From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756556Ab1DZOX0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Apr 2011 10:23:26 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:41675 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756514Ab1DZOXZ convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Apr 2011 10:23:25 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] Swap-over-NBD without deadlocking From: Peter Zijlstra To: Mel Gorman Cc: Linux-MM , Linux-Netdev , LKML , David Miller , Neil Brown In-Reply-To: <1303803414-5937-1-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de> References: <1303803414-5937-1-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 16:23:05 +0200 Message-ID: <1303827785.20212.266.camel@twins> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 08:36 +0100, Mel Gorman wrote: > Comments? Last time I brought up the whole swap over network bits I was pointed towards the generic skb recycling work: http://lwn.net/Articles/332037/ as a means to pre-allocate memory, and it was suggested to simply pin the few route-cache entries required to route these packets and dis-allow swap packets to be fragmented (these last two avoid lots of funny allocation cases in the network stack).