The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jesse Gross <jesse@nicira.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH] flex_array: Avoid divisions when accessing elements.
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 13:41:41 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1303850501-16249-1-git-send-email-jesse@nicira.com> (raw)

On most architectures division is an expensive operation and
accessing an element currently requires four of them.  This
performance penalty effectively precludes flex arrays from
being used on any kind of fast path.  However, two of these
divisions can be handled at creation time and the others can
be replaced by a reciprocal divide, completely avoiding real
divisions on access.

Signed-off-by: Jesse Gross <jesse@nicira.com>
CC: Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
CC: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
---
 include/linux/flex_array.h |    2 ++
 lib/flex_array.c           |   21 ++++++++++++---------
 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/flex_array.h b/include/linux/flex_array.h
index 70e4efa..9641a8f 100644
--- a/include/linux/flex_array.h
+++ b/include/linux/flex_array.h
@@ -21,6 +21,8 @@ struct flex_array {
 		struct {
 			int element_size;
 			int total_nr_elements;
+			int elems_per_part;
+			u32 reciprocal_elems;
 			struct flex_array_part *parts[];
 		};
 		/*
diff --git a/lib/flex_array.c b/lib/flex_array.c
index c0ea40b..17ed599 100644
--- a/lib/flex_array.c
+++ b/lib/flex_array.c
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
 #include <linux/slab.h>
 #include <linux/stddef.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/reciprocal_div.h>
 
 struct flex_array_part {
 	char elements[FLEX_ARRAY_PART_SIZE];
@@ -88,8 +89,8 @@ struct flex_array *flex_array_alloc(int element_size, unsigned int total,
 					gfp_t flags)
 {
 	struct flex_array *ret;
-	int max_size = FLEX_ARRAY_NR_BASE_PTRS *
-				FLEX_ARRAY_ELEMENTS_PER_PART(element_size);
+	int elems_per_part = FLEX_ARRAY_ELEMENTS_PER_PART(element_size);
+	int max_size = FLEX_ARRAY_NR_BASE_PTRS * elems_per_part;
 
 	/* max_size will end up 0 if element_size > PAGE_SIZE */
 	if (total > max_size)
@@ -99,6 +100,8 @@ struct flex_array *flex_array_alloc(int element_size, unsigned int total,
 		return NULL;
 	ret->element_size = element_size;
 	ret->total_nr_elements = total;
+	ret->elems_per_part = elems_per_part;
+	ret->reciprocal_elems = reciprocal_value(elems_per_part);
 	if (elements_fit_in_base(ret) && !(flags & __GFP_ZERO))
 		memset(&ret->parts[0], FLEX_ARRAY_FREE,
 						FLEX_ARRAY_BASE_BYTES_LEFT);
@@ -109,7 +112,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(flex_array_alloc);
 static int fa_element_to_part_nr(struct flex_array *fa,
 					unsigned int element_nr)
 {
-	return element_nr / FLEX_ARRAY_ELEMENTS_PER_PART(fa->element_size);
+	return reciprocal_divide(element_nr, fa->reciprocal_elems);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -138,12 +141,12 @@ void flex_array_free(struct flex_array *fa)
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(flex_array_free);
 
 static unsigned int index_inside_part(struct flex_array *fa,
-					unsigned int element_nr)
+					unsigned int element_nr,
+					unsigned int part_nr)
 {
 	unsigned int part_offset;
 
-	part_offset = element_nr %
-				FLEX_ARRAY_ELEMENTS_PER_PART(fa->element_size);
+	part_offset = element_nr - part_nr * fa->elems_per_part;
 	return part_offset * fa->element_size;
 }
 
@@ -196,7 +199,7 @@ int flex_array_put(struct flex_array *fa, unsigned int element_nr, void *src,
 		if (!part)
 			return -ENOMEM;
 	}
-	dst = &part->elements[index_inside_part(fa, element_nr)];
+	dst = &part->elements[index_inside_part(fa, element_nr, part_nr)];
 	memcpy(dst, src, fa->element_size);
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -224,7 +227,7 @@ int flex_array_clear(struct flex_array *fa, unsigned int element_nr)
 		if (!part)
 			return -EINVAL;
 	}
-	dst = &part->elements[index_inside_part(fa, element_nr)];
+	dst = &part->elements[index_inside_part(fa, element_nr, part_nr)];
 	memset(dst, FLEX_ARRAY_FREE, fa->element_size);
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -293,7 +296,7 @@ void *flex_array_get(struct flex_array *fa, unsigned int element_nr)
 		if (!part)
 			return NULL;
 	}
-	return &part->elements[index_inside_part(fa, element_nr)];
+	return &part->elements[index_inside_part(fa, element_nr, part_nr)];
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(flex_array_get);
 
-- 
1.7.1


             reply	other threads:[~2011-04-26 20:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-04-26 20:41 Jesse Gross [this message]
2011-04-27 16:13 ` [PATCH] flex_array: Avoid divisions when accessing elements Dave Hansen
2011-04-29  1:48   ` Jesse Gross
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-05-02 17:26 [PATCH] flex_array: avoid " Eric Paris
2011-05-02 17:36 ` Dave Hansen
2011-05-02 20:23   ` Jesse Gross

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1303850501-16249-1-git-send-email-jesse@nicira.com \
    --to=jesse@nicira.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox