public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: mingo@redhat.com, yinghai@kernel.org, rientjes@google.com,
	tglx@linutronix.de, hpa@zytor.com, x86@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 20/25] x86, NUMA: Initialize and use remap allocator from setup_node_bootmem()
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 17:28:39 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1304090924-8197-21-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1304090924-8197-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>

setup_node_bootmem() is taken from 64bit and doesn't use remap
allocator.  It's about to be shared with 32bit so add support for it.
If NODE_DATA is remapped, it's noted in the debug message and node
locality check is skipped as the __pa() of the remapped address
doesn't reflect the actual physical address.

On 64bit, remap allocator becomes noop and doesn't affect the
behavior.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
---
 arch/x86/mm/numa.c          |   41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
 arch/x86/mm/numa_32.c       |    2 +-
 arch/x86/mm/numa_internal.h |    6 ++++++
 3 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
index b2fca54..a37b382 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
@@ -197,7 +197,9 @@ static void __init setup_node_bootmem(int nid, u64 start, u64 end)
 	const u64 nd_low = PFN_PHYS(MAX_DMA_PFN);
 	const u64 nd_high = PFN_PHYS(max_pfn_mapped);
 	const size_t nd_size = roundup(sizeof(pg_data_t), PAGE_SIZE);
+	bool remapped = false;
 	u64 nd_pa;
+	void *nd;
 	int tnid;
 
 	/*
@@ -207,34 +209,45 @@ static void __init setup_node_bootmem(int nid, u64 start, u64 end)
 	if (end && (end - start) < NODE_MIN_SIZE)
 		return;
 
+	/* initialize remap allocator before aligning to ZONE_ALIGN */
+	init_alloc_remap(nid, start, end);
+
 	start = roundup(start, ZONE_ALIGN);
 
 	printk(KERN_INFO "Initmem setup node %d %016Lx-%016Lx\n",
 	       nid, start, end);
 
 	/*
-	 * Try to allocate node data on local node and then fall back to
-	 * all nodes.  Never allocate in DMA zone.
+	 * Allocate node data.  Try remap allocator first, node-local
+	 * memory and then any node.  Never allocate in DMA zone.
 	 */
-	nd_pa = memblock_x86_find_in_range_node(nid, nd_low, nd_high,
+	nd = alloc_remap(nid, nd_size);
+	if (nd) {
+		nd_pa = __pa(nd);
+		remapped = true;
+	} else {
+		nd_pa = memblock_x86_find_in_range_node(nid, nd_low, nd_high,
 						nd_size, SMP_CACHE_BYTES);
-	if (nd_pa == MEMBLOCK_ERROR)
-		nd_pa = memblock_find_in_range(nd_low, nd_high,
-					       nd_size, SMP_CACHE_BYTES);
-	if (nd_pa == MEMBLOCK_ERROR) {
-		pr_err("Cannot find %zu bytes in node %d\n", nd_size, nid);
-		return;
+		if (nd_pa == MEMBLOCK_ERROR)
+			nd_pa = memblock_find_in_range(nd_low, nd_high,
+						nd_size, SMP_CACHE_BYTES);
+		if (nd_pa == MEMBLOCK_ERROR) {
+			pr_err("Cannot find %zu bytes in node %d\n",
+			       nd_size, nid);
+			return;
+		}
+		memblock_x86_reserve_range(nd_pa, nd_pa + nd_size, "NODE_DATA");
+		nd = __va(nd_pa);
 	}
-	memblock_x86_reserve_range(nd_pa, nd_pa + nd_size, "NODE_DATA");
 
 	/* report and initialize */
-	printk(KERN_INFO "  NODE_DATA [%016Lx - %016Lx]\n",
-	       nd_pa, nd_pa + nd_size - 1);
+	printk(KERN_INFO "  NODE_DATA [%016Lx - %016Lx]%s\n",
+	       nd_pa, nd_pa + nd_size - 1, remapped ? " (remapped)" : "");
 	tnid = early_pfn_to_nid(nd_pa >> PAGE_SHIFT);
-	if (tnid != nid)
+	if (!remapped && tnid != nid)
 		printk(KERN_INFO "    NODE_DATA(%d) on node %d\n", nid, tnid);
 
-	node_data[nid] = __va(nd_pa);
+	node_data[nid] = nd;
 	memset(NODE_DATA(nid), 0, sizeof(pg_data_t));
 	NODE_DATA(nid)->node_id = nid;
 	NODE_DATA(nid)->node_start_pfn = start >> PAGE_SHIFT;
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa_32.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa_32.c
index 9008632..fbd558f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/numa_32.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa_32.c
@@ -265,7 +265,7 @@ void resume_map_numa_kva(pgd_t *pgd_base)
  * opportunistically and the callers will fall back to other memory
  * allocation mechanisms on failure.
  */
-static __init void init_alloc_remap(int nid, u64 start, u64 end)
+void __init init_alloc_remap(int nid, u64 start, u64 end)
 {
 	unsigned long start_pfn = start >> PAGE_SHIFT;
 	unsigned long end_pfn = end >> PAGE_SHIFT;
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa_internal.h b/arch/x86/mm/numa_internal.h
index ad86ec9..7178c3a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/numa_internal.h
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa_internal.h
@@ -21,6 +21,12 @@ void __init numa_reset_distance(void);
 
 void __init x86_numa_init(void);
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
+static inline void init_alloc_remap(int nid, u64 start, u64 end)	{ }
+#else
+void __init init_alloc_remap(int nid, u64 start, u64 end);
+#endif
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_EMU
 void __init numa_emulation(struct numa_meminfo *numa_meminfo,
 			   int numa_dist_cnt);
-- 
1.7.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-04-29 15:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-04-29 15:28 [PATCHSET tip] x86, NUMA: Unify 32 and 64bit NUMA initialization Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 01/25] x86-64, NUMA: Simplify hotadd memory handling Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 02/25] x86-64, NUMA: trivial cleanups for setup_node_bootmem() Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 03/25] x86-64, NUMA: simplify nodedata allocation Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 17:23   ` Yinghai Lu
2011-04-30 12:02     ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 04/25] x86-32, NUMA: Automatically set apicid -> node in setup_local_APIC() Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 05/25] x86, NUMA: Unify 32/64bit numa_cpu_node() implementation Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 06/25] x86-32, NUMA: Make apic->x86_32_numa_cpu_node() optional Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 07/25] x86-32, NUMA: use sparse_memory_present_with_active_regions() Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 08/25] x86, NUMA: trivial cleanups Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 17:25   ` Yinghai Lu
2011-04-30 12:03     ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-30 16:24       ` Yinghai Lu
2011-04-30 18:00         ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-30 23:10           ` Yinghai Lu
2011-04-30 23:11           ` [PATCH] x86, numa: Rename setup_node_bootmem to setup_node_data Yinghai Lu
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 09/25] x86, NUMA: rename srat_64.c to srat.c Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 10/25] x86, NUMA: make srat.c 32bit safe Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 11/25] x86-32, NUMA: Move get_memcfg_numa() into numa_32.c Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 12/25] x86, NUMA: Move numa_nodes_parsed to numa.[hc] Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 13/25] x86-32, NUMA: implement temporary NUMA init shims Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 14/25] x86-32, NUMA: Replace srat_32.c with srat.c Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 15/25] x86-32, NUMA: Update numaq to use new NUMA init protocol Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 16/25] x86, NUMA: Move NUMA init logic from numa_64.c to numa.c Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 17/25] x86, NUMA: Enable build of generic NUMA init code on 32bit Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 18/25] x86, NUMA: Remove long 64bit assumption from numa.c Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 19/25] x86-32, NUMA: Add @start and @end to init_alloc_remap() Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 21/25] x86, NUMA: Make 32bit use common NUMA init path Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 22/25] x86, NUMA: Make numa_init_array() static Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 23/25] x86, NUMA: Rename amdtopology_64.c to amdtopology.c Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 24/25] x86, NUMA: Enable CONFIG_AMD_NUMA on 32bit too Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 25/25] x86, NUMA: Enable emulation " Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 18:15 ` [PATCHSET tip] x86, NUMA: Unify 32 and 64bit NUMA initialization Ingo Molnar
2011-04-29 20:14 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-04-30 12:17   ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-30 12:33     ` [PATCH] x86, NUMA: Fix empty memblk detection in numa_cleanup_meminfo() Tejun Heo
2011-04-30 12:35       ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-01  0:43       ` Yinghai Lu
2011-05-01 10:20         ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-01 19:44           ` [PATCH] x86, numa: Trim numa meminfo with max_pfn in separated loop Yinghai Lu
2011-04-30 16:31     ` [PATCHSET tip] x86, NUMA: Unify 32 and 64bit NUMA initialization Yinghai Lu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1304090924-8197-21-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox