[PATCH 0/2] perf misc cleanup

[PATCH 0/2] perf misc cleanup

[Lin Ming]

Hi, Arnaldo

Could you take below 2 one-line patches?

[RESEND PATCH 1/2] perf probe: Fix the missed parameter initialization
       [PATCH 2/2] perf annotate: Remove duplicate header file

Thanks,
Lin Ming

[RESEND PATCH 1/2] perf probe: Fix the missed parameter initialization

[Lin Ming]

pubname_callback_param::found should be initialized to 0 in fastpath lookup.

Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
---
 tools/perf/util/probe-finder.c |    1 +
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/util/probe-finder.c b/tools/perf/util/probe-finder.c
index a7c7145..3b9d0b8 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/probe-finder.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/probe-finder.c
@@ -1538,6 +1538,7 @@ static int find_probes(int fd, struct probe_finder *pf)
 			.file	  = pp->file,
 			.cu_die	  = &pf->cu_die,
 			.sp_die	  = &pf->sp_die,
+			.found	  = 0,
 		};
 		struct dwarf_callback_param probe_param = {
 			.data = pf,
-- 
1.7.4.4

[PATCH 2/2] perf annotate: Remove duplicate header file

[Lin Ming]

annotate.h was included twice, remove one.

Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
---
 tools/perf/util/ui/browsers/annotate.c |    1 -
 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/util/ui/browsers/annotate.c b/tools/perf/util/ui/browsers/annotate.c
index 15633d6..4bb69e8 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/ui/browsers/annotate.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/ui/browsers/annotate.c
@@ -1,7 +1,6 @@
 #include "../browser.h"
 #include "../helpline.h"
 #include "../libslang.h"
-#include "../../annotate.h"
 #include "../../hist.h"
 #include "../../sort.h"
 #include "../../symbol.h"
-- 
1.7.4.4

Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/2] perf probe: Fix the missed parameter initialization

[Ingo Molnar]

* Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com> wrote:

> pubname_callback_param::found should be initialized to 0 in fastpath lookup.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
> ---
>  tools/perf/util/probe-finder.c |    1 +
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/probe-finder.c b/tools/perf/util/probe-finder.c
> index a7c7145..3b9d0b8 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/probe-finder.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/probe-finder.c
> @@ -1538,6 +1538,7 @@ static int find_probes(int fd, struct probe_finder *pf)
>  			.file	  = pp->file,
>  			.cu_die	  = &pf->cu_die,
>  			.sp_die	  = &pf->sp_die,
> +			.found	  = 0,

Hm, why is this a 'misc cleanup'? If this field is uninitialized (it does 
appear so) and we rely on the field then right now this is a bug and the fix 
should be pushed to perf/urgent.

Thanks,

	Ingo

Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/2] perf probe: Fix the missed parameter initialization

[Lin Ming]

On Fri, 2011-04-29 at 17:44 +0800, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com> wrote:
> 
> > pubname_callback_param::found should be initialized to 0 in fastpath lookup.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  tools/perf/util/probe-finder.c |    1 +
> >  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/probe-finder.c b/tools/perf/util/probe-finder.c
> > index a7c7145..3b9d0b8 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/util/probe-finder.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/util/probe-finder.c
> > @@ -1538,6 +1538,7 @@ static int find_probes(int fd, struct probe_finder *pf)
> >  			.file	  = pp->file,
> >  			.cu_die	  = &pf->cu_die,
> >  			.sp_die	  = &pf->sp_die,
> > +			.found	  = 0,
> 
> Hm, why is this a 'misc cleanup'? If this field is uninitialized (it does 

I should call it 'misc cleanup and fix'.

> appear so) and we rely on the field then right now this is a bug and the fix 
> should be pushed to perf/urgent.

Indeed.

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 	Ingo

Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/2] perf probe: Fix the missed parameter initialization

[Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo]

Em Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 08:41:57AM +0000, Lin Ming escreveu:
> pubname_callback_param::found should be initialized to 0 in fastpath lookup.


Is this really needed? Or is this just to stress it, for documentational
purposes?
 
> Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
> ---
>  tools/perf/util/probe-finder.c |    1 +
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/probe-finder.c b/tools/perf/util/probe-finder.c
> index a7c7145..3b9d0b8 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/probe-finder.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/probe-finder.c
> @@ -1538,6 +1538,7 @@ static int find_probes(int fd, struct probe_finder *pf)
>  			.file	  = pp->file,
>  			.cu_die	  = &pf->cu_die,
>  			.sp_die	  = &pf->sp_die,
> +			.found	  = 0,
>  		};
>  		struct dwarf_callback_param probe_param = {
>  			.data = pf,
> -- 
> 1.7.4.4

Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/2] perf probe: Fix the missed parameter initialization

[Lin Ming]

On Sat, 2011-04-30 at 01:33 +0800, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 08:41:57AM +0000, Lin Ming escreveu:
> > pubname_callback_param::found should be initialized to 0 in fastpath lookup.
> 
> 
> Is this really needed? Or is this just to stress it, for documentational
> purposes?

Yes, this is really needed.

It should be initialized to 0, and pubname_search_cb will set it to 1 if
the function is found.

>  
> > Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  tools/perf/util/probe-finder.c |    1 +
> >  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/probe-finder.c b/tools/perf/util/probe-finder.c
> > index a7c7145..3b9d0b8 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/util/probe-finder.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/util/probe-finder.c
> > @@ -1538,6 +1538,7 @@ static int find_probes(int fd, struct probe_finder *pf)
> >  			.file	  = pp->file,
> >  			.cu_die	  = &pf->cu_die,
> >  			.sp_die	  = &pf->sp_die,
> > +			.found	  = 0,
> >  		};
> >  		struct dwarf_callback_param probe_param = {
> >  			.data = pf,
> > -- 
> > 1.7.4.4

Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/2] perf probe: Fix the missed parameter initialization

[Lin Ming]

On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-04-30 at 01:33 +0800, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>> Em Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 08:41:57AM +0000, Lin Ming escreveu:
>> > pubname_callback_param::found should be initialized to 0 in fastpath lookup.
>>
>>
>> Is this really needed? Or is this just to stress it, for documentational
>> purposes?
>
> Yes, this is really needed.
>
> It should be initialized to 0, and pubname_search_cb will set it to 1 if
> the function is found.

ping ...

-- 
Lin Ming -- Intel Open Source Technology Center

[tip:perf/core] perf probe: Fix the missed parameter initialization

[tip-bot for Lin Ming]

Commit-ID:  2b348a77981227c6b64fb9cf19f7c711a6806bc9
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/2b348a77981227c6b64fb9cf19f7c711a6806bc9
Author:     Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
AuthorDate: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 08:41:57 +0000
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
CommitDate: Tue, 10 May 2011 17:06:23 +0200

perf probe: Fix the missed parameter initialization

pubname_callback_param::found should be initialized to 0 in
fastpath lookup, the structure is on the stack and
uninitialized otherwise.

Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1304066518-30420-2-git-send-email-ming.m.lin@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
---
 tools/perf/util/probe-finder.c |    1 +
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/util/probe-finder.c b/tools/perf/util/probe-finder.c
index a7c7145..3b9d0b8 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/probe-finder.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/probe-finder.c
@@ -1538,6 +1538,7 @@ static int find_probes(int fd, struct probe_finder *pf)
 			.file	  = pp->file,
 			.cu_die	  = &pf->cu_die,
 			.sp_die	  = &pf->sp_die,
+			.found	  = 0,
 		};
 		struct dwarf_callback_param probe_param = {
 			.data = pf,