload() to use u64 Nikhil Rao
2011-04-20 20:51 ` [RFC][Patch 07/18] sched: update find_idlest_cpu() to use u64 for load Nikhil Rao
2011-04-20 20:51 ` [RFC][Patch 08/18] sched: update find_idlest_group() to use u64 Nikhil Rao
2011-04-20 20:51 ` [RFC][Patch 09/18] sched: update division in cpu_avg_load_per_task to use div_u64 Nikhil Rao
2011-04-20 20:51 ` [RFC][Patch 10/18] sched: update wake_affine path to use u64, s64 for weights Nikhil Rao
2011-04-20 20:51 ` Nikhil Rao [this message]
2011-04-20 20:51 ` [RFC][Patch 12/18] sched: Update update_sd_lb_stats() to use u64 Nikhil Rao
2011-04-20 20:51 ` [RFC][Patch 13/18] sched: update f_b_g() to use u64 for weights Nikhil Rao
2011-04-20 20:51 ` [RFC][Patch 14/18] sched: change type of imbalance to be u64 Nikhil Rao
2011-04-20 20:51 ` [RFC][Patch 15/18] sched: update h_load to use u64 Nikhil Rao
2011-04-20 20:51 ` [RFC][Patch 16/18] sched: update move_task() and helper functions to use u64 for weights Nikhil Rao
2011-04-20 20:51 ` [RFC][Patch 17/18] sched: update f_b_q() to use u64 for weighted cpuload Nikhil Rao
2011-04-20 20:51 ` [RFC][Patch 18/18] sched: update shares distribution to use u64 Nikhil Rao
2011-04-21 6:16 ` [RFC][PATCH 00/18] Increase resolution of load weights Ingo Molnar
2011-04-21 16:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-26 16:11 ` Nikhil Rao
2011-04-21 16:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-28 7:07 ` Nikunj A. Dadhania
2011-04-28 11:48 ` Nikunj A. Dadhania
2011-04-28 12:12 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2011-04-28 18:33 ` Nikhil Rao
2011-04-28 18:51 ` Paul Turner
2011-04-28 18:53 ` Paul Turner
2011-04-28 21:27 ` Nikhil Rao
2011-04-29 16:55 ` Paul Turner
2011-04-28 18:20 ` Nikhil Rao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1303332697-16426-12-git-send-email-ncrao@google.com \
--to=ncrao@google.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox