public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: mingo@redhat.com, yinghai@kernel.org, rientjes@google.com,
	tglx@linutronix.de, hpa@zytor.com, x86@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 03/25] x86-64, NUMA: simplify nodedata allocation
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 17:28:22 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1304090924-8197-4-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1304090924-8197-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>

With top-down memblock allocation, the allocation range limits in
ealry_node_mem() can be simplified - try node-local first, then any
node but in any case don't allocate below DMA limit.

Remove early_node_mem() and implement simplified allocation directly
in setup_node_bootmem().

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
---
 arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c |   53 +++++++++++++++---------------------------------
 1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c
index 5e0dfc5..59d8a1c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c
@@ -37,38 +37,6 @@ __initdata
 static int numa_distance_cnt;
 static u8 *numa_distance;
 
-static void * __init early_node_mem(int nodeid, unsigned long start,
-				    unsigned long end, unsigned long size,
-				    unsigned long align)
-{
-	unsigned long mem;
-
-	/*
-	 * put it on high as possible
-	 * something will go with NODE_DATA
-	 */
-	if (start < (MAX_DMA_PFN<<PAGE_SHIFT))
-		start = MAX_DMA_PFN<<PAGE_SHIFT;
-	if (start < (MAX_DMA32_PFN<<PAGE_SHIFT) &&
-	    end > (MAX_DMA32_PFN<<PAGE_SHIFT))
-		start = MAX_DMA32_PFN<<PAGE_SHIFT;
-	mem = memblock_x86_find_in_range_node(nodeid, start, end, size, align);
-	if (mem != MEMBLOCK_ERROR)
-		return __va(mem);
-
-	/* extend the search scope */
-	end = max_pfn_mapped << PAGE_SHIFT;
-	start = MAX_DMA_PFN << PAGE_SHIFT;
-	mem = memblock_find_in_range(start, end, size, align);
-	if (mem != MEMBLOCK_ERROR)
-		return __va(mem);
-
-	printk(KERN_ERR "Cannot find %lu bytes in node %d\n",
-		       size, nodeid);
-
-	return NULL;
-}
-
 static int __init numa_add_memblk_to(int nid, u64 start, u64 end,
 				     struct numa_meminfo *mi)
 {
@@ -130,6 +98,8 @@ int __init numa_add_memblk(int nid, u64 start, u64 end)
 void __init
 setup_node_bootmem(int nid, unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
 {
+	const u64 nd_low = (u64)MAX_DMA_PFN << PAGE_SHIFT;
+	const u64 nd_high = (u64)max_pfn_mapped << PAGE_SHIFT;
 	const size_t nd_size = roundup(sizeof(pg_data_t), PAGE_SIZE);
 	unsigned long nd_pa;
 	int tnid;
@@ -146,18 +116,29 @@ setup_node_bootmem(int nid, unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
 	printk(KERN_INFO "Initmem setup node %d %016lx-%016lx\n",
 	       nid, start, end);
 
-	node_data[nid] = early_node_mem(nid, start, end, nd_size,
-					SMP_CACHE_BYTES);
-	if (node_data[nid] == NULL)
+	/*
+	 * Try to allocate node data on local node and then fall back to
+	 * all nodes.  Never allocate in DMA zone.
+	 */
+	nd_pa = memblock_x86_find_in_range_node(nid, nd_low, nd_high,
+						nd_size, SMP_CACHE_BYTES);
+	if (nd_pa == MEMBLOCK_ERROR)
+		nd_pa = memblock_find_in_range(nd_low, nd_high,
+					       nd_size, SMP_CACHE_BYTES);
+	if (nd_pa == MEMBLOCK_ERROR) {
+		pr_err("Cannot find %lu bytes in node %d\n", nd_size, nid);
 		return;
-	nd_pa = __pa(node_data[nid]);
+	}
 	memblock_x86_reserve_range(nd_pa, nd_pa + nd_size, "NODE_DATA");
+
+	/* report and initialize */
 	printk(KERN_INFO "  NODE_DATA [%016lx - %016lx]\n",
 	       nd_pa, nd_pa + nd_size - 1);
 	tnid = early_pfn_to_nid(nd_pa >> PAGE_SHIFT);
 	if (tnid != nid)
 		printk(KERN_INFO "    NODE_DATA(%d) on node %d\n", nid, tnid);
 
+	node_data[nid] = __va(nd_pa);
 	memset(NODE_DATA(nid), 0, sizeof(pg_data_t));
 	NODE_DATA(nid)->node_id = nid;
 	NODE_DATA(nid)->node_start_pfn = start >> PAGE_SHIFT;
-- 
1.7.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-04-29 15:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-04-29 15:28 [PATCHSET tip] x86, NUMA: Unify 32 and 64bit NUMA initialization Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 01/25] x86-64, NUMA: Simplify hotadd memory handling Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 02/25] x86-64, NUMA: trivial cleanups for setup_node_bootmem() Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2011-04-29 17:23   ` [PATCH 03/25] x86-64, NUMA: simplify nodedata allocation Yinghai Lu
2011-04-30 12:02     ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 04/25] x86-32, NUMA: Automatically set apicid -> node in setup_local_APIC() Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 05/25] x86, NUMA: Unify 32/64bit numa_cpu_node() implementation Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 06/25] x86-32, NUMA: Make apic->x86_32_numa_cpu_node() optional Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 07/25] x86-32, NUMA: use sparse_memory_present_with_active_regions() Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 08/25] x86, NUMA: trivial cleanups Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 17:25   ` Yinghai Lu
2011-04-30 12:03     ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-30 16:24       ` Yinghai Lu
2011-04-30 18:00         ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-30 23:10           ` Yinghai Lu
2011-04-30 23:11           ` [PATCH] x86, numa: Rename setup_node_bootmem to setup_node_data Yinghai Lu
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 09/25] x86, NUMA: rename srat_64.c to srat.c Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 10/25] x86, NUMA: make srat.c 32bit safe Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 11/25] x86-32, NUMA: Move get_memcfg_numa() into numa_32.c Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 12/25] x86, NUMA: Move numa_nodes_parsed to numa.[hc] Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 13/25] x86-32, NUMA: implement temporary NUMA init shims Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 14/25] x86-32, NUMA: Replace srat_32.c with srat.c Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 15/25] x86-32, NUMA: Update numaq to use new NUMA init protocol Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 16/25] x86, NUMA: Move NUMA init logic from numa_64.c to numa.c Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 17/25] x86, NUMA: Enable build of generic NUMA init code on 32bit Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 18/25] x86, NUMA: Remove long 64bit assumption from numa.c Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 19/25] x86-32, NUMA: Add @start and @end to init_alloc_remap() Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 20/25] x86, NUMA: Initialize and use remap allocator from setup_node_bootmem() Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 21/25] x86, NUMA: Make 32bit use common NUMA init path Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 22/25] x86, NUMA: Make numa_init_array() static Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 23/25] x86, NUMA: Rename amdtopology_64.c to amdtopology.c Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 24/25] x86, NUMA: Enable CONFIG_AMD_NUMA on 32bit too Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 25/25] x86, NUMA: Enable emulation " Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 18:15 ` [PATCHSET tip] x86, NUMA: Unify 32 and 64bit NUMA initialization Ingo Molnar
2011-04-29 20:14 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-04-30 12:17   ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-30 12:33     ` [PATCH] x86, NUMA: Fix empty memblk detection in numa_cleanup_meminfo() Tejun Heo
2011-04-30 12:35       ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-01  0:43       ` Yinghai Lu
2011-05-01 10:20         ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-01 19:44           ` [PATCH] x86, numa: Trim numa meminfo with max_pfn in separated loop Yinghai Lu
2011-04-30 16:31     ` [PATCHSET tip] x86, NUMA: Unify 32 and 64bit NUMA initialization Yinghai Lu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1304090924-8197-4-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox