public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: mingo@redhat.com, yinghai@kernel.org, rientjes@google.com,
	tglx@linutronix.de, hpa@zytor.com, x86@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 15/25] x86-32, NUMA: Update numaq to use new NUMA init protocol
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 17:28:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1304090924-8197-16-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1304090924-8197-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>

Update numaq such that it calls numa_add_memblk() and sets
numa_nodes_parsed instead of directly diddling with NUMA states.  The
original get_memcfg_numaq() is renamed to numaq_numa_init() and new
get_memcfg_numaq() is created in numa_32.c.

The shim numa_add_memblk() implementation handles node_start/end_pfn[]
and node_set_online() for nodes with memory.  The new
get_memcfg_numaq() exactly the same with get_memcfg_from_srat() other
than calling the numaq init function.  Things get_memcfgs_numaq() do
are not strictly necessary for numaq but added for consistency and to
help unifying NUMA init handling.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/numaq.h    |    7 +------
 arch/x86/kernel/apic/numaq_32.c |   28 ++++++++++------------------
 arch/x86/mm/numa_32.c           |   23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/numaq.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/numaq.h
index 37c5165..c3b3c32 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/numaq.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/numaq.h
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_NUMAQ
 
 extern int found_numaq;
-extern int get_memcfg_numaq(void);
+extern int numaq_numa_init(void);
 extern int pci_numaq_init(void);
 
 extern void *xquad_portio;
@@ -166,11 +166,6 @@ struct sys_cfg_data {
 
 void numaq_tsc_disable(void);
 
-#else
-static inline int get_memcfg_numaq(void)
-{
-	return 0;
-}
 #endif /* CONFIG_X86_NUMAQ */
 #endif /* _ASM_X86_NUMAQ_H */
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/numaq_32.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/numaq_32.c
index 41b8b29..30f1331 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/numaq_32.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/numaq_32.c
@@ -48,8 +48,6 @@
 #include <asm/e820.h>
 #include <asm/ipi.h>
 
-#define	MB_TO_PAGES(addr)		((addr) << (20 - PAGE_SHIFT))
-
 int found_numaq;
 
 /*
@@ -79,25 +77,20 @@ int					quad_local_to_mp_bus_id[NR_CPUS/4][4];
 static inline void numaq_register_node(int node, struct sys_cfg_data *scd)
 {
 	struct eachquadmem *eq = scd->eq + node;
+	u64 start = (u64)(eq->hi_shrd_mem_start - eq->priv_mem_size) << 20;
+	u64 end = (u64)(eq->hi_shrd_mem_start + eq->hi_shrd_mem_size) << 20;
+	int ret;
 
-	node_set_online(node);
-
-	/* Convert to pages */
-	node_start_pfn[node] =
-		 MB_TO_PAGES(eq->hi_shrd_mem_start - eq->priv_mem_size);
-
-	node_end_pfn[node] =
-		 MB_TO_PAGES(eq->hi_shrd_mem_start + eq->hi_shrd_mem_size);
-
-	memblock_x86_register_active_regions(node, node_start_pfn[node],
-						node_end_pfn[node]);
+	node_set(node, numa_nodes_parsed);
+	ret = numa_add_memblk(node, start, end);
+	BUG_ON(ret < 0);
 }
 
 /*
  * Function: smp_dump_qct()
  *
  * Description: gets memory layout from the quad config table.  This
- * function also updates node_online_map with the nodes (quads) present.
+ * function also updates numa_nodes_parsed with the nodes (quads) present.
  */
 static void __init smp_dump_qct(void)
 {
@@ -106,7 +99,6 @@ static void __init smp_dump_qct(void)
 
 	scd = (void *)__va(SYS_CFG_DATA_PRIV_ADDR);
 
-	nodes_clear(node_online_map);
 	for_each_node(node) {
 		if (scd->quads_present31_0 & (1 << node))
 			numaq_register_node(node, scd);
@@ -276,14 +268,14 @@ static __init void early_check_numaq(void)
 	}
 }
 
-int __init get_memcfg_numaq(void)
+int __init numaq_numa_init(void)
 {
 	early_check_numaq();
 	if (!found_numaq)
-		return 0;
+		return -ENOENT;
 	smp_dump_qct();
 
-	return 1;
+	return 0;
 }
 
 #define NUMAQ_APIC_DFR_VALUE	(APIC_DFR_CLUSTER)
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa_32.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa_32.c
index 8641239..14135e5 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/numa_32.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa_32.c
@@ -332,6 +332,29 @@ static __init void init_alloc_remap(int nid)
 	       nid, node_pa, node_pa + size, remap_va, remap_va + size);
 }
 
+static int get_memcfg_numaq(void)
+{
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_NUMAQ
+	int nid;
+
+	if (numa_off)
+		return 0;
+
+	if (numaq_numa_init() < 0) {
+		nodes_clear(numa_nodes_parsed);
+		remove_all_active_ranges();
+		return 0;
+	}
+
+	for_each_node_mask(nid, numa_nodes_parsed)
+		node_set_online(nid);
+	sort_node_map();
+	return 1;
+#else
+	return 0;
+#endif
+}
+
 static int get_memcfg_from_srat(void)
 {
 #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA
-- 
1.7.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-04-29 15:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-04-29 15:28 [PATCHSET tip] x86, NUMA: Unify 32 and 64bit NUMA initialization Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 01/25] x86-64, NUMA: Simplify hotadd memory handling Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 02/25] x86-64, NUMA: trivial cleanups for setup_node_bootmem() Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 03/25] x86-64, NUMA: simplify nodedata allocation Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 17:23   ` Yinghai Lu
2011-04-30 12:02     ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 04/25] x86-32, NUMA: Automatically set apicid -> node in setup_local_APIC() Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 05/25] x86, NUMA: Unify 32/64bit numa_cpu_node() implementation Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 06/25] x86-32, NUMA: Make apic->x86_32_numa_cpu_node() optional Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 07/25] x86-32, NUMA: use sparse_memory_present_with_active_regions() Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 08/25] x86, NUMA: trivial cleanups Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 17:25   ` Yinghai Lu
2011-04-30 12:03     ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-30 16:24       ` Yinghai Lu
2011-04-30 18:00         ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-30 23:10           ` Yinghai Lu
2011-04-30 23:11           ` [PATCH] x86, numa: Rename setup_node_bootmem to setup_node_data Yinghai Lu
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 09/25] x86, NUMA: rename srat_64.c to srat.c Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 10/25] x86, NUMA: make srat.c 32bit safe Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 11/25] x86-32, NUMA: Move get_memcfg_numa() into numa_32.c Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 12/25] x86, NUMA: Move numa_nodes_parsed to numa.[hc] Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 13/25] x86-32, NUMA: implement temporary NUMA init shims Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 14/25] x86-32, NUMA: Replace srat_32.c with srat.c Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 16/25] x86, NUMA: Move NUMA init logic from numa_64.c to numa.c Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 17/25] x86, NUMA: Enable build of generic NUMA init code on 32bit Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 18/25] x86, NUMA: Remove long 64bit assumption from numa.c Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 19/25] x86-32, NUMA: Add @start and @end to init_alloc_remap() Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 20/25] x86, NUMA: Initialize and use remap allocator from setup_node_bootmem() Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 21/25] x86, NUMA: Make 32bit use common NUMA init path Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 22/25] x86, NUMA: Make numa_init_array() static Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 23/25] x86, NUMA: Rename amdtopology_64.c to amdtopology.c Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 24/25] x86, NUMA: Enable CONFIG_AMD_NUMA on 32bit too Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 25/25] x86, NUMA: Enable emulation " Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 18:15 ` [PATCHSET tip] x86, NUMA: Unify 32 and 64bit NUMA initialization Ingo Molnar
2011-04-29 20:14 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-04-30 12:17   ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-30 12:33     ` [PATCH] x86, NUMA: Fix empty memblk detection in numa_cleanup_meminfo() Tejun Heo
2011-04-30 12:35       ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-01  0:43       ` Yinghai Lu
2011-05-01 10:20         ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-01 19:44           ` [PATCH] x86, numa: Trim numa meminfo with max_pfn in separated loop Yinghai Lu
2011-04-30 16:31     ` [PATCHSET tip] x86, NUMA: Unify 32 and 64bit NUMA initialization Yinghai Lu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1304090924-8197-16-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox