From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: mingo@redhat.com, yinghai@kernel.org, rientjes@google.com,
tglx@linutronix.de, hpa@zytor.com, x86@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 05/25] x86, NUMA: Unify 32/64bit numa_cpu_node() implementation
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 17:28:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1304090924-8197-6-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1304090924-8197-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
Currently, the only meaningful user of apic->x86_32_numa_cpu_node() is
NUMAQ which returns valid mapping only after CPU is initialized during
SMP bringup; thus, the previous patch to set apicid -> node in
setup_local_APIC() makes __apicid_to_node[] always contain the correct
mapping whether custom apic->x86_32_numa_cpu_node() is used or not.
So, there is no reason to keep separate 32bit implementation. We can
always consult __apicid_to_node[]. Move 64bit implementation from
numa_64.c to numa.c and remove 32bit implementation from numa_32.c.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/numa.h | 10 ++++++++++
arch/x86/include/asm/numa_32.h | 6 ------
arch/x86/include/asm/numa_64.h | 3 ---
arch/x86/mm/numa.c | 9 +++++++++
arch/x86/mm/numa_32.c | 5 -----
arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c | 9 ---------
6 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/numa.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/numa.h
index 3d4dab4..b2bd5e6 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/numa.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/numa.h
@@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
#ifndef _ASM_X86_NUMA_H
#define _ASM_X86_NUMA_H
+#include <linux/nodemask.h>
+
#include <asm/topology.h>
#include <asm/apicdef.h>
@@ -22,10 +24,18 @@ static inline void set_apicid_to_node(int apicid, s16 node)
{
__apicid_to_node[apicid] = node;
}
+
+extern int __cpuinit numa_cpu_node(int cpu);
+
#else /* CONFIG_NUMA */
static inline void set_apicid_to_node(int apicid, s16 node)
{
}
+
+static inline int numa_cpu_node(int cpu)
+{
+ return NUMA_NO_NODE;
+}
#endif /* CONFIG_NUMA */
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/numa_32.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/numa_32.h
index c6beed1..242522f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/numa_32.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/numa_32.h
@@ -5,12 +5,6 @@ extern int numa_off;
extern int pxm_to_nid(int pxm);
-#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
-extern int __cpuinit numa_cpu_node(int cpu);
-#else /* CONFIG_NUMA */
-static inline int numa_cpu_node(int cpu) { return NUMA_NO_NODE; }
-#endif /* CONFIG_NUMA */
-
#ifdef CONFIG_HIGHMEM
extern void set_highmem_pages_init(void);
#else
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/numa_64.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/numa_64.h
index 344eb17..12461eb 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/numa_64.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/numa_64.h
@@ -26,7 +26,6 @@ extern void setup_node_bootmem(int nodeid, unsigned long start,
extern nodemask_t numa_nodes_parsed __initdata;
-extern int __cpuinit numa_cpu_node(int cpu);
extern int __init numa_add_memblk(int nodeid, u64 start, u64 end);
extern void __init numa_set_distance(int from, int to, int distance);
@@ -35,8 +34,6 @@ extern void __init numa_set_distance(int from, int to, int distance);
#define FAKE_NODE_MIN_HASH_MASK (~(FAKE_NODE_MIN_SIZE - 1UL))
void numa_emu_cmdline(char *);
#endif /* CONFIG_NUMA_EMU */
-#else
-static inline int numa_cpu_node(int cpu) { return NUMA_NO_NODE; }
#endif
#endif /* _ASM_X86_NUMA_64_H */
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
index 9559d36..08530e3 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
@@ -32,6 +32,15 @@ s16 __apicid_to_node[MAX_LOCAL_APIC] __cpuinitdata = {
[0 ... MAX_LOCAL_APIC-1] = NUMA_NO_NODE
};
+int __cpuinit numa_cpu_node(int cpu)
+{
+ int apicid = early_per_cpu(x86_cpu_to_apicid, cpu);
+
+ if (apicid != BAD_APICID)
+ return __apicid_to_node[apicid];
+ return NUMA_NO_NODE;
+}
+
cpumask_var_t node_to_cpumask_map[MAX_NUMNODES];
EXPORT_SYMBOL(node_to_cpumask_map);
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa_32.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa_32.c
index c757c0a..e0d9716 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/numa_32.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa_32.c
@@ -107,11 +107,6 @@ extern unsigned long highend_pfn, highstart_pfn;
static void *node_remap_start_vaddr[MAX_NUMNODES];
void set_pmd_pfn(unsigned long vaddr, unsigned long pfn, pgprot_t flags);
-int __cpuinit numa_cpu_node(int cpu)
-{
- return apic->x86_32_numa_cpu_node(cpu);
-}
-
/*
* FLAT - support for basic PC memory model with discontig enabled, essentially
* a single node with all available processors in it with a flat
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c
index 59d8a1c..3598fbf 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c
@@ -512,15 +512,6 @@ unsigned long __init numa_free_all_bootmem(void)
return pages;
}
-int __cpuinit numa_cpu_node(int cpu)
-{
- int apicid = early_per_cpu(x86_cpu_to_apicid, cpu);
-
- if (apicid != BAD_APICID)
- return __apicid_to_node[apicid];
- return NUMA_NO_NODE;
-}
-
#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG
int memory_add_physaddr_to_nid(u64 start)
{
--
1.7.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-29 15:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-29 15:28 [PATCHSET tip] x86, NUMA: Unify 32 and 64bit NUMA initialization Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 01/25] x86-64, NUMA: Simplify hotadd memory handling Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 02/25] x86-64, NUMA: trivial cleanups for setup_node_bootmem() Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 03/25] x86-64, NUMA: simplify nodedata allocation Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 17:23 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-04-30 12:02 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 04/25] x86-32, NUMA: Automatically set apicid -> node in setup_local_APIC() Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 06/25] x86-32, NUMA: Make apic->x86_32_numa_cpu_node() optional Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 07/25] x86-32, NUMA: use sparse_memory_present_with_active_regions() Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 08/25] x86, NUMA: trivial cleanups Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 17:25 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-04-30 12:03 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-30 16:24 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-04-30 18:00 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-30 23:10 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-04-30 23:11 ` [PATCH] x86, numa: Rename setup_node_bootmem to setup_node_data Yinghai Lu
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 09/25] x86, NUMA: rename srat_64.c to srat.c Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 10/25] x86, NUMA: make srat.c 32bit safe Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 11/25] x86-32, NUMA: Move get_memcfg_numa() into numa_32.c Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 12/25] x86, NUMA: Move numa_nodes_parsed to numa.[hc] Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 13/25] x86-32, NUMA: implement temporary NUMA init shims Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 14/25] x86-32, NUMA: Replace srat_32.c with srat.c Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 15/25] x86-32, NUMA: Update numaq to use new NUMA init protocol Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 16/25] x86, NUMA: Move NUMA init logic from numa_64.c to numa.c Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 17/25] x86, NUMA: Enable build of generic NUMA init code on 32bit Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 18/25] x86, NUMA: Remove long 64bit assumption from numa.c Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 19/25] x86-32, NUMA: Add @start and @end to init_alloc_remap() Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 20/25] x86, NUMA: Initialize and use remap allocator from setup_node_bootmem() Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 21/25] x86, NUMA: Make 32bit use common NUMA init path Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 22/25] x86, NUMA: Make numa_init_array() static Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 23/25] x86, NUMA: Rename amdtopology_64.c to amdtopology.c Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 24/25] x86, NUMA: Enable CONFIG_AMD_NUMA on 32bit too Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 25/25] x86, NUMA: Enable emulation " Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 18:15 ` [PATCHSET tip] x86, NUMA: Unify 32 and 64bit NUMA initialization Ingo Molnar
2011-04-29 20:14 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-04-30 12:17 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-30 12:33 ` [PATCH] x86, NUMA: Fix empty memblk detection in numa_cleanup_meminfo() Tejun Heo
2011-04-30 12:35 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-01 0:43 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-05-01 10:20 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-01 19:44 ` [PATCH] x86, numa: Trim numa meminfo with max_pfn in separated loop Yinghai Lu
2011-04-30 16:31 ` [PATCHSET tip] x86, NUMA: Unify 32 and 64bit NUMA initialization Yinghai Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1304090924-8197-6-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox